Obama's Legacy: richest got richer and poorest got poorer faster than under Bush/Republicans

[rightwinger]

I wasn't saying anything good about repubs.. They were elected to decrease debt, they never do that..

They did it during the Clinton administration. They've lowered the deficit greatly under DumBama. Without DumBama, we would probably have a balanced budget and then some to pay off the debt.

That's satire, right?

No, it's reality. Just like reality is you want to give DumBama credit for any occurrence that happens to be positive but blame Republicans and Bush when things (most of them) don't go his way.

The United States Congress are the people that write laws, create a budget and spend our money. With the exception of the Bush years, the Republicans in Congress have limited and lowered spending both during the Clinton and DumBama administrations.

That's not true.

Sure it is. Look at our lower deficits after Republicans took over leadership of Congress during the DumBama years. Under Clinton, we not only had a balanced budget, but a projected surplus to boot.

Deficits were dropping well before Republicans took Congress

They just passed their first budget a week ago

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

do you care about the millions who lost their healthcare plan because of Ocare?

They forgot to tell you that they all got it back.

OP- Brainwashed RW idiocy.

they got all what back? their HC? really?

Yup. And many more. Except a few in dumb red states.

proof? btw the costs went up in almost every case.
Not to mention people were happy with their HC and Barry lied about keeping their HCP and Dr.

No one was happy with annual premium hikes of between 15-18%. Since Obamacare went into full swing, we've seen that slow to under 4% the last few years.

The rich have gotten richer and everyone else has stagnated not because Obama, but because the stupid Republican-controlled congress has a vested interest in making sure to pass nothing that might help working people, less Obama get the credit for it. This fact has been out in the open since inauguration night in January of 2009 when Mitch McConnell--de facto leader of the Republican party ever since--said he'd make Obama a one-term President.

From that moment on, before Obama even had a chance to start, Republicans decided they'd oppose everything in a cynical ploy to make voters so frustrated with Washington inaction that it would surely bring Obama down, or at least confuse enough voters into believing Obama to be ineffectual.

Despite having to govern a huge country with one whole party not participating in the process, Obama has managed quite well. Just 6 years after the economic crash, household income has actually begun to rise. Because of Republican intransigence, Obama now gets FULL credit for 68 consecutive months of private sector job growth, a new American record.

Imagine how much better the country would be doing had Republicans actually decided to go to work for the American people these last 6 years instead of only serving themselves.

For your information, the median family income is lower today than before DumBama took office. Yes, the Republicans stopped Obama. That's why American put Republicans into leadership--to stop him, not work with him.

So Mitch said that he wanted to see DumBama as a one term President. What's wrong with that? You mean to tell me that Democrats hope a Republican President is a two-term President? Of course not. Both parties want to see their own in the White House. You on the left act like it's an anomaly or something.

68 months of private job growth? Then why do we still have record amounts of the poor, record people not working since the mid 70's, record number of government dependents?

Not too good of a record if you ask me.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

They did it during the Clinton administration. They've lowered the deficit greatly under DumBama. Without DumBama, we would probably have a balanced budget and then some to pay off the debt.

That's satire, right?

No, it's reality. Just like reality is you want to give DumBama credit for any occurrence that happens to be positive but blame Republicans and Bush when things (most of them) don't go his way.

The United States Congress are the people that write laws, create a budget and spend our money. With the exception of the Bush years, the Republicans in Congress have limited and lowered spending both during the Clinton and DumBama administrations.

That's not true.

Sure it is. Look at our lower deficits after Republicans took over leadership of Congress during the DumBama years. Under Clinton, we not only had a balanced budget, but a projected surplus to boot.

Deficits were dropping well before Republicans took Congress

They just passed their first budget a week ago

Think again:

 

[rightwinger]

They forgot to tell you that they all got it back.

OP- Brainwashed RW idiocy.

they got all what back? their HC? really?

Yup. And many more. Except a few in dumb red states.

proof? btw the costs went up in almost every case.
Not to mention people were happy with their HC and Barry lied about keeping their HCP and Dr.

No one was happy with annual premium hikes of between 15-18%. Since Obamacare went into full swing, we've seen that slow to under 4% the last few years.

The rich have gotten richer and everyone else has stagnated not because Obama, but because the stupid Republican-controlled congress has a vested interest in making sure to pass nothing that might help working people, less Obama get the credit for it. This fact has been out in the open since inauguration night in January of 2009 when Mitch McConnell--de facto leader of the Republican party ever since--said he'd make Obama a one-term President.

From that moment on, before Obama even had a chance to start, Republicans decided they'd oppose everything in a cynical ploy to make voters so frustrated with Washington inaction that it would surely bring Obama down, or at least confuse enough voters into believing Obama to be ineffectual.

Despite having to govern a huge country with one whole party not participating in the process, Obama has managed quite well. Just 6 years after the economic crash, household income has actually begun to rise. Because of Republican intransigence, Obama now gets FULL credit for 68 consecutive months of private sector job growth, a new American record.

Imagine how much better the country would be doing had Republicans actually decided to go to work for the American people these last 6 years instead of only serving themselves.

For your information, the median family income is lower today than before DumBama took office. Yes, the Republicans stopped Obama. That's why American put Republicans into leadership--to stop him, not work with him.

So Mitch said that he wanted to see DumBama as a one term President. What's wrong with that? You mean to tell me that Democrats hope a Republican President is a two-term President? Of course not. Both parties want to see their own in the White House. You on the left act like it's an anomaly or something.

68 months of private job growth? Then why do we still have record amounts of the poor, record people not working since the mid 70's, record number of government dependents?

Not too good of a record if you ask me.

Median wages are down?

I blame the job creators

 

[rightwinger]

That's satire, right?

No, it's reality. Just like reality is you want to give DumBama credit for any occurrence that happens to be positive but blame Republicans and Bush when things (most of them) don't go his way.

The United States Congress are the people that write laws, create a budget and spend our money. With the exception of the Bush years, the Republicans in Congress have limited and lowered spending both during the Clinton and DumBama administrations.

That's not true.

Sure it is. Look at our lower deficits after Republicans took over leadership of Congress during the DumBama years. Under Clinton, we not only had a balanced budget, but a projected surplus to boot.

Deficits were dropping well before Republicans took Congress

They just passed their first budget a week ago

Think again:

View attachment 54305

Looks like the work of the Democratic Senate

 

[Conservative65]

Since when does the rabid Right Wing give a damn about wage disparity? I thought they believe, I mean really BELIEVE in market forces sorting things out and those who got phenomenally wealthy EARNED every penny of it through grueling, hard work.

Which makes one wonder about those of us working two or three jobs. We are working hard, yet...

When did the rabid left wing give a shit? The last 2 presidents you guys have elected have been corporatists. And ANOTHER corporatist is the #1 in the primaries.
LOOK IN THE MIRROR
Both parties suck. Try REALITY

There's a helluva difference. Pubs are so corporatist they're corrupt and thieves. Corps aren't evil, just the Pub ones- screwing the workers, customers, and the environment. Plus: OP- Has nothing to do with 30 years of Reaganist pander to the rich and ruin of the non-rich- see sig (2007!), or GOP obstruction of Obama's tax cuts for the nonrich, min wage hike, infrastructure GOOD jobs bill, immigration bill, training for 3 million tech jobs going begging, tax hikes for over $250k and freeloading giant corps...etc etc etc.

Only to a fucking dumbass Liberal is the same thing different.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

They did it during the Clinton administration. They've lowered the deficit greatly under DumBama. Without DumBama, we would probably have a balanced budget and then some to pay off the debt.

That's satire, right?

No, it's reality. Just like reality is you want to give DumBama credit for any occurrence that happens to be positive but blame Republicans and Bush when things (most of them) don't go his way.

The United States Congress are the people that write laws, create a budget and spend our money. With the exception of the Bush years, the Republicans in Congress have limited and lowered spending both during the Clinton and DumBama administrations.

You mean they obstructed all reform they could.

Yes, they did, and guess what, those reforms costs a lot of money so again, thank Republicans for lowering our deficit these past years plus putting a halt on Obama's idiotic plans that he calls reform.

Like infrastructure jobs, training, helping with college loans...horrible things even Pubs do in this case. Mindless.

Yep, exactly like those things.

Do you on the left understand what the word "broke" means? Broke means no money. Broke likely means in debt. Broke means failure.

Leave it to Democrats to vote for failure.

 

[Conservative65]

they got all what back? their HC? really?

Yup. And many more. Except a few in dumb red states.

proof? btw the costs went up in almost every case.
Not to mention people were happy with their HC and Barry lied about keeping their HCP and Dr.

No one was happy with annual premium hikes of between 15-18%. Since Obamacare went into full swing, we've seen that slow to under 4% the last few years.

The rich have gotten richer and everyone else has stagnated not because Obama, but because the stupid Republican-controlled congress has a vested interest in making sure to pass nothing that might help working people, less Obama get the credit for it. This fact has been out in the open since inauguration night in January of 2009 when Mitch McConnell--de facto leader of the Republican party ever since--said he'd make Obama a one-term President.

From that moment on, before Obama even had a chance to start, Republicans decided they'd oppose everything in a cynical ploy to make voters so frustrated with Washington inaction that it would surely bring Obama down, or at least confuse enough voters into believing Obama to be ineffectual.

Despite having to govern a huge country with one whole party not participating in the process, Obama has managed quite well. Just 6 years after the economic crash, household income has actually begun to rise. Because of Republican intransigence, Obama now gets FULL credit for 68 consecutive months of private sector job growth, a new American record.

Imagine how much better the country would be doing had Republicans actually decided to go to work for the American people these last 6 years instead of only serving themselves.

For your information, the median family income is lower today than before DumBama took office. Yes, the Republicans stopped Obama. That's why American put Republicans into leadership--to stop him, not work with him.

So Mitch said that he wanted to see DumBama as a one term President. What's wrong with that? You mean to tell me that Democrats hope a Republican President is a two-term President? Of course not. Both parties want to see their own in the White House. You on the left act like it's an anomaly or something.

68 months of private job growth? Then why do we still have record amounts of the poor, record people not working since the mid 70's, record number of government dependents?

Not too good of a record if you ask me.

Median wages are down?

I blame the job creators

Not mine. My wages are 2 1/2 times more now than 10 years ago.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

they got all what back? their HC? really?

Yup. And many more. Except a few in dumb red states.

proof? btw the costs went up in almost every case.
Not to mention people were happy with their HC and Barry lied about keeping their HCP and Dr.

No one was happy with annual premium hikes of between 15-18%. Since Obamacare went into full swing, we've seen that slow to under 4% the last few years.

The rich have gotten richer and everyone else has stagnated not because Obama, but because the stupid Republican-controlled congress has a vested interest in making sure to pass nothing that might help working people, less Obama get the credit for it. This fact has been out in the open since inauguration night in January of 2009 when Mitch McConnell--de facto leader of the Republican party ever since--said he'd make Obama a one-term President.

From that moment on, before Obama even had a chance to start, Republicans decided they'd oppose everything in a cynical ploy to make voters so frustrated with Washington inaction that it would surely bring Obama down, or at least confuse enough voters into believing Obama to be ineffectual.

Despite having to govern a huge country with one whole party not participating in the process, Obama has managed quite well. Just 6 years after the economic crash, household income has actually begun to rise. Because of Republican intransigence, Obama now gets FULL credit for 68 consecutive months of private sector job growth, a new American record.

Imagine how much better the country would be doing had Republicans actually decided to go to work for the American people these last 6 years instead of only serving themselves.

For your information, the median family income is lower today than before DumBama took office. Yes, the Republicans stopped Obama. That's why American put Republicans into leadership--to stop him, not work with him.

So Mitch said that he wanted to see DumBama as a one term President. What's wrong with that? You mean to tell me that Democrats hope a Republican President is a two-term President? Of course not. Both parties want to see their own in the White House. You on the left act like it's an anomaly or something.

68 months of private job growth? Then why do we still have record amounts of the poor, record people not working since the mid 70's, record number of government dependents?

Not too good of a record if you ask me.

Median wages are down?

I blame the job creators

Of course you do. You certainly can't blame Obama......... you never do.

 

[The Rabbi]

Idiot.
Since the lag time to produce weapons etc is so long it is much longer than any threat.
If you want peace, prepare for war.

Bozo

Our prospective enemy needs to develop weapons before they can be considered a threat

Nobody is remotely close today. We have a stronger military than the next 14 nations combined .....and 12 of the 14 are our allies

So? You are an ignoramus. How much did it take to wage war in Afghanistan against a bunch of tribesmen? We dont want a fair fight. We want overwhelming force and the ability to project it.

And we have it

But it doesn't take a Military larger than the next 14 countries to defeat Afghan tribesmen

What restricts our military involvement around the world is not the size of our military, but how many casualties we are willing to tolerate

So what was our most success in Iraq? The surge. What is a surge? More military boots on the ground. It worked.

Surge was only necessary to cover our ass

Never should have been there in the first place

Hindsight is 20/20. And your side lost. We were right to go in. Bush's actions in the face of the surrender caucus among the Democrats won the war.
Obama fucked up the peace and now the ME is a blazing shithole.

 

[The Rabbi]

That's satire, right?

No, it's reality. Just like reality is you want to give DumBama credit for any occurrence that happens to be positive but blame Republicans and Bush when things (most of them) don't go his way.

The United States Congress are the people that write laws, create a budget and spend our money. With the exception of the Bush years, the Republicans in Congress have limited and lowered spending both during the Clinton and DumBama administrations.

That's not true.

Sure it is. Look at our lower deficits after Republicans took over leadership of Congress during the DumBama years. Under Clinton, we not only had a balanced budget, but a projected surplus to boot.

Deficits were dropping well before Republicans took Congress

They just passed their first budget a week ago

Think again:

View attachment 54305

You're assuming he thought the first time. He does not. Nutjobber posts the looniest crap and when called on it withdraws into incoherence. He's already gotten his ass beaten once this morning when he could not explain his own chart. Now you've pwned him on fact. He is scarcely worth bothering with.

 

[rightwinger]

Yup. And many more. Except a few in dumb red states.

proof? btw the costs went up in almost every case.
Not to mention people were happy with their HC and Barry lied about keeping their HCP and Dr.

No one was happy with annual premium hikes of between 15-18%. Since Obamacare went into full swing, we've seen that slow to under 4% the last few years.

The rich have gotten richer and everyone else has stagnated not because Obama, but because the stupid Republican-controlled congress has a vested interest in making sure to pass nothing that might help working people, less Obama get the credit for it. This fact has been out in the open since inauguration night in January of 2009 when Mitch McConnell--de facto leader of the Republican party ever since--said he'd make Obama a one-term President.

From that moment on, before Obama even had a chance to start, Republicans decided they'd oppose everything in a cynical ploy to make voters so frustrated with Washington inaction that it would surely bring Obama down, or at least confuse enough voters into believing Obama to be ineffectual.

Despite having to govern a huge country with one whole party not participating in the process, Obama has managed quite well. Just 6 years after the economic crash, household income has actually begun to rise. Because of Republican intransigence, Obama now gets FULL credit for 68 consecutive months of private sector job growth, a new American record.

Imagine how much better the country would be doing had Republicans actually decided to go to work for the American people these last 6 years instead of only serving themselves.

For your information, the median family income is lower today than before DumBama took office. Yes, the Republicans stopped Obama. That's why American put Republicans into leadership--to stop him, not work with him.

So Mitch said that he wanted to see DumBama as a one term President. What's wrong with that? You mean to tell me that Democrats hope a Republican President is a two-term President? Of course not. Both parties want to see their own in the White House. You on the left act like it's an anomaly or something.

68 months of private job growth? Then why do we still have record amounts of the poor, record people not working since the mid 70's, record number of government dependents?

Not too good of a record if you ask me.

Median wages are down?

I blame the job creators

Of course you do. You certainly can't blame Obama......... you never do.

After all we have done for the "job creators"
Record low taxes, low capital gains, bailouts, TARP

What do we have to show for it?
Lower wages

Why are we helping job creators again?

 

[rightwinger]

Bozo

Our prospective enemy needs to develop weapons before they can be considered a threat

Nobody is remotely close today. We have a stronger military than the next 14 nations combined .....and 12 of the 14 are our allies

So? You are an ignoramus. How much did it take to wage war in Afghanistan against a bunch of tribesmen? We dont want a fair fight. We want overwhelming force and the ability to project it.

And we have it

But it doesn't take a Military larger than the next 14 countries to defeat Afghan tribesmen

What restricts our military involvement around the world is not the size of our military, but how many casualties we are willing to tolerate

So what was our most success in Iraq? The surge. What is a surge? More military boots on the ground. It worked.

Surge was only necessary to cover our ass

Never should have been there in the first place

Hindsight is 20/20. And your side lost. We were right to go in. Bush's actions in the face of the surrender caucus among the Democrats won the war.
Obama fucked up the peace and now the ME is a blazing shithole.

5000 dead

 

[The Rabbi]

proof? btw the costs went up in almost every case.
Not to mention people were happy with their HC and Barry lied about keeping their HCP and Dr.

No one was happy with annual premium hikes of between 15-18%. Since Obamacare went into full swing, we've seen that slow to under 4% the last few years.

The rich have gotten richer and everyone else has stagnated not because Obama, but because the stupid Republican-controlled congress has a vested interest in making sure to pass nothing that might help working people, less Obama get the credit for it. This fact has been out in the open since inauguration night in January of 2009 when Mitch McConnell--de facto leader of the Republican party ever since--said he'd make Obama a one-term President.

From that moment on, before Obama even had a chance to start, Republicans decided they'd oppose everything in a cynical ploy to make voters so frustrated with Washington inaction that it would surely bring Obama down, or at least confuse enough voters into believing Obama to be ineffectual.

Despite having to govern a huge country with one whole party not participating in the process, Obama has managed quite well. Just 6 years after the economic crash, household income has actually begun to rise. Because of Republican intransigence, Obama now gets FULL credit for 68 consecutive months of private sector job growth, a new American record.

Imagine how much better the country would be doing had Republicans actually decided to go to work for the American people these last 6 years instead of only serving themselves.

For your information, the median family income is lower today than before DumBama took office. Yes, the Republicans stopped Obama. That's why American put Republicans into leadership--to stop him, not work with him.

So Mitch said that he wanted to see DumBama as a one term President. What's wrong with that? You mean to tell me that Democrats hope a Republican President is a two-term President? Of course not. Both parties want to see their own in the White House. You on the left act like it's an anomaly or something.

68 months of private job growth? Then why do we still have record amounts of the poor, record people not working since the mid 70's, record number of government dependents?

Not too good of a record if you ask me.

Median wages are down?

I blame the job creators

Of course you do. You certainly can't blame Obama......... you never do.

After all we have done for the "job creators"
Record low taxes, low capital gains, bailouts, TARP

What do we have to show for it?
Lower wages

Why are we helping job creators again?

"You" havent done diddly squat for anyone except the Paki at the corner selling sixers.
Obama has raised tax rates, raised capital gains taxes, and imposed job killing rules on all Americans.
There's your low growth right there.

 

[The Rabbi]

So? You are an ignoramus. How much did it take to wage war in Afghanistan against a bunch of tribesmen? We dont want a fair fight. We want overwhelming force and the ability to project it.

And we have it

But it doesn't take a Military larger than the next 14 countries to defeat Afghan tribesmen

What restricts our military involvement around the world is not the size of our military, but how many casualties we are willing to tolerate

So what was our most success in Iraq? The surge. What is a surge? More military boots on the ground. It worked.

Surge was only necessary to cover our ass

Never should have been there in the first place

Hindsight is 20/20. And your side lost. We were right to go in. Bush's actions in the face of the surrender caucus among the Democrats won the war.
Obama fucked up the peace and now the ME is a blazing shithole.

5000 dead

Cheap at twice the price.
How many were killed in 9/11?

 

[rightwinger]

No one was happy with annual premium hikes of between 15-18%. Since Obamacare went into full swing, we've seen that slow to under 4% the last few years.

The rich have gotten richer and everyone else has stagnated not because Obama, but because the stupid Republican-controlled congress has a vested interest in making sure to pass nothing that might help working people, less Obama get the credit for it. This fact has been out in the open since inauguration night in January of 2009 when Mitch McConnell--de facto leader of the Republican party ever since--said he'd make Obama a one-term President.

From that moment on, before Obama even had a chance to start, Republicans decided they'd oppose everything in a cynical ploy to make voters so frustrated with Washington inaction that it would surely bring Obama down, or at least confuse enough voters into believing Obama to be ineffectual.

Despite having to govern a huge country with one whole party not participating in the process, Obama has managed quite well. Just 6 years after the economic crash, household income has actually begun to rise. Because of Republican intransigence, Obama now gets FULL credit for 68 consecutive months of private sector job growth, a new American record.

Imagine how much better the country would be doing had Republicans actually decided to go to work for the American people these last 6 years instead of only serving themselves.

For your information, the median family income is lower today than before DumBama took office. Yes, the Republicans stopped Obama. That's why American put Republicans into leadership--to stop him, not work with him.

So Mitch said that he wanted to see DumBama as a one term President. What's wrong with that? You mean to tell me that Democrats hope a Republican President is a two-term President? Of course not. Both parties want to see their own in the White House. You on the left act like it's an anomaly or something.

68 months of private job growth? Then why do we still have record amounts of the poor, record people not working since the mid 70's, record number of government dependents?

Not too good of a record if you ask me.

Median wages are down?

I blame the job creators

Of course you do. You certainly can't blame Obama......... you never do.

After all we have done for the "job creators"
Record low taxes, low capital gains, bailouts, TARP

What do we have to show for it?
Lower wages

Why are we helping job creators again?

"You" havent done diddly squat for anyone except the Paki at the corner selling sixers.
Obama has raised tax rates, raised capital gains taxes, and imposed job killing rules on all Americans.
There's your low growth right there.

What's a paki?

 

[The Rabbi]

For your information, the median family income is lower today than before DumBama took office. Yes, the Republicans stopped Obama. That's why American put Republicans into leadership--to stop him, not work with him.

So Mitch said that he wanted to see DumBama as a one term President. What's wrong with that? You mean to tell me that Democrats hope a Republican President is a two-term President? Of course not. Both parties want to see their own in the White House. You on the left act like it's an anomaly or something.

68 months of private job growth? Then why do we still have record amounts of the poor, record people not working since the mid 70's, record number of government dependents?

Not too good of a record if you ask me.

Median wages are down?

I blame the job creators

Of course you do. You certainly can't blame Obama......... you never do.

After all we have done for the "job creators"
Record low taxes, low capital gains, bailouts, TARP

What do we have to show for it?
Lower wages

Why are we helping job creators again?

"You" havent done diddly squat for anyone except the Paki at the corner selling sixers.
Obama has raised tax rates, raised capital gains taxes, and imposed job killing rules on all Americans.
There's your low growth right there.

What's a paki?

Something you dont understand.

 

[rightwinger]

And we have it

But it doesn't take a Military larger than the next 14 countries to defeat Afghan tribesmen

What restricts our military involvement around the world is not the size of our military, but how many casualties we are willing to tolerate

So what was our most success in Iraq? The surge. What is a surge? More military boots on the ground. It worked.

Surge was only necessary to cover our ass

Never should have been there in the first place

Hindsight is 20/20. And your side lost. We were right to go in. Bush's actions in the face of the surrender caucus among the Democrats won the war.
Obama fucked up the peace and now the ME is a blazing shithole.

5000 dead

Cheap at twice the price.
How many were killed in 9/11?

You send an additional 5000 Americans to their death to avenge 3000 killed on 9/11 and you attack a country that wasn't even involved?

You call that cheap? You are one sick SOB

 

[The Rabbi]

So what was our most success in Iraq? The surge. What is a surge? More military boots on the ground. It worked.

Surge was only necessary to cover our ass

Never should have been there in the first place

Hindsight is 20/20. And your side lost. We were right to go in. Bush's actions in the face of the surrender caucus among the Democrats won the war.
Obama fucked up the peace and now the ME is a blazing shithole.

5000 dead

Cheap at twice the price.
How many were killed in 9/11?

You send an additional 5000 Americans to their death to avenge 3000 killed on 9/11 and you attack a country that wasn't even involved?

You call that cheap? You are one sick SOB

You are truly clueless. No need to prove it.
Remind me how Obama's surge in Afghanistan has accomplished anything other than needless loss of American life.

 

[rightwinger]

Surge was only necessary to cover our ass

Never should have been there in the first place

Hindsight is 20/20. And your side lost. We were right to go in. Bush's actions in the face of the surrender caucus among the Democrats won the war.
Obama fucked up the peace and now the ME is a blazing shithole.

5000 dead

Cheap at twice the price.
How many were killed in 9/11?

You send an additional 5000 Americans to their death to avenge 3000 killed on 9/11 and you attack a country that wasn't even involved?

You call that cheap? You are one sick SOB

You are truly clueless. No need to prove it.
Remind me how Obama's surge in Afghanistan has accomplished anything other than needless loss of American life.

No, seriously

You are one sick SOB laughing off 5000 dead in a senseless war

But it was only 5000 killed