CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,580
- 69,689
- 2,330
They left headed toward broadway
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You should have told him he should be more concerned with Irish Spring.Lol
Jackass carrying a "let freedom spring" sign
Me: what does that mean
Jackass: its a reference to the arab spring
and he walks off
Lol
I don't see how 15 or 20 people living in cardboard boxes can cause too much disruption.
I tend to agree and I doubt the NYC police Department will put up with the shit they put up with last time round.
The Occupy crowd should all get fucking jobs and stop being idiots.
Wow.
Just reading their literature.
"Never in history did the rich & powerful give up their privileges voluntarily"
Just fucking Wow
From "The Occupied Wall Street Journal"
No it isn't noob. I work on the corner of 42nd and 3rd. You people do not know at ALL what you are talking about.
It's too bad Soros wishes are so taken to heart by the Democrats. They've put up a "We're for sale sign to the highest bidder" by encouraging months and months of being and encouraging ninnyhammers to break windows, trash throughfares, damage small businesses, and getting paid by huge backers to show falsetto "outrage" against conservative Americans and our form of government, business endeavors and enterprising pursuits that put money in the treasury by taxes paid.Well, the cold weather has passed (the majority of them were more concerned with comfort than their cause, of course) so the Occupy WSers are getting riled up again...they are threatening to shut down bridges and roadways, as well as causing general disruptions to the populace across the nation. Knowing this, do they have a Constitutional right to do this or will the protestors become criminals if they carry these threats out? Personally, I think they fall outside "the right of the people peaceably to assemble", when they break the law by interfering with the rights of others by shutting down the ability to travel and I would have law enforcement ready to arrest and jail each and every person attempting to do so.
The Democrats are counting on the handouts crowd to create civil unrest while they squeeze the last drop of money out of the US Treasury to ensure that Nancy Pelosi's family will have unlimited backing for failing projects and new projects that failed in the past because they don't work. It's just cherry picking money off money hardworking taxpayers put there.
Of course unemployed people, druggies, and college students looking for an easy buck will go for the gold Soros doles out through "foundations" to pillory and beat back taxpayers just trying to get a piece of the American dream by working for it. Of course, with the Democrats making higher and higher and higher demands on people's money, they won't have a snowball's chance in hell if the Democrat-sponsored OWS fools people into thinking this is a grass-roots movement.
It's not. It's only a way to get money since the Democrats have killed new jobs prospects in the energy industry and anything else they can't control and micromanage into oblivion.
Well, the cold weather has passed (the majority of them were more concerned with comfort than their cause, of course) so the Occupy WSers are getting riled up again...they are threatening to shut down bridges and roadways, as well as causing general disruptions to the populace across the nation. Knowing this, do they have a Constitutional right to do this or will the protestors become criminals if they carry these threats out? Personally, I think they fall outside "the right of the people peaceably to assemble", when they break the law by interfering with the rights of others by shutting down the ability to travel and I would have law enforcement ready to arrest and jail each and every person attempting to do so.
Arrest them all. They don't have the right to impede the travel of others. The can, however, stand on a corner and peacefully state their cause.
Wow.
Just reading their literature.
"Never in history did the rich & powerful give up their privileges voluntarily"
Just fucking Wow
From "The Occupied Wall Street Journal"
I am glad you thought better of it. <gulp>I should have started yelling:"Stop Obama's War for Oil!!
I don't know any 'occupiers' except for one young relative who lives on the East Coast and who does plan to be in NYC. What I read on his Facebook Page and the responses of his friends there is frightening. These kids/young adults have no clue what they are protesting, why they are protesting, or what they hope to accomplish. But they are whipped into a frenzy to disrupt, destroy, and take it all down. Their language is vile and violent.
The mainstream media seem to mostly have their heads stuck in the sand. Since our Fearless Leader has praised and accepted the occupier groups as 'grass roots' and "America", they have a dilemma. They are his hand maidens and advocates. Do they report what is happening and make him look like more of an idiot and/or anti-Ameican than he already does by endorsing them? Or do they hope by not calling attention to it, nobody will notice?
God, are these useless wankers kicking up a fuss again on your side of the pond as well? When our 'occupiers' occupied the space outside St. Paul's cathedral in central London the press trained heat-seeking cameras at the tents pitched in the thoroughfare over night. Almost every single one of them failed to register a heat source i.e - they were left unoccupied, which was ruthlessly ironic. When this little irony was pointed out to them, most of them tried to sheepishly excuse their complete lack of backbone by citing the weather in defence: 'Well, it was really, really cold last night. So I popped home for a bath and a hot meal.' Duh, you fu***** dickheads, discomfort is what lends your protest integrity in the first place.
God, are these useless wankers kicking up a fuss again on your side of the pond as well? When our 'occupiers' occupied the space outside St. Paul's cathedral in central London the press trained heat-seeking cameras at the tents pitched in the thoroughfare over night. Almost every single one of them failed to register a heat source i.e - they were left unoccupied, which was ruthlessly ironic. When this little irony was pointed out to them, most of them tried to sheepishly excuse their complete lack of backbone by citing the weather in defence: 'Well, it was really, really cold last night. So I popped home for a bath and a hot meal.' Duh, you fu***** dickheads, discomfort is what lends your protest integrity in the first place.
Yes, yes you should have.I should have started yelling:"Stop Obama's War for Oil!!