Offical Impeachment Thread

[IM2]

He was far from factless.

name one then

No. You heard the testimony so if you want to lie to yourself, that's not my problem.

Concession noted.

poke them long enough and they eventually admit they got nothing.

My refusal to do what you right wing maggots never do is no concession.

is my evidence.[/QUOTE]
You have no evidence.

 

[The Purge]

CNN analyst: It's a 'problem' for Dems that impeachment witnesses never met Trump

A prominent CNN commentator pointed out a "problem" House Democrats have following the first public hearing in their impeachment inquiry of President Trump.

U.S. diplomat Bill Taylor and State Department official George Kent were the first witnesses to offer their testimony in the open and were grilled for several hours over their knowledge of Trump's conduct with Ukraine. GOP lawmakers specifically questioned the witnesses about their previous testimony, which relied heavily on second- and third-hand knowledge.

Following the hearing, CNN Chief Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin suggested that the vocal observation from Trump's defenders was "legitimate."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

 

[bripat9643]

name the high crime?

Abuse of power.

No such crime.

Lying fucking moron...

• The Articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon

Article II
ARTICLE II, ABUSE OF POWER. (Approved 28-10)

Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States, and to the best of his ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice in the conduct of lawful inquiries, of contravening the law of governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposes of these agencies.​

• H. Rept. 105-830 - IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

D. Article IV--Abuse of Power

Article IV - 1
1. The President abused his power by refusing and failing to respond to certain written requests for admission and willfully made perjurious, false, and misleading sworn statements in response to certain written requests for admission propounded to him by the Committee​

Quote the statute titled "Abuse of power." The fact that a bunch of Dims made up a crime means nothing.

There doesn't have to be a statute, ya lying fucking moron.

Have you learned nothing at all??

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic, if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role.” ~ Lindsey Graham​

Wrong. For something to be a crime, there has to be a statute. Otherwise it's just a whine.

 

[toobfreak]

Not sure why there's an 'official' impeachment thread given the fact that no one has been impeached, including Trump.

Yes that really makes me wonder why these hearings are not called the Ukraine Hearings? Isn't "Impeachment" a little presumptuous considering that you are only gathering the evidence to see IF Trump did anything wrong? Otherwise this would be a trail. But Oh wait. Dang. I remember now. The Dimowits were talking impeachment the day Trump took office before he had done anything but breathed. Now they are merely trying to build the case to support it.

They have had the lynch mob waiting out back for years now complete with noose hanging from tree branch.

 

[IM2]

And I will tell you again, the treaty was not about Biden, try as hard as you wish to make it about him. The treaty is about Trump, who again, was not authorized to use it.

That's now twice you've asked that and twice I gave you an answer you don't like. If you keep asking you will keep getting the same answer; and you know what repeating yourself but expecting a different response symptomatic of, right?

Since you can't back up that claim, dumbfuck...... link us up to the part of the treaty that says the President can't use it.

Dumbfuck...

​

Nowhere in there does it say the President can't use it. In fact, it never even mentions the President, dumbfuck.

Try again, dumbfuck.

You lose again, dumbfuck.

LOL

Dumbfuck, what part of, "each Contracting State shall have a Central Authority to make and receive requests pursuant to this treaty," is above your single digit IQ?

Where does it say the president can't simply make a personal request?

In the constitution and federal election laws. Because this was not a personal request. He was not holding back personal money from the Ukraine.

 

[007]

And Trump has been obstructing to save his ass since 2017.

Obstructing what? The corrupt democrat coup?

 

[Cellblock2429]

And you know this because you were on the call and took notes...

We know this because of the annotation used. As anyone who reads news outside of the bubble knows. Also, it is explicitly stated in the release itself. And then this was corroborated by impeachment inquiry witnesses.

Again:

As every fiwnctioning adult who reads news from outside the bubble knows.

/——/ And none of your hard evidence is even being mentioned on the LSM. Shame

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

They aren't witnesses to the call, moron.

We know this. Now what's your point?

Are you asserting that they had no first hand knowledge of how this policy was playing out on the Ukrainian side?

Firsthand is one word. LMAO. You’re so stupid and a pussy. Biden is corrupt and Trump wants to know what happened with the Nepotism gig and firing of the prosecutor

And?
The substance?
Nothing?

Let's try again.

Are you asserting that they had no first hand knowledge of how this policy was playing out on the Ukrainian side?

Trying VERY hard to sound as though he has a point that's relevant to anything, but same as Adam ScHITt, is FAILING, MISERABLY... ^^^

Another that won't engage. Go figure.

I'll give you another chance as well.

Are you asserting that they had no first hand knowledge of how this policy was playing out on the Ukrainian side?

Engage? You're a pussy.

 

[IM2]

Abuse of power.

No such crime.

Lying fucking moron...

• The Articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon

Article II
ARTICLE II, ABUSE OF POWER. (Approved 28-10)

Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States, and to the best of his ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice in the conduct of lawful inquiries, of contravening the law of governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposes of these agencies.​

• H. Rept. 105-830 - IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

D. Article IV--Abuse of Power

Article IV - 1
1. The President abused his power by refusing and failing to respond to certain written requests for admission and willfully made perjurious, false, and misleading sworn statements in response to certain written requests for admission propounded to him by the Committee​

Quote the statute titled "Abuse of power." The fact that a bunch of Dims made up a crime means nothing.

There doesn't have to be a statute, ya lying fucking moron.

Have you learned nothing at all??

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic, if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role.” ~ Lindsey Graham​

Wrong. For something to be a crime, there has to be a statute. Otherwise it's just a whine.

Trump has committed crimes but you don't have to commit a crime to be fired from your job.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Dumbfuck...

​

Nowhere in there does it say the President can't use it. In fact, it never even mentions the President, dumbfuck.

Try again, dumbfuck.

You lose again, dumbfuck.

LOL

Dumbfuck, what part of, "each Contracting State shall have a Central Authority to make and receive requests pursuant to this treaty," is above your single digit IQ?

You claimed it barred the President from using it. You failed to show where it does that, dumbfuck.

You lose again, dumbfuck.

LOLOL

You're fucking deranged, dumbfuck.

You must think Trump is the Attorney General and Zelensky is the Prosecutor General.

Another fail by you, dumbfuck.

Where does the treaty say the President can't use it, dumbfuck?

You lose again, dumbfuck.

He is a loser. He didn't know what QE was.

 

[jc456]

If you think those men were clowns, you're an idiot.

Oh please....when Jordan got done with Taylor, he had the look on his face like he just got busted with somebody else's wife. He looked more confused than a baby at a topless bar.

He was speechless, alright. But not because Jordan was so "astute." Jordan's good at what he does, as the Republican's doberman. I agree. But Jordan is 95% bark and his nips yesterday barely broke skin.

He was speechless because he was trying to stay neutral and non political. I am sure he could have shut down Jordan's yelping about nothing had he wanted to.

Didn't he end up breaking into a huge grin at one point?
Yeah, speechless.

He sure did. And it looked like he was fighting and trying real hard to hold back a good loud laugh.

Right? Laughing at the three ring circus he entered. Exactly!!!

 

[IM2]

And Trump has been obstructing to save his ass since 2017.

Obstructing what? The corrupt democrat coup?

There has been no coup.

 

[jc456]

Another wasted day the swamp democrat leaders carry on this impeachment charade. All taken advantage of by the hard working tax payer expense.

The important thing is, yesterday was the BIG DAY, the STAR WITNESSES, the day that they were SUPPOSED to GET TRUMP, but it fizzled like a melting lollipop.

So today, not only is no one covering this FARCE, no one wants to WATCH IT.

It's OVER. The dems blew their wad and it's OVER.

Now comes the IG report, and the demtrash have a RUDE AWAKENING coming.

No one is scheduled to testify today. This is just the beginning son.

"Hurry up and wait".....been hearing that since Nov 2016.

And Trump has been obstructing to save his ass since 2017.

obstructing what? you never made a claim of the investigation you're after.

 

[IM2]

Oh please....when Jordan got done with Taylor, he had the look on his face like he just got busted with somebody else's wife. He looked more confused than a baby at a topless bar.

He was speechless, alright. But not because Jordan was so "astute." Jordan's good at what he does, as the Republican's doberman. I agree. But Jordan is 95% bark and his nips yesterday barely broke skin.

He was speechless because he was trying to stay neutral and non political. I am sure he could have shut down Jordan's yelping about nothing had he wanted to.

Didn't he end up breaking into a huge grin at one point?
Yeah, speechless.

He sure did. And it looked like he was fighting and trying real hard to hold back a good loud laugh.

Right? Laughing at the three ring circus he entered. Exactly!!!

He was laughing at the dumb ass question the republican lawyer asked

 

[jc456]

And Trump has been obstructing to save his ass since 2017.

Obstructing what? The corrupt democrat coup?

There has been no coup.

sure there has, the lawyer for your leaker said so in a tweet. you missed that too? fk son, you aren't fking bright at all.

 

[MAGAman]

Apparently not.

You have no evidence.

And your feelings don't matter.

 

[jc456]

He was speechless, alright. But not because Jordan was so "astute." Jordan's good at what he does, as the Republican's doberman. I agree. But Jordan is 95% bark and his nips yesterday barely broke skin.

He was speechless because he was trying to stay neutral and non political. I am sure he could have shut down Jordan's yelping about nothing had he wanted to.

Didn't he end up breaking into a huge grin at one point?
Yeah, speechless.

He sure did. And it looked like he was fighting and trying real hard to hold back a good loud laugh.

Right? Laughing at the three ring circus he entered. Exactly!!!

He was laughing at the dumb ass question the republican lawyer asked

actually it was a statement, but hey what the fk do you know. and it was a laugh or smear at the circus. you should probably avoid wasting money on movies, you can't understand the actors expressions.

 

[MAGAman]

No. You heard the testimony so if you want to lie to yourself, that's not my problem.

IOW - You can't quote any direct evidence.

Got it.

 

[jc456]

Apparently not.

You have no evidence.

And your feelings don't matter.

neither do the two schmucks that showed up yesterday at our house.

 

[Nostra]

Another wasted day the swamp democrat leaders carry on this impeachment charade. All taken advantage of by the hard working tax payer expense.

The important thing is, yesterday was the BIG DAY, the STAR WITNESSES, the day that they were SUPPOSED to GET TRUMP, but it fizzled like a melting lollipop.

So today, not only is no one covering this FARCE, no one wants to WATCH IT.

It's OVER. The dems blew their wad and it's OVER.

Now comes the IG report, and the demtrash have a RUDE AWAKENING coming.

No one is scheduled to testify today. This is just the beginning son.

"Hurry up and wait".....been hearing that since Nov 2016.

And Trump has been obstructing to save his ass since 2017.

Lies.