Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Silly question, for two reasons:
1) trump had already witheld the aid. So that was the existing state of affairs. He also did not have to state, in the phone call, that the sun rises in the east.
2) the phone call is only a small part of the body of evidence, which includes, in no small part, the cover up of the phone call
3) Zelensky and his aides either were already aware the aid was withheld, and/or had it confirmed a few days later. After all, they knew that the aid was approved, but didn't arrive at the time of the call. The goofs are telling us Zelensky and his staff would fail to connect the dots: "a favor, though". Hence no extortion. Because it isn't extortion if the target doesn't realize he has his fingernails pulled out to cough up the "deliverable".
Trump loves his marks, the "uneducated". On this thread, you can behold, in great detail, why that is.
There are two and the house has access to both... now GFYWe don't have the transcript. Come on man, keep up.Quote the transcript.
An idiotic response. Nobody said or implied that hearsay was the only evidence against trump.I'd sure like to see a prosecutor convict somebody on robbery or murder based on hearsay
Prove it was not.Really? When did Obama approve it? When did both houses of Congress approve it?What Biden said was fully approved by Obama and both House and Congress. It was not to get them to spew BS so Clinton could win. Just so we know more facts here.So extortion is legal. Who knew?A shakedown with no quid, no pro, and no quo?
How does that work?
It wouldn't matter if there was. As Professor Dershowitz pointed out, there is no law against quid pro quo's in the statute. He looked up, down and sideways. Couldn't find one.
If you call that extortion, then what Biden did was worse, since what he did is what the commies are accusing Trump of doing.
Discussion of mod actions edited
Impeachment is constitutional.Trump is President.
He's in charge.
Get over it.
We don't have the transcript. Come on man, keep up.Quote the transcript.
Shameless, ignorant lie. If you are this ignorant, you shouldn't evn be commenting in this thread.There are two and the house has access to both
Link to this approval of Biden's extortion to get a prosecutor fired for investigating his son's company?What Biden said was fully approved by Obama and both House and Congress. It was not to get them to spew BS so Clinton could win. Just so we know more facts here.So extortion is legal. Who knew?A shakedown with no quid, no pro, and no quo?sondalnd admitted that there was a shake down.
How does that work?
It wouldn't matter if there was. As Professor Dershowitz pointed out, there is no law against quid pro quo's in the statute. He looked up, down and sideways. Couldn't find one.
If you call that extortion, then what Biden did was worse, since what he did is what the commies are accusing Trump of doing.
Discussion of mod actions edited,
YEP, Above you can see. More weak USMB DOPer Mod editing of our factual posts.
That is not a transcript. Sorry. It appears you and billybobcletusjoerickybobby are the last two peole on earth to realize this.We don't have the transcript. Come on man, keep up.Quote the transcript.
Transcript of Trump call with Ukraine’s Zelensky: full text as released by White House
That is not a transcript. Sorry. It appears you and billybobcletusjoerickybobby are the last two peole on earth to realize this.We don't have the transcript. Come on man, keep up.Quote the transcript.
Transcript of Trump call with Ukraine’s Zelensky: full text as released by White House
The call is the entire bases of the impeachment inquiry, dumbass. The opinions of ambassadors are evidence of nothing.Too bad you can't see the extortion. Is it that dark up Trump's ass?/----/ Too bad Shytface can't prove anything. Maybe you should testify.I am neither Republican or Democrat. Both parties are corrupt. Trump is the most corrupt (and stupid) of all.
You might want to get into a legal dictionary and see what elements are required for extortion. They aren't present in the call.
.
Who cares about the call? The call is just a single piece of evidence. One in which the big dummy couldn't close the deal and still got caught.
Too bad you can't see the extortion. Is it that dark up Trump's ass?/----/ Too bad Shytface can't prove anything. Maybe you should testify.I am neither Republican or Democrat. Both parties are corrupt. Trump is the most corrupt (and stupid) of all.
You might want to get into a legal dictionary and see what elements are required for extortion. They aren't present in the call.
.
Who cares about the call? The call is just a single piece of evidence. One in which the big dummy couldn't close the deal and still got caught.
Evidence, opinions aren't evidence. Differences over policy aren't evidence either.
.
/——/ Now if you only had some proof like a transcript—- oh wait. Never mind.The call is the entire bases of the impeachment inquiry, dumbass. The opinions of ambassadors are evidence of nothing.Too bad you can't see the extortion. Is it that dark up Trump's ass?/----/ Too bad Shytface can't prove anything. Maybe you should testify.
You might want to get into a legal dictionary and see what elements are required for extortion. They aren't present in the call.
.
Who cares about the call? The call is just a single piece of evidence. One in which the big dummy couldn't close the deal and still got caught.
Nah. It's Trump ordering Rudy, Gordon, Mick and Rick to break the rules. The phone call is just where bigmouth couldn't contain himself.
Moron.
Personally, I am desperately awaiting the next Schifferbrains debacle hearing to blow up in your faces.Too bad you can't see the extortion. Is it that dark up Trump's ass?/----/ Too bad Shytface can't prove anything. Maybe you should testify.
You might want to get into a legal dictionary and see what elements are required for extortion. They aren't present in the call.
.
Who cares about the call? The call is just a single piece of evidence. One in which the big dummy couldn't close the deal and still got caught.
Evidence, opinions aren't evidence. Differences over policy aren't evidence either.
.
You fuckers are desperate. It's fucking fantastic.
Fact check: What Joe and Hunter Biden actually did in UkraineLink to this approval of Biden's extortion to get a prosecutor fired for investigating his son's company?What Biden said was fully approved by Obama and both House and Congress. It was not to get them to spew BS so Clinton could win. Just so we know more facts here.So extortion is legal. Who knew?A shakedown with no quid, no pro, and no quo?
How does that work?
It wouldn't matter if there was. As Professor Dershowitz pointed out, there is no law against quid pro quo's in the statute. He looked up, down and sideways. Couldn't find one.
If you call that extortion, then what Biden did was worse, since what he did is what the commies are accusing Trump of doing.
Discussion of mod actions edited,
YEP, Above you can see. More weak USMB DOPer Mod editing of our factual posts.
Like I said, you Dems still don't understand what Mulvaney said."We do Extortion and Bribery all the time" ~Mulvaney 2019.
I guess this is the new MAGA slogan?
The innerweb irony meter just exploded.Too bad you can't see the extortion. Is it that dark up Trump's ass?/----/ Too bad Shytface can't prove anything. Maybe you should testify.
You might want to get into a legal dictionary and see what elements are required for extortion. They aren't present in the call.
.
Who cares about the call? The call is just a single piece of evidence. One in which the big dummy couldn't close the deal and still got caught.
Evidence, opinions aren't evidence. Differences over policy aren't evidence either.
.
You fuckers are desperate. It's fucking fantastic.
Axios "fact check"?Fact check: What Joe and Hunter Biden actually did in UkraineLink to this approval of Biden's extortion to get a prosecutor fired for investigating his son's company?What Biden said was fully approved by Obama and both House and Congress. It was not to get them to spew BS so Clinton could win. Just so we know more facts here.So extortion is legal. Who knew?It wouldn't matter if there was. As Professor Dershowitz pointed out, there is no law against quid pro quo's in the statute. He looked up, down and sideways. Couldn't find one.
If you call that extortion, then what Biden did was worse, since what he did is what the commies are accusing Trump of doing.
Discussion of mod actions edited,
YEP, Above you can see. More weak USMB DOPer Mod editing of our factual posts.
