Offical Impeachment Thread

[Cellblock2429]

It is the transcript

False. It is a summary with parts left out. Literally everyone on the planet but you knows this. How embarrassing for you.

Let's ignore your lies and for the sake of this argument assume they are true..............

Why would you rely on "witnesses" who can only provide their feelings and opinions of that phone call because they were not on that phone call, and relied on what others told them?

/——/ Because, hearsay is all Shytface has. Nothing more.

 

[bripat9643]

It is the transcript

False. It is a summary with parts left out. Literally everyone on the planet but you knows this. How embarrassing for you.

Let's ignore your lies and for the sake of this argument assume they are true..............

Why would you rely on "witnesses" who can only provide their feelings and opinions of that phone call because they were not on that phone call, and relied on what others told them?

A judge wouldn't even allow these "witnesses" to be called to the stand.

 

[Billy_Bob]

THAT’S A WRAP: DEM WITNESS ADMITS UKRAINE ‘SHOULD’ INVESTIGATE BURISMA FOR PAYING BRIBE!!!

InfoWars ^ | 11/13/2019 | Jamie White

A witness brought forward by the Democrats to testify about Trump’s Ukraine phone call admitted that Ukraine officials should investigate Burisma Holdings for possibly bribing prosecutors to quash a probe into Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

During his opening statement on Wednesday, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent testified that he raised concerns to then-Vice President Biden about a conflict of interest involving Hunter Biden and Burisma Holdings

------------

Dimwits are PATHETIC..they wanted this because they know they cant beat Trump legit in 2020..and also because they need to stop Trump from putting in another Supreme Court Justice(Ginsberg is on her way out)..so what did we find out today in this hearing..that my brother in laws, brothers, housekeeper’s, cat has an opinion about something that no one can say is even impeachable..WOW so this is what our tax dollars are being used for..PATHETIC

Three different polls today of likely voters has the impeachment scam at 66-82% against and only 22-27% for... This is going to smash democrats next year in elections...

 

[Billy_Bob]

It is the transcript

False. It is a summary with parts left out. Literally everyone on the planet but you knows this. How embarrassing for you.

Let's ignore your lies and for the sake of this argument assume they are true..............

Why would you rely on "witnesses" who can only provide their feelings and opinions of that phone call because they were not on that phone call, and relied on what others told them?

A judge wouldn't even allow these "witnesses" to be called to the stand.

Its going to be very embarrassing when the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States questions these people. This case will be tossed in short order as unfounded.. Its going to be an ugly day in the Senate when the democrats are embarrassed this way..

 

[LoneLaugher]

Trump keeps saying "read the transcript", so his morons think it must be good for him.

It isn't. It shows that he was trying to work over the new Pres. of Ukraine. Period.

Quote the part where he was "trying to work over the new Pres. of Ukraine".

You have confused me with someone who will humor your stupidity.

 

[deannalw]

THAT’S A WRAP: DEM WITNESS ADMITS UKRAINE ‘SHOULD’ INVESTIGATE BURISMA FOR PAYING BRIBE!!!

InfoWars ^ | 11/13/2019 | Jamie White

A witness brought forward by the Democrats to testify about Trump’s Ukraine phone call admitted that Ukraine officials should investigate Burisma Holdings for possibly bribing prosecutors to quash a probe into Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

During his opening statement on Wednesday, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent testified that he raised concerns to then-Vice President Biden about a conflict of interest involving Hunter Biden and Burisma Holdings

------------

Dimwits are PATHETIC..they wanted this because they know they cant beat Trump legit in 2020..and also because they need to stop Trump from putting in another Supreme Court Justice(Ginsberg is on her way out)..so what did we find out today in this hearing..that my brother in laws, brothers, housekeeper’s, cat has an opinion about something that no one can say is even impeachable..WOW so this is what our tax dollars are being used for..PATHETIC

Three different polls today of likely voters has the impeachment scam at 66-82% against and only 22-27% for... This is going to smash democrats next year in elections...

This last poop pie to the democrats face is going to make them berserkers in a bigly way.

 

[OKTexas]

Silly question, for two reasons:

1) trump had already witheld the aid. So that was the existing state of affairs. He also did not have to state, in the phone call, that the sun rises in the east.

2) the phone call is only a small part of the body of evidence, which includes, in no small part, the cover up of the phone call

3) Zelensky and his aides either were already aware the aid was withheld, and/or had it confirmed a few days later. After all, they knew that the aid was approved, but didn't arrive at the time of the call. The goofs are telling us Zelensky and his staff would fail to connect the dots: "a favor, though". Hence no extortion. Because it isn't extortion if the target doesn't realize he has his fingernails pulled out to cough up the "deliverable".

Trump loves his marks, the "uneducated". On this thread, you can behold, in great detail, why that is.

Wow, great assumptions. LMAO

.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump keeps saying "read the transcript", so his morons think it must be good for him.

It isn't. It shows that he was trying to work over the new Pres. of Ukraine. Period.

No, because unlike people on the left, we know how to read and what words mean.

 

[Ame®icano]

WTF!?

View attachment 289696

These people get elected by educated voters. Uneducated vote for Republicans.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It is the transcript

False. It is a summary with parts left out. Literally everyone on the planet but you knows this. How embarrassing for you.

Edit: I stand corrected. Bripat the angry little babyman also doesn't know this.

Then let me tell you something you don't know: Since the Nixon administration, no presidential phone calls are recorded. They are typed out by a stenographer while the conversation is taking place. It's the stenographer that creates the transcript of all presidential conversations, not the President. It's the stenographer who determines what part of the conversation are worth recording and what part is blah-blah.

 

[Cellblock2429]

It is the transcript

False. It is a summary with parts left out. Literally everyone on the planet but you knows this. How embarrassing for you.

Edit: I stand corrected. Bripat the angry little babyman also doesn't know this.

/——/ You sound like the loud mouth at the cocktail party making the argument that the moon landing was faked.

 

[OKTexas]

It wouldn't matter if there was. As Professor Dershowitz pointed out, there is no law against quid pro quo's in the statute. He looked up, down and sideways. Couldn't find one.

So extortion is legal. Who knew?

If you call that extortion, then what Biden did was worse, since what he did is what the commies are accusing Trump of doing.

What Biden said was fully approved by Obama and both House and Congress. It was not to get them to spew BS so Clinton could win. Just so we know more facts here.
Discussion of mod actions edited

Really? When did Obama approve it? When did both houses of Congress approve it?

Prove it was not.

You can't prove an negative, idiot. It's on you to prove it was.

.

 

[Cellblock2429]

THAT’S A WRAP: DEM WITNESS ADMITS UKRAINE ‘SHOULD’ INVESTIGATE BURISMA FOR PAYING BRIBE!!!

InfoWars ^ | 11/13/2019 | Jamie White

A witness brought forward by the Democrats to testify about Trump’s Ukraine phone call admitted that Ukraine officials should investigate Burisma Holdings for possibly bribing prosecutors to quash a probe into Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

During his opening statement on Wednesday, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent testified that he raised concerns to then-Vice President Biden about a conflict of interest involving Hunter Biden and Burisma Holdings

------------

Dimwits are PATHETIC..they wanted this because they know they cant beat Trump legit in 2020..and also because they need to stop Trump from putting in another Supreme Court Justice(Ginsberg is on her way out)..so what did we find out today in this hearing..that my brother in laws, brothers, housekeeper’s, cat has an opinion about something that no one can say is even impeachable..WOW so this is what our tax dollars are being used for..PATHETIC

Three different polls today of likely voters has the impeachment scam at 66-82% against and only 22-27% for... This is going to smash democrats next year in elections...

/——/ Rumor floating around that Piglosi will shytcan the hearings this Friday.

 

[kyzr]

The democrats are really shooting themselves in the foot with women voters. The stupid Schiff hearings are on almost all of the daytime TV channels. My wife is really pissed about it. If the democrats piss off the women voters they are done. Most women could care less about politics, unless they fuck with their soap operas. My God she was mad!! I have at least one female Trump voter!!

 

[Agit8r]

It boils down to this: Are you going to believe people who have been career public servants, or someone who has a history of literally palling around with terrorists:

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

THAT’S A WRAP: DEM WITNESS ADMITS UKRAINE ‘SHOULD’ INVESTIGATE BURISMA FOR PAYING BRIBE!!!

InfoWars ^ | 11/13/2019 | Jamie White

A witness brought forward by the Democrats to testify about Trump’s Ukraine phone call admitted that Ukraine officials should investigate Burisma Holdings for possibly bribing prosecutors to quash a probe into Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

During his opening statement on Wednesday, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent testified that he raised concerns to then-Vice President Biden about a conflict of interest involving Hunter Biden and Burisma Holdings

------------

Dimwits are PATHETIC..they wanted this because they know they cant beat Trump legit in 2020..and also because they need to stop Trump from putting in another Supreme Court Justice(Ginsberg is on her way out)..so what did we find out today in this hearing..that my brother in laws, brothers, housekeeper’s, cat has an opinion about something that no one can say is even impeachable..WOW so this is what our tax dollars are being used for..PATHETIC

Three different polls today of likely voters has the impeachment scam at 66-82% against and only 22-27% for... This is going to smash democrats next year in elections...

/——/ Rumor floating around that Piglosi will shytcan the hearings this Friday.

That may be. Democrats are slaves to polls. It all depends on what the polls say by the end of tomorrow.

 

[MarathonMike]

It boils down to this: Are you going to believe people who have been career public servants, or someone who has a history of literally palling around with terrorists:

Career public servants? LOL The only thing career politicians serve is themselves. Wake up.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Day 1:

This may come back to bite dems but...is today's hearing pointless?

The reason I ask is, neither if these two had first hand knowledge, but only heard it from other people. That is hearsay. Now, during this portion of the events, it may make for a good show, but, hearsay is not admissible as evidence. What happens if it goes to trial in the senate, and they say that all these testimonies that rely on hearsay are to be disregarded?

Jim Jordan did make a good point to Taylor's, and that is, if he got his information second hand, how does he know the original source is not wrong, or got some facts wrong.

And I know some will say "but this is not a criminal court but a political court", doesnt matter, still cant use hearsay as evidence, people make up stuff all the time.

 

[007]

Day 1:

This may come back to bite dems but...is today's hearing pointless?

The reason I ask is, neither if these two had first hand knowledge, but only heard it from other people. That is hearsay. Now, during this portion of the events, it may make for a good show, but, hearsay is not admissible as evidence. What happens if it goes to trial in the senate, and they say that all these testimonies that rely on hearsay are to be disregarded?

Jim Jordan did make a good point to Taylor's, and that is, if he got his information second hand, how does he know the original source is not wrong, or got some facts wrong.

And I know some will say "but this is not a criminal court but a political court", doesnt matter, still cant use hearsay as evidence, people make up stuff all the time.

That is correct. In a court of law, neither of these two star witnesses today would have even been allowed in the doors.

And they are best the dems had.

This entire WITCH HUNT / COUP - Part II is a FARCE, just like the Meuller witch hunt, and it IS, blowing up in the dems face, AGAIN, BIG TIME.

 

[Nostra]

It is the transcript

False. It is a summary with parts left out. Literally everyone on the planet but you knows this. How embarrassing for you.

Let's ignore your lies and for the sake of this argument assume they are true..............

Why would you rely on "witnesses" who can only provide their feelings and opinions of that phone call because they were not on that phone call, and relied on what others told them?

A judge wouldn't even allow these "witnesses" to be called to the stand.

And yet...........these are Schifferbrain's STAR WITNESSES