Official Coronavirus Thread - Up to the minute Coronavirus map and count.

[sarahgop]

Got this from Mark Levine. Birx already has admitted corona is the default code to be used.

Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
·
16h
Replying to
@marklevinshow
2. It emphatically provides that doctors are to enter the COVID19 code when recording the cause of death even whether it may not be the main cause of death or is the suspected cause of death. It is the default code to be used.

 

[U2Edge]

A HUGE one-day drop in projections.

4-7:
US projection, @ peak (15 APR)
shortage of beds: 36654
shortage of ICU beds 16323
Total death projections thru 4 AUG: 81766,
Range: 49131-136401 (+/- 40%)

4-8:
US projection, @ peak (11 APR)
shortage of beds: 15852
shortage of ICU beds 9047
Total death projections thru 4 AUG: 60415
Range: 31221-126703 (+/- 48%)

IHME | COVID-19 Projections

Great news! I hope the projections continue to improve!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Here's what I really believe..

But you have zero education or experience in any relevant field. ...

And you?

What difference does that make? I am not expressing a belief contrary to the career experts. Please pay attention.

 

[Likkmee]

A HUGE one-day drop in projections.

4-7:
US projection, @ peak (15 APR)
shortage of beds: 36654
shortage of ICU beds 16323
Total death projections thru 4 AUG: 81766,
Range: 49131-136401 (+/- 40%)

4-8:
US projection, @ peak (11 APR)
shortage of beds: 15852
shortage of ICU beds 9047
Total death projections thru 4 AUG: 60415
Range: 31221-126703 (+/- 48%)

IHME | COVID-19 Projections

Great news! I hope the projections continue to improve!

YAY !
Iceland’s early coronavirus testing model shows 50% of cases have no symptoms

 

[XponentialChaos]

You're the one who brought it up, not me. Maybe you should have read it more carefully. The 1.7 million was a worst case scenario.,

A model should list the different scenarios.

What do you think a worst-case scenario means?

Do nothing? That's an option. Like I'm going to do with your dumb question.

Another option is for you to read and understand the things you reference.

You're complaining about something being inaccurate when it was specifically stated that it was a worst-case scenario.

 

[XponentialChaos]

there's nothing there. so how can I see that which isn't?

You're definitely confused again.

 

[XponentialChaos]

You're the one who brought it up, not me. Maybe you should have read it more carefully. The 1.7 million was a worst case scenario.,

A model should list the different scenarios.

What do you think a worst-case scenario means?

one scenario?

Good job!

 

[XponentialChaos]

Definitely. You're seeing things that aren't there again.

What are your death numbers now?

I check here.

COVID Live - Coronavirus Statistics - Worldometer

Live statistics and coronavirus news tracking the number of confirmed cases, recovered patients, tests, and death toll due to the COVID-19 coronavirus from Wuhan, China. Coronavirus counter with new cases, deaths, and number of tests per 1 Million population. Historical data and info. Daily...

www.worldometers.info

I mean your projected numbers based on your model. If you go by Dr. Fauci, then he had 100K to 200K as his latest numbers. Before that, he was saying something like 1.7 M deaths.

I don't know. I have not looked at them.

If you look at Dr. Fauci's numbers, then he had 1.7 M deaths early on. The latest is 100,00 - 200,000. Even that might be too high.

I estimated 15,000 - 20,000 deaths by Easter based on the number of deaths last week. Fauci had to estimate the entire number of deaths, so had a more difficult job but he had his model.

Now, his 100K - 200K could be overstated, too.

'(CNN)An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

As of Monday, the model predicted the virus will kill 81,766 people in the United States over the next four months, with just under 141,000 hospital beds being needed. That's about 12,000 fewer deaths -- and 121,000 fewer hospital beds -- than the model estimated on Thursday.

A "massive infusion of new data" led to the adjustments, according to the model's maker, Dr. Christopher Murray, who serves as director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington School of Medicine.'

Revised coronavirus model predicts fewer deaths, but tens of thousands in US still expected to die by August | CNN

An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

www.cnn.com

It's no wonder people don't believe this COVID-19 to be as serious since we do not know about total confirmed numbers because of faulty testing. It could be higher if the second wave theory is correct.

Maybe Sweden isn't as wacky as other countries thought they were. I dunno.

The 1.7 million was probably assuming that nothing was done.

yeah, no. that's merely convenient. it was wrong, and it compromised our country. no excuse for that. none.

It was a worst-case scenario. Maybe you should have read that part.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Today is going to be bad in terms of deaths. Hopefully the number of new cases doesn't go into the 30 thousands.

Well, today sucks.

1,952 deaths.
33,319 new cases.

Still 89 k short , you should root harder

Yep. They made promises. They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

It was a worst-case scenario. Maybe you should have read that part

No, it was not.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Today is going to be bad in terms of deaths. Hopefully the number of new cases doesn't go into the 30 thousands.

Well, today sucks.

1,952 deaths.
33,319 new cases.

Still 89 k short , you should root harder

Yep. They made promises. They said 100k to 240k by Monday and that would be BEST CASE even if we do everything the tards demand.

Do you have a link to support that?

 

[XponentialChaos]

It was a worst-case scenario. Maybe you should have read that part

No, it was not.

Fauci predicts up to 200,000 U.S. deaths as Trump weighs adjusting coronavirus guidelines. Here is what you should know.

As Trump considers easing social distancing guidelines, health expert Anthony Fauci says millions will contract coronavirus, up to 200,000 may die.

www.usatoday.com

Fauci: Worst-case coronavirus predictions ‘unlikely if we do the kinds of things that we’re essentially outlining right now’

Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said Sunday that the steps the U.S. is taking to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus will likely mean the …

thehill.com

"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention projected a worst-case scenario of 160 million to 210 million cases by December. Under that forecast, 21 million people would need hospitalization and 200,000 to 1.7 million could die by the end of the year. Health officials have cautioned that the models of infection rate vary widely."

 

[XponentialChaos]

 

[jc456]

there's nothing there. so how can I see that which isn't?

You're definitely confused again.

thanks for your projection.

 

[XponentialChaos]

there's nothing there. so how can I see that which isn't?

You're definitely confused again.

thanks for your projection.

I understand that you need to be re-directed. You're welcome.

 

[jc456]

Definitely. You're seeing things that aren't there again.

What are your death numbers now?

I check here.

COVID Live - Coronavirus Statistics - Worldometer

Live statistics and coronavirus news tracking the number of confirmed cases, recovered patients, tests, and death toll due to the COVID-19 coronavirus from Wuhan, China. Coronavirus counter with new cases, deaths, and number of tests per 1 Million population. Historical data and info. Daily...

www.worldometers.info

I mean your projected numbers based on your model. If you go by Dr. Fauci, then he had 100K to 200K as his latest numbers. Before that, he was saying something like 1.7 M deaths.

I don't know. I have not looked at them.

If you look at Dr. Fauci's numbers, then he had 1.7 M deaths early on. The latest is 100,00 - 200,000. Even that might be too high.

I estimated 15,000 - 20,000 deaths by Easter based on the number of deaths last week. Fauci had to estimate the entire number of deaths, so had a more difficult job but he had his model.

Now, his 100K - 200K could be overstated, too.

'(CNN)An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

As of Monday, the model predicted the virus will kill 81,766 people in the United States over the next four months, with just under 141,000 hospital beds being needed. That's about 12,000 fewer deaths -- and 121,000 fewer hospital beds -- than the model estimated on Thursday.

A "massive infusion of new data" led to the adjustments, according to the model's maker, Dr. Christopher Murray, who serves as director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington School of Medicine.'

Revised coronavirus model predicts fewer deaths, but tens of thousands in US still expected to die by August | CNN

An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

www.cnn.com

It's no wonder people don't believe this COVID-19 to be as serious since we do not know about total confirmed numbers because of faulty testing. It could be higher if the second wave theory is correct.

Maybe Sweden isn't as wacky as other countries thought they were. I dunno.

The 1.7 million was probably assuming that nothing was done.

yeah, no. that's merely convenient. it was wrong, and it compromised our country. no excuse for that. none.

It was a worst-case scenario. Maybe you should have read that part.

and no other scenario was presented. that was the point.

 

[jc456]

there's nothing there. so how can I see that which isn't?

You're definitely confused again.

thanks for your projection.

I understand that you need to be re-directed. You're welcome.

no need, I know you're confused.

 

[XponentialChaos]

So far 1,373 deaths and 10,605 cases. Several states haven't reported deaths yet.

It's going to be another high death date, probably around 2,000 again. Hopefully new cases can hold to under 30,000.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Definitely. You're seeing things that aren't there again.

What are your death numbers now?

I check here.

COVID Live - Coronavirus Statistics - Worldometer

Live statistics and coronavirus news tracking the number of confirmed cases, recovered patients, tests, and death toll due to the COVID-19 coronavirus from Wuhan, China. Coronavirus counter with new cases, deaths, and number of tests per 1 Million population. Historical data and info. Daily...

www.worldometers.info

I mean your projected numbers based on your model. If you go by Dr. Fauci, then he had 100K to 200K as his latest numbers. Before that, he was saying something like 1.7 M deaths.

I don't know. I have not looked at them.

If you look at Dr. Fauci's numbers, then he had 1.7 M deaths early on. The latest is 100,00 - 200,000. Even that might be too high.

I estimated 15,000 - 20,000 deaths by Easter based on the number of deaths last week. Fauci had to estimate the entire number of deaths, so had a more difficult job but he had his model.

Now, his 100K - 200K could be overstated, too.

'(CNN)An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

As of Monday, the model predicted the virus will kill 81,766 people in the United States over the next four months, with just under 141,000 hospital beds being needed. That's about 12,000 fewer deaths -- and 121,000 fewer hospital beds -- than the model estimated on Thursday.

A "massive infusion of new data" led to the adjustments, according to the model's maker, Dr. Christopher Murray, who serves as director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington School of Medicine.'

Revised coronavirus model predicts fewer deaths, but tens of thousands in US still expected to die by August | CNN

An influential model tracking the coronavirus pandemic in the United States now predicts that fewer people will die and fewer hospital beds will be needed compared to its estimates from last week.

www.cnn.com

It's no wonder people don't believe this COVID-19 to be as serious since we do not know about total confirmed numbers because of faulty testing. It could be higher if the second wave theory is correct.

Maybe Sweden isn't as wacky as other countries thought they were. I dunno.

The 1.7 million was probably assuming that nothing was done.

yeah, no. that's merely convenient. it was wrong, and it compromised our country. no excuse for that. none.

It was a worst-case scenario. Maybe you should have read that part.

and no other scenario was presented. that was the point.

That's not true. Have your specialist read this link to you.

Fauci predicts up to 200,000 U.S. deaths as Trump weighs adjusting coronavirus guidelines. Here is what you should know.

As Trump considers easing social distancing guidelines, health expert Anthony Fauci says millions will contract coronavirus, up to 200,000 may die.

www.usatoday.com

 

[Carl in Michigan]

100k to 240k deaths IF WE ALL OBEY OUR MASTERS. That number is BEST CASE SCENARIO

They were wildly wrong. We all know it.

first minute: