SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
Sorry I couldn't find anything I misinterpreted.Learn to read and it will become obvious...What did I interpret?False generalization fallacy.Care to hazard a guess as to how many opinions that had been accepted for just as long or longer were found to be wrong?
Your opinion on thermodynamics has absolutely no observed measured actual evidence. You have never shown it. The basics of thermodynamics has been proven many times.Whoever is right is right regardless of who holds what opinion. The fact that thousands BELIEVE means exactly squat. Let’s see the observed measured actual evidence...not the misunderstood “evidence” that is good enough to fool people with a blinding bias.
More “interpretations of what I actuallly said...learn to read...get back to me when you can argue against what I actually said...I will check back periodically...
.
This is my favorite correct interpretation of your opinion of thermodynamics.
- No radiation process on earth is spontaneous since all radiation processes use prior absorbed energy.
- Therefore no radiation process violates the statement,
Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.- That means radiation from any object can be absorbed by any object at any temperature.
.
Of course not...because you can't read...