- Banned
- #521
Yeah, I see something wrong. I see a partisan witch hunt. I see an agent being called "covert" who doesn't meet the criteria. I see an agent being called covert 3 years after being pulled from the field when CIA SOP for maintaining cover is 2 years.
I see a woman who used her position to get her hubby a job, and he had to run his mouth so bad that HE brought attention down on himself; thus, his wife; yet you lefties INSIST on blaming Republicans.
I see a trivial conviction as a face-saving justification for existence that has nothing to do with the charges. In fact, no one has been charged nor convicted for blowing Plame's cover.
I see lefties wanting to convict Republicans for blowing Plame's cover; yet, refuse to accept the legal definition of "covert" as the defining factor.
You betcha I see something wrong.
according to what I have seen, she may have been "pulled from the field" three years prior, but had made several official trips overseas during that time.
Fighting over the legalese is a smoke screen. The DCI has said that she was covert. The DCI has said that disclosing her identity HURT our nation's intelligence efforts. Someone inside the Bush administration revealed her identity to the press. Either the person did it for nefarious partisan purposes or they were a bumbling idiot. Either way, someone should be held to account for doing so.