Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All across this country, we have red white and puke white mf's wanting their country black, I mean back.....all hollering for the gov. to get out of their way, their lives, etc....hate hate hate the gov.....BUT WILL NOT HESITATE TO RALLY BEHIND UNCLE SAM WHEN IT COMES TO TELLING A WOMAN WHAT SHE CAN AND CAN NOT DO WITH HER OWN FUCKIN BODY!!
HYPOCRITES TO THE FUCKIN CORE....THESE SAME GIVE A FUCK LICE BALLS, SHIT ALL OVER THE POOR, COULD GIVE A RATS FUCK ABOUT MINORITY BABIES AND THE FIRST TO SNATCH A CRUM OUT OF TODDLERS MOUTH, IF IT WAS BOUGHT WITH FOOD STAMPS...YOU PEOPLE ARE PATHETIC!!
Not even close. Gosnell operated a perfectly legal abortion clinic. At some point he even passed a state inspection.The Gosnell case: Here’s what you need to know
The FBI and the Pennsylvania Department of Health raided Gosnell's clinic on Feb. 18, 2010. What they found inside was described by those on the raid as "filthy" and disgusting":
There was blood on the floor. A stench of urine filled the air. A flea-infested cat was wandering through the facility, and there were cat feces on the stairs. Semi-conscious women scheduled for abortions were moaning in the waiting room or the recovery room, where they sat on dirty recliners covered with blood-stained blankets.
This all sounds pleasant does it not?
And all that happened because Philadelphia had restrictive abortion laws. When it's legal, its cleaner and safer.
He was able to do what he did without complaint from his clients because of and only because of Philadelphia's ban on abortion after the 24th week. That's an unquestionable fact.
Whatever the defect was, it's been cured. Kill those black babies!
The defect is with society, making life so difficult for many single mothers.
Texas should secede and be done with it. Good riddance.
Texas, along with 10 others, tried that once because the federal government was doing then what it's doing now and acting beyond it's authority.
Texas took this case to the supreme court after is was dismiss by a lower court, so no the court was not acting beyond their authority.
A woman's privacy and her body is her own. She has a reasonable right to accessible health care for services she want and treatment she chooses.
She already has that via clinics and hospitals and doctor's offices.
If we are going to fund abortions, then abortion clinics should be accountable just like any other medical practioner's office, and the same degree of oversight should exist.
As they are now, there is no guarantee of safety. Yank the federal funding, and use it to fund services provided by licensed professionals in good standing, who aren't exploiting and abusing women.
you don't fund abortions, not since '76
Most hospitals will not perform abortions unless it for the life of the woman. Doctor's offices usually won't do them either. Many offices are not equip for outpatient procedures.
Clinics can do procedures without the crippling cost of a hospital.
Abortions are out of pocket costs for the woman. A hospital would it would be $5000 or more for the surgery and the techs would bill separately on top of that.
insurance does not cover except if require before other treatment is necessary or to save the woman's life.
Many hospitals will send a woman to a clinic instead for the procedure before chemo or other treatments.
Wrong. There are situations where tax money is used to fund abortions. In many of the policies sold on the Obamacare exchanges, coverage for abortion is included along with contraceptives. That you say "you don't fund abortions" is false and a sign you don't know how insurance works. I don't care what the reason is for, if one person is paying a price of any sort to fund abortion, it's wrong.
If whether or not to have an abortion is the sole choice of the woman, why are there cases where taxes pay a dime. It's still a choice and still her responsibility, not someone else's. PERIOD.
Then choose to pay for it. Don't ask me to pay for it. Are we good?Texas, along with 10 others, tried that once because the federal government was doing then what it's doing now and acting beyond it's authority.
Texas took this case to the supreme court after is was dismiss by a lower court, so no the court was not acting beyond their authority.
A woman's privacy and her body is her own. She has a reasonable right to accessible health care for services she want and treatment she chooses.
She already has that via clinics and hospitals and doctor's offices.
If we are going to fund abortions, then abortion clinics should be accountable just like any other medical practioner's office, and the same degree of oversight should exist.
As they are now, there is no guarantee of safety. Yank the federal funding, and use it to fund services provided by licensed professionals in good standing, who aren't exploiting and abusing women.
you don't fund abortions, not since '76
Most hospitals will not perform abortions unless it for the life of the woman. Doctor's offices usually won't do them either. Many offices are not equip for outpatient procedures.
Clinics can do procedures without the crippling cost of a hospital.
Abortions are out of pocket costs for the woman. A hospital would it would be $5000 or more for the surgery and the techs would bill separately on top of that.
insurance does not cover except if require before other treatment is necessary or to save the woman's life.
Many hospitals will send a woman to a clinic instead for the procedure before chemo or other treatments.
Wrong. There are situations where tax money is used to fund abortions. In many of the policies sold on the Obamacare exchanges, coverage for abortion is included along with contraceptives. That you say "you don't fund abortions" is false and a sign you don't know how insurance works. I don't care what the reason is for, if one person is paying a price of any sort to fund abortion, it's wrong.
If whether or not to have an abortion is the sole choice of the woman, why are there cases where taxes pay a dime. It's still a choice and still her responsibility, not someone else's. PERIOD.
insurance does not cover abortions.
it is an out of pocket cost for the woman. Some clinics are offering chemical abortion for free but a sonogram is required to verify the weeks so the right cocktail is given, follow up exam required two week later to know if it was complete. Pills are taken over two days at home to induce a miscarriage.
apart from rape, no government fund are used for abortions.
Insurance in some cases will cover late term for life saving reasons. Woman might have to have it done at a clinic
Many drugs and treatments would harm fetus so an abortion is required before treatment can begin.
There are cases like Rh where a fetus is incompatible with a woman.
Now we have seen infant affected by Zika which causes brain abnormalities, where the infant would suffer and live only a short time. in a few more mild cases the child would have to go through brain surgery every few months but the child would never be normal but might function into their teens with special aid. Abortion is a kindness.
Without knowing the circumstances and all options, only the woman can make such a choice. no one should make abortion out of reach or criminal/sinful It is a private choice.
Well let's take away women's rights and make them totally dependent upon males like they did when they didn't encourage sex before marriage,,,,But it still happened..Not even close. Gosnell operated a perfectly legal abortion clinic. At some point he even passed a state inspection.And all that happened because Philadelphia had restrictive abortion laws. When it's legal, its cleaner and safer.
He was able to do what he did without complaint from his clients because of and only because of Philadelphia's ban on abortion after the 24th week. That's an unquestionable fact.
Whatever the defect was, it's been cured. Kill those black babies!
The defect is with society, making life so difficult for many single mothers.
The defect is with society, encouraging women to have sex before they're married and prepared to raise children.
Then choose to pay for it. Don't ask me to pay for it. Are we good?Texas took this case to the supreme court after is was dismiss by a lower court, so no the court was not acting beyond their authority.
A woman's privacy and her body is her own. She has a reasonable right to accessible health care for services she want and treatment she chooses.
She already has that via clinics and hospitals and doctor's offices.
If we are going to fund abortions, then abortion clinics should be accountable just like any other medical practioner's office, and the same degree of oversight should exist.
As they are now, there is no guarantee of safety. Yank the federal funding, and use it to fund services provided by licensed professionals in good standing, who aren't exploiting and abusing women.
you don't fund abortions, not since '76
Most hospitals will not perform abortions unless it for the life of the woman. Doctor's offices usually won't do them either. Many offices are not equip for outpatient procedures.
Clinics can do procedures without the crippling cost of a hospital.
Abortions are out of pocket costs for the woman. A hospital would it would be $5000 or more for the surgery and the techs would bill separately on top of that.
insurance does not cover except if require before other treatment is necessary or to save the woman's life.
Many hospitals will send a woman to a clinic instead for the procedure before chemo or other treatments.
Wrong. There are situations where tax money is used to fund abortions. In many of the policies sold on the Obamacare exchanges, coverage for abortion is included along with contraceptives. That you say "you don't fund abortions" is false and a sign you don't know how insurance works. I don't care what the reason is for, if one person is paying a price of any sort to fund abortion, it's wrong.
If whether or not to have an abortion is the sole choice of the woman, why are there cases where taxes pay a dime. It's still a choice and still her responsibility, not someone else's. PERIOD.
insurance does not cover abortions.
it is an out of pocket cost for the woman. Some clinics are offering chemical abortion for free but a sonogram is required to verify the weeks so the right cocktail is given, follow up exam required two week later to know if it was complete. Pills are taken over two days at home to induce a miscarriage.
apart from rape, no government fund are used for abortions.
Insurance in some cases will cover late term for life saving reasons. Woman might have to have it done at a clinic
Many drugs and treatments would harm fetus so an abortion is required before treatment can begin.
There are cases like Rh where a fetus is incompatible with a woman.
Now we have seen infant affected by Zika which causes brain abnormalities, where the infant would suffer and live only a short time. in a few more mild cases the child would have to go through brain surgery every few months but the child would never be normal but might function into their teens with special aid. Abortion is a kindness.
Without knowing the circumstances and all options, only the woman can make such a choice. no one should make abortion out of reach or criminal/sinful It is a private choice.
Well let's take away women's rights and make them totally dependent upon males like they did when they didn't encourage sex before marriage,,,,But it still happened..Not even close. Gosnell operated a perfectly legal abortion clinic. At some point he even passed a state inspection.
He was able to do what he did without complaint from his clients because of and only because of Philadelphia's ban on abortion after the 24th week. That's an unquestionable fact.
Whatever the defect was, it's been cured. Kill those black babies!
The defect is with society, making life so difficult for many single mothers.
The defect is with society, encouraging women to have sex before they're married and prepared to raise children.
Oh good, supremes ruled men can continue to abuse women via legal back alley abortionsWell let's take away women's rights and make them totally dependent upon males like they did when they didn't encourage sex before marriage,,,,But it still happened..He was able to do what he did without complaint from his clients because of and only because of Philadelphia's ban on abortion after the 24th week. That's an unquestionable fact.
Whatever the defect was, it's been cured. Kill those black babies!
The defect is with society, making life so difficult for many single mothers.
The defect is with society, encouraging women to have sex before they're married and prepared to raise children.
Their right to be abused by non-qualified clinicians in un-monitored back alley abortion clinics, you mean?
Oh good, supremes ruled men can continue to abuse women via legal back alley abortionsWell let's take away women's rights and make them totally dependent upon males like they did when they didn't encourage sex before marriage,,,,But it still happened..Whatever the defect was, it's been cured. Kill those black babies!
The defect is with society, making life so difficult for many single mothers.
The defect is with society, encouraging women to have sex before they're married and prepared to raise children.
Their right to be abused by non-qualified clinicians in un-monitored back alley abortion clinics, you mean?
Oh good, supremes ruled men can continue to abuse women via legal back alley abortionsWell let's take away women's rights and make them totally dependent upon males like they did when they didn't encourage sex before marriage,,,,But it still happened..The defect is with society, making life so difficult for many single mothers.
The defect is with society, encouraging women to have sex before they're married and prepared to raise children.
Their right to be abused by non-qualified clinicians in un-monitored back alley abortion clinics, you mean?
Exactly.
