But the op suggested that "scientist believe that science is infalliable".
No, the OP suggests that the public has been conditioned by the media and the educational cesspool that Scientists are infallible, the new priest class to never be questioned.
Idiots like Mullah Photo have simply substituted blind faith in the new priests for blind faith in the old ones. Nothing has changed, there is no thought nor intellectual curiosity, it's still unwavering adherence to dogma.
Ergo the observation that science is a process, not a result.
When a malleable public is conditioned to accept that which they are told, it is religion.
What is passed for science in this nation is mostly religion.
How is my flailing, by the way?
It's wild, man.
And yet, with every letter you type, you become more and more a hypocrite.
Well....since you bring up hypocrites...
When scientists appeal to various unobservable entities- universal forces, grand symmetries, twice-differential functions as in mechanics, Calabi-Yau manifolds, ionic bonds, or quantum fields- the shovel is in plain sight, but what is about to be shoveled is nowhere to be seen. Why physicists should enjoy inferential advantages denied theologians is not explained. Berlinski, Devils Delusion, p. 143.
Again...Why physicists should enjoy inferential advantages denied theologians is not explained.