OH NO! Bernie say it ain't so!..If elected he's bringing a "A Vast Sea of Debt!"

[Vigilante]

Townhall.com ^ | September 22, 2015 | Paul Greenberg
You won't find it on any map; it probably wouldn't fit. But the Wall Street Journal's staff has done its best to trace the outlines of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders' spending plans. Which isn't easy. Because this sea of debt is not just big but huge, immense, and no sea of tranquility, either. It's full of turbulent wave after wave of mounting debt. It includes proposals for a government-run health-care program ($15 trillion over the next decade); plans to build new highways, bridges and roads, and rebuild old ones; a vast expansion of Social Security, and free tuition at every...

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Top Economist Says Bernie’s Plan Will Actually SAVE the US $5 Trillion

On Monday, the Wall Street Journal published an article claiming that presidential candidate Bernie Sanders “backs $18 trillion in new spending over a decade.” Since then, multiple media outlets have refuted that claim with a litany of facts and basic policy changes which could make the actual cost for his proposed programs negligible by replacing current government programs that are bloated and inefficient.


Accurate or not, the $18 trillion figure has immediately conjured images of red flags bearing the likeness of Karl Marx waving over crowded plazas filled with American citizens standing in line all day to buy eight-dollar rolls of government toilet paper. It was intended to scare people and tell them that Sanders intends to spend America into bankruptcy.


But would he?


Bernie Sanders is confident that his brand of “Democratic Socialism” could replace our current system of “Corporate Welfare.”


In 2013 tax payers doled out $217 billion in subsidies and tax breaks to corporations. In return they got flat wages, as well as higher housing costs and health care.


So what does a Sanders solution look like?

Read the rest at the link.

 

[Vigilante]

Top Economist Says Bernie’s Plan Will Actually SAVE the US $5 Trillion

On Monday, the Wall Street Journal published an article claiming that presidential candidate Bernie Sanders “backs $18 trillion in new spending over a decade.” Since then, multiple media outlets have refuted that claim with a litany of facts and basic policy changes which could make the actual cost for his proposed programs negligible by replacing current government programs that are bloated and inefficient.


Accurate or not, the $18 trillion figure has immediately conjured images of red flags bearing the likeness of Karl Marx waving over crowded plazas filled with American citizens standing in line all day to buy eight-dollar rolls of government toilet paper. It was intended to scare people and tell them that Sanders intends to spend America into bankruptcy.


But would he?


Bernie Sanders is confident that his brand of “Democratic Socialism” could replace our current system of “Corporate Welfare.”


In 2013 tax payers doled out $217 billion in subsidies and tax breaks to corporations. In return they got flat wages, as well as higher housing costs and health care.


So what does a Sanders solution look like?

Read the rest at the link.

Also cost us $147 BILLION for ILLEGAL ALIENS!!!!!

 

[Luddly Neddite]

 

[Luddly Neddite]

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Top Economist Says Bernie’s Plan Will Actually SAVE the US $5 Trillion

On Monday, the Wall Street Journal published an article claiming that presidential candidate Bernie Sanders “backs $18 trillion in new spending over a decade.” Since then, multiple media outlets have refuted that claim with a litany of facts and basic policy changes which could make the actual cost for his proposed programs negligible by replacing current government programs that are bloated and inefficient.


Accurate or not, the $18 trillion figure has immediately conjured images of red flags bearing the likeness of Karl Marx waving over crowded plazas filled with American citizens standing in line all day to buy eight-dollar rolls of government toilet paper. It was intended to scare people and tell them that Sanders intends to spend America into bankruptcy.


But would he?


Bernie Sanders is confident that his brand of “Democratic Socialism” could replace our current system of “Corporate Welfare.”


In 2013 tax payers doled out $217 billion in subsidies and tax breaks to corporations. In return they got flat wages, as well as higher housing costs and health care.


So what does a Sanders solution look like?

Read the rest at the link.

Top LIBERAL HACKS say......

 

[Obiwan]

http://insurance.about.com/od/DisInc/a/Social-Security-Insolvent-In-2017.html

The economic downturn and slow recovery have caused numerous individuals to file a claim for federal disability benefits through Social Security's disability program with applications for benefit claims.

The run of disability applications, the federal governmment admits, is pushing the financially strapped system toward the brink of insolvency.


The lengthy recession has had a serious impact on disability applicaions. Claims for disability benefits typically increase in a bad economy because many disabled people get laid off and can't find a new job. This year, about 3.3 million people are expected to apply for federal disability benefits. That's 700,000 more than in 2008 and 1 million more than a decade ago.

Individuals who qualify for Social Security disability automatically get Medicare after two years, even if they are younger than 65, the age when other retirees qualify for the government-run health insurance program.

Today, about 13.6 million people receive disability benefits through Social Security or Supplemental Security Income. Social Security is for people with substantial work histories, and monthly disability payments average $927. Supplemental Security Income does not require a work history but it has strict limits on income and assets. Monthly SSI payments average $500.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Top Economist Says Bernie’s Plan Will Actually SAVE the US $5 Trillion

On Monday, the Wall Street Journal published an article claiming that presidential candidate Bernie Sanders “backs $18 trillion in new spending over a decade.” Since then, multiple media outlets have refuted that claim with a litany of facts and basic policy changes which could make the actual cost for his proposed programs negligible by replacing current government programs that are bloated and inefficient.


Accurate or not, the $18 trillion figure has immediately conjured images of red flags bearing the likeness of Karl Marx waving over crowded plazas filled with American citizens standing in line all day to buy eight-dollar rolls of government toilet paper. It was intended to scare people and tell them that Sanders intends to spend America into bankruptcy.


But would he?


Bernie Sanders is confident that his brand of “Democratic Socialism” could replace our current system of “Corporate Welfare.”


In 2013 tax payers doled out $217 billion in subsidies and tax breaks to corporations. In return they got flat wages, as well as higher housing costs and health care.


So what does a Sanders solution look like?

Read the rest at the link.

Top LIBERAL HACKS say......

WSJ?

You're kidding, right?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Top Economist Says Bernie’s Plan Will Actually SAVE the US $5 Trillion

On Monday, the Wall Street Journal published an article claiming that presidential candidate Bernie Sanders “backs $18 trillion in new spending over a decade.” Since then, multiple media outlets have refuted that claim with a litany of facts and basic policy changes which could make the actual cost for his proposed programs negligible by replacing current government programs that are bloated and inefficient.


Accurate or not, the $18 trillion figure has immediately conjured images of red flags bearing the likeness of Karl Marx waving over crowded plazas filled with American citizens standing in line all day to buy eight-dollar rolls of government toilet paper. It was intended to scare people and tell them that Sanders intends to spend America into bankruptcy.


But would he?


Bernie Sanders is confident that his brand of “Democratic Socialism” could replace our current system of “Corporate Welfare.”


In 2013 tax payers doled out $217 billion in subsidies and tax breaks to corporations. In return they got flat wages, as well as higher housing costs and health care.


So what does a Sanders solution look like?

Read the rest at the link.

Top LIBERAL HACKS say......

WSJ?

You're kidding, right?

I was talking about YOU dunbass

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Top Economist Says Bernie’s Plan Will Actually SAVE the US $5 Trillion

On Monday, the Wall Street Journal published an article claiming that presidential candidate Bernie Sanders “backs $18 trillion in new spending over a decade.” Since then, multiple media outlets have refuted that claim with a litany of facts and basic policy changes which could make the actual cost for his proposed programs negligible by replacing current government programs that are bloated and inefficient.


Accurate or not, the $18 trillion figure has immediately conjured images of red flags bearing the likeness of Karl Marx waving over crowded plazas filled with American citizens standing in line all day to buy eight-dollar rolls of government toilet paper. It was intended to scare people and tell them that Sanders intends to spend America into bankruptcy.


But would he?


Bernie Sanders is confident that his brand of “Democratic Socialism” could replace our current system of “Corporate Welfare.”


In 2013 tax payers doled out $217 billion in subsidies and tax breaks to corporations. In return they got flat wages, as well as higher housing costs and health care.


So what does a Sanders solution look like?

Read the rest at the link.

You have to be an idiot to believe this. Remember the obiecare will save everyone $2500 days? Yeah, those were the good days. The days that never came and everyone got butt fucked. No government program will ever cost as little or provide as much as the assholes say it will to get you dumbed down enough to vote for it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Sanders is nuts

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Top Economist Says Bernie’s Plan Will Actually SAVE the US $5 Trillion

On Monday, the Wall Street Journal published an article claiming that presidential candidate Bernie Sanders “backs $18 trillion in new spending over a decade.” Since then, multiple media outlets have refuted that claim with a litany of facts and basic policy changes which could make the actual cost for his proposed programs negligible by replacing current government programs that are bloated and inefficient.


Accurate or not, the $18 trillion figure has immediately conjured images of red flags bearing the likeness of Karl Marx waving over crowded plazas filled with American citizens standing in line all day to buy eight-dollar rolls of government toilet paper. It was intended to scare people and tell them that Sanders intends to spend America into bankruptcy.


But would he?


Bernie Sanders is confident that his brand of “Democratic Socialism” could replace our current system of “Corporate Welfare.”


In 2013 tax payers doled out $217 billion in subsidies and tax breaks to corporations. In return they got flat wages, as well as higher housing costs and health care.


So what does a Sanders solution look like?

Read the rest at the link.

You have to be an idiot to believe this. Remember the obiecare will save everyone $2500 days? Yeah, those were the good days. The days that never came and everyone got butt fucked. No government program will ever cost as little or provide as much as the assholes say it will to get you dumbed down enough to vote for it.

Gruber was an optimist

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Top Economist Says Bernie’s Plan Will Actually SAVE the US $5 Trillion

On Monday, the Wall Street Journal published an article claiming that presidential candidate Bernie Sanders “backs $18 trillion in new spending over a decade.” Since then, multiple media outlets have refuted that claim with a litany of facts and basic policy changes which could make the actual cost for his proposed programs negligible by replacing current government programs that are bloated and inefficient.


Accurate or not, the $18 trillion figure has immediately conjured images of red flags bearing the likeness of Karl Marx waving over crowded plazas filled with American citizens standing in line all day to buy eight-dollar rolls of government toilet paper. It was intended to scare people and tell them that Sanders intends to spend America into bankruptcy.


But would he?


Bernie Sanders is confident that his brand of “Democratic Socialism” could replace our current system of “Corporate Welfare.”


In 2013 tax payers doled out $217 billion in subsidies and tax breaks to corporations. In return they got flat wages, as well as higher housing costs and health care.


So what does a Sanders solution look like?

Read the rest at the link.

You have to be an idiot to believe this. Remember the obiecare will save everyone $2500 days? Yeah, those were the good days. The days that never came and everyone got butt fucked. No government program will ever cost as little or provide as much as the assholes say it will to get you dumbed down enough to vote for it.

Gruber was an optimist

He was just a plain old liar and knew what he had to lie about to get fools like Lud to get behind it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

War is peace
Ignorance is strength
Spending money = saving money
Sanders is sane

 

[Preacher]

Yawn.

 

[Preacher]

Republitards got no problem running a debt as long its saving money for the rich or paying for more wars.

 

[Vigilante]

Republitards got no problem running a debt as long its saving money for the rich or paying for more wars.

How much did Obuma ADD to our debt since inaugurated?

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

 

[Preacher]

Republitards got no problem running a debt as long its saving money for the rich or paying for more wars.

How much did Obuma ADD to our debt since inaugurated?

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

And? Bush took a surplus and turned it into a deficit from a DEMOCRAT president.

 

[Spinster]

http://insurance.about.com/od/DisInc/a/Social-Security-Insolvent-In-2017.html

The economic downturn and slow recovery have caused numerous individuals to file a claim for federal disability benefits through Social Security's disability program with applications for benefit claims.

The run of disability applications, the federal governmment admits, is pushing the financially strapped system toward the brink of insolvency.


The lengthy recession has had a serious impact on disability applicaions. Claims for disability benefits typically increase in a bad economy because many disabled people get laid off and can't find a new job. This year, about 3.3 million people are expected to apply for federal disability benefits. That's 700,000 more than in 2008 and 1 million more than a decade ago.

Individuals who qualify for Social Security disability automatically get Medicare after two years, even if they are younger than 65, the age when other retirees qualify for the government-run health insurance program.

Today, about 13.6 million people receive disability benefits through Social Security or Supplemental Security Income. Social Security is for people with substantial work histories, and monthly disability payments average $927. Supplemental Security Income does not require a work history but it has strict limits on income and assets. Monthly SSI payments average $500.

Disability benefits aren't something you can just jump onto if you get laid off. It requires having an extensive history of unsolvable medical issues. There are checks built into the system and can take several years before it is granted during which approval no money is distributed.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Republitards got no problem running a debt as long its saving money for the rich or paying for more wars.

How much did Obuma ADD to our debt since inaugurated?

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

And? Bush took a surplus and turned it into a deficit from a DEMOCRAT president.

He doubled the debt. And for nothing other than still blaming Bush. You do understand that right?