pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 72,109
- 28,041
- 2,210
Just as i expected from a violent racist black.
It's not a stretch to think the entire country hasn't seen a story from WV yet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just as i expected from a violent racist black.
When did I say that?You said that the police cannot detain somebody for 72 hours unless they committed a crime.
No shit.Well, fighting with the cops is committing a crime so yes, they can take you in custody or detainment.
Yes, but not necessarily by the person they are talking to. Still, that person has a duty to assist in the investigation, right?Yep when a law is broken they do.
Wrong. He DID have a duty to cooperate. Otherwise, police cannot do the job we ask of them.They found a guy walking home from the store. He didn't have to listen to any orders. They are facing prison time.
Yes, but not necessarily by the person they are talking to. Still, that person has a duty to assist in the investigation, right?
Wrong. He DID have a duty to cooperate. Otherwise, police cannot do the job we ask of them.
And he can then be detained until the police determine that there is a reasonable explanation for the guy to be walking around at midnight with a bat and a rope.He can check it out, but the person with the bat and rope doesn't have to answer any questions.
So, by not assisting, you appear suspicious of the crime?No, not necessarily. By assisting you might incriminate yourself.
He told them his name, what he was doing and pointed out his house he was going to. He doesn't even have to do that unless they can state a valid reason why they are asking and they could not.
So, by not assisting, you appear suspicious of the crime?
It's called the Terry law named after Terry vs Ohio. The court ruled that police can detain you for questioning if they believe you may have committed, or about to commit a crime. You don't have the right to dismiss yourself, they must dismiss you in order for you to leave. If you leave before officers tell you to continue what you were doing, they can arrest you for reasonable suspicion.
When did I say that?
In order to justify a detention, an officer must be able to articulate specific facts that lead to a reasonable suspicion that the suspect is involved in criminal activity.
Didn't apply here. In my example I posted with my son they were not finished "investigating" but I pointed out that they had no justification to investigate anything.
"Innocent until proven guilty" applies only AFTER you are charged, counselor.Innocent until proven guilty. Why people want to defend only some of our rights continue to escape me. Then you will get mad when people want to ignore the ones you support.
I may understand that there are negative consequences to our rights BUT they are always better than the alternative.
"Innocent until proven guilty" applies only AFTER you are charged, counselor.
Why do you defend criminals and criticize cops CONSTANTLY.
"Innocent until proven guilty" applies only AFTER you are charged, counselor.
Why do you defend criminals and criticize cops CONSTANTLY.
Only when it comes to prosecution. We're not even there yet. Suspicious until investigation leads elsewhere.Innocent until proven guilty.
Post it idiot.Just as i expected from a violent racist black.
Exactly what a lot of blacks do in the extreme. Nopp must be an ex jail house lawyer. We had some in the prison. They had clients but they didn't ever get them out of prison! Prolly kept them in!YOUR method is to cause MORE suspicion and turn their attention toward YOU, rather than lead them to the right person.