ok leftists I need you to clear something up

[candycorn]

Your refusal to see it is your own problem. But okay, coward, I'll hold your hand if that's what you want.

The New York Times Belatedly Admits the Emails on Hunter Biden's Abandoned Laptop Are Real and Newsworthy​

Yesterday The New York Times published a story that quotes emails from a laptop that Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden's son, abandoned at a computer repair shop in Delaware. The messages reinforce the impression that Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company that reportedly paid the younger Biden $50,000 a month to serve on its board, expected him to use his influence with his father for the company's benefit—an allegation that figured prominently in the scandal that led to Donald Trump's impeachment for pressuring the Ukrainian government to announce a Biden-Burisma corruption investigation. The messages include evidence that Hunter Biden arranged an April 2015 meeting between his father, then the vice president, and a Burisma executive.

If all that sounds familiar, it's because the New York Post first reported this eyebrow-raising information back in October 2020, a month before the presidential election. Pro-Biden, anti-Trump journalists, including several at the Times, portrayed the Post's story as unsubstantiated at best. Politico reported that "more than 50 former senior intelligence officials" believed the emails had "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation." Some journalists suggested it was reckless even to acknowledge the Post's report. Twitter, which initially blocked links to the article, seemed to agree. While the Times did not ignore the story, the paper's coverage treated it with skepticism and disdain.

But that was then. A year and a half later, the Times thinks the emails it viewed as suspect before Joe Biden's election are now newsworthy. "People familiar" with a federal investigation of Hunter Biden, it reports, "said prosecutors had examined emails" between him, his former business partner Devon Archer, "and others" regarding "Burisma and other foreign business activity." Those emails "were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop." The messages "were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation."

Still no quote from the Times...

So there is nothing to the "according to the New York Times" screed that Blart posted, right?

So please answer the question, is Blart a liar or just stupid?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Trump Dick Sucker can't back up his rhetoric? No surprise.

So you just admitted that you sucked trump's dick.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Still no quote from the Times...

So there is nothing to the "according to the New York Times" screed that Blart posted, right?

So please answer the question, is Blart a liar or just stupid?

Reading is fundamental

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Can you explain the leftist fascination with penises?

They want things they don't have.

 

[Lesh]

Your refusal to see it is your own problem. But okay, coward, I'll hold your hand if that's what you want.

The New York Times Belatedly Admits the Emails on Hunter Biden's Abandoned Laptop Are Real and Newsworthy​

Yesterday The New York Times published a story that quotes emails from a laptop that Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden's son, abandoned at a computer repair shop in Delaware. The messages reinforce the impression that Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company that reportedly paid the younger Biden $50,000 a month to serve on its board, expected him to use his influence with his father for the company's benefit—an allegation that figured prominently in the scandal that led to Donald Trump's impeachment for pressuring the Ukrainian government to announce a Biden-Burisma corruption investigation. The messages include evidence that Hunter Biden arranged an April 2015 meeting between his father, then the vice president, and a Burisma executive.

If all that sounds familiar, it's because the New York Post first reported this eyebrow-raising information back in October 2020, a month before the presidential election. Pro-Biden, anti-Trump journalists, including several at the Times, portrayed the Post's story as unsubstantiated at best. Politico reported that "more than 50 former senior intelligence officials" believed the emails had "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation." Some journalists suggested it was reckless even to acknowledge the Post's report. Twitter, which initially blocked links to the article, seemed to agree. While the Times did not ignore the story, the paper's coverage treated it with skepticism and disdain.

But that was then. A year and a half later, the Times thinks the emails it viewed as suspect before Joe Biden's election are now newsworthy. "People familiar" with a federal investigation of Hunter Biden, it reports, "said prosecutors had examined emails" between him, his former business partner Devon Archer, "and others" regarding "Burisma and other foreign business activity." Those emails "were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop." The messages "were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation."

People familiar with the investigation… Roody?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

People familiar with the investigation… Roody?

No the IRS and FBI isn't that amazing for a lap top that you leftists once call Russian disinformation having so much information in it. LoL

 

[candycorn]

Reading is fundamental

Irony can be pretty ironic.

 

[candycorn]

So you just admitted that you sucked trump's dick.

Nope...you (the one with TDS) can't read the Times because Trump's pubic hair is in your eyes.

 

[Lesh]

No the IRS and FBI

And you know this how?

That’s not what your quote says

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Nope...you (the one with TDS) can't read the Times because Trump's pubic hair is in your eyes.

Yes you did. I said you were TDS but you said it was Trump Dick Sucker

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And you know this how?

That’s not what your quote says

Since they are conducting the investigation they would be the closest to it.

 

[Lesh]

Since they are conducting the investigation they would be the closest to it.

They would be...but none have said anything that they put their names on.

it very well could be Roody you're referring to...or Bernie Kerik...or my cousin

 

[bigrebnc1775]

They would be...but none have said anything that they put their names on.

it very well could be Roody you're referring to...or Bernie Kerik...or my cousin

Since they are investigating they wouldn't put their name out there the case is to high profile.

 

[daveman]

Still no quote from the Times...

So there is nothing to the "according to the New York Times" screed that Blart posted, right?

So please answer the question, is Blart a liar or just stupid?

The quote was bolded, you chickenshit. You don't like it? Nobody gives a shit what you don't like.

 

[daveman]

People familiar with the investigation… Roody?

Read the whole thing. The author is quite critical of Rudy.

 

[Lesh]

Since they are investigating they wouldn't put their name out there the case is to high profile.

Which means you got nothing
"take on the NY Times take" isn't particularly damning

 

[candycorn]

The quote was bolded, you chickenshit. You don't like it? Nobody gives a shit what you don't like.

The quote wasn't from the Times....

So again...is Blart a liar or just stupid?

 

[jknowgood]

#1)
On February 21, 2020, The Washington Post reported that, according to unnamed US officials, Russia was interfering in the Democratic primary in an effort to support the nomination of Senator Bernie Sanders.

Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections​

#2) Is this a serious question? Trump was trying to destroy NATO, why would Putin invade anything when his puppet was doing his work for him?

Trump didn't try to destroy NATO, he was trying to get them to pay their fair share. I thought Democrats love that?

 

[jknowgood]

Didn't say the interference was successful....just like your Jan 6th Insurrection was a FAILURE.

Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Yes, the tax payers that paid for that building. Entered that day, what insurrection?

 

[Lesh]

Trump didn't try to destroy NATO, he was trying to get them to pay their fair share. I thought Democrats love that?

Trump Declines to Affirm NATO's Article 5

Speaking in front of the leaders of its member-nations, the president fails to make clear the United States still has the alliance’s back.

www.theatlantic.com

Article 5 is the basis of NATO