Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They want to make sure that one of you Biden drone heads don't go unhinged and kill the investigating team members or their families.Which means you got nothing
"take on the NY Times take" isn't particularly damning
Wow another new York timesTrump Discussed Pulling U.S. From NATO, Aides Say Amid New Concerns Over Russia (Published 2019)
The president’s repeatedly stated desire in private to withdraw from the alliance has raised concerns among officials who fear he may revisit the threat.www.nytimes.com
Hunter Biden lap coverup.
Trump Declines to Affirm NATO's Article 5
Speaking in front of the leaders of its member-nations, the president fails to make clear the United States still has the alliance’s back.www.theatlantic.com
Article 5 is the basis of NATO
Blart you fucking stupid bitch the new York times admitted to the coverup.The quote wasn't from the Times....
So again...is Blart a liar or just stupid?
The bolded part was from the times.The quote wasn't from the Times....
So again...is Blart a liar or just stupid?
'Fraud not. You lose.The bolded part was from the times.
You're dishonest. I'm done with you.
Wrong small brain.'Fraud not. You lose.
Pretending it doesn't exist doesn't actually erase it from reality.'Fraud not. You lose.
That no such quote from the Times exists erases it from realityPretending it doesn't exist doesn't actually erase it from reality.
But then, leftists live in a fantasy world.
Leftists are certifiably insane. Seek help.That no such quote from the Times exists erases it from reality
If Russia interfered with the 2016 election to help Trump and Trump was in the pocket and buddy of Putin.
Why didn't Russia interfere with the 2020 election?
and
why did Putin stop invading countries only to start back after Trump left the white house?
Not a very logic response. Try again.The cost didn't justify the upside, that's why.
Putin has been quite disappointed with Trump's impotence.
While Kremlin's past efforts may or may not have added up to getting Trump into office, the fact that these efforts became public knowledge also tied Trump's hands on being too overtly pro-Russian.
Not a very logic response.
Not logical. Try again.
#1)
On February 21, 2020, The Washington Post reported that, according to unnamed US officials, Russia was interfering in the Democratic primary in an effort to support the nomination of Senator Bernie Sanders.
Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections
#2) Is this a serious question? Trump was trying to destroy NATO, why would Putin invade anything when his puppet was doing his work for him?
What is there to try dummy?Not logical. Try again.
You feeble attempt to answer the question.What is there to try dummy?
You think your empty, unconstructive assertions need some sort of substantive response? They don't.
But hey, congrats on putting togather a sentence in English this time around.
You just can't help pissing yourself publicly, can you?You feeble attempt to answer the question.
you dumbass try again.
Answer the question or admit you believe in the hoax democrats tried to push.You just can't help pissing yourself publicly, can you?
Come back and complain about my argument when you can
1. Form a sentance.
2. Explain which part you don't understand or have a disagreement with.
