Okay, how was this not an Assault???

[reconmark]

Jury Acquits Officer Who Kicked Man in Head



Man is in the process of getting on the ground, gets kicked in the face breaking his jaw.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Even the black jury members said it wasnt assault.

 

[theHawk]

Because they're too busy trying to bust Corey Lewandowski for assault.

 

[reconmark]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

 

[reconmark]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

Some of them were actually listed in your article.
Did you read it or just look at the pictures?

 

[bucs90]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

Possibly having a gun. If I'm arresting someone who may have a gun....I'm not hugging them.

 

[bucs90]

And now the cop gets to file some lawsuits and get himself a nice payday. Probably enough to payoff his mortgage. Happy story!

 

[reconmark]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

Some of them were actually listed in your article.
Did you read it or just look at the pictures?

Are you hanging your intellectual hat on that empty peg...apparently "you"can't list just one.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

Some of them were actually listed in your article.
Did you read it or just look at the pictures?

Are you hanging your intellectual hat on that empty peg...apparently "you"can't list just one.

It's your article...read it.

 

[reconmark]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

Possibly having a gun. If I'm arresting someone who may have a gun....I'm not hugging them.

Both hands are on the ground and being weighted by the man's body when the man is kicked in the face...try something that makes more sense.

 

[reconmark]

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

Some of them were actually listed in your article.
Did you read it or just look at the pictures?

Are you hanging your intellectual hat on that empty peg...apparently "you"can't list just one.

It's your article...read it.

Not even one......

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

Possibly having a gun. If I'm arresting someone who may have a gun....I'm not hugging them.

Both hands are on the ground and being weighted by the man's body when the man is kicked in the face...try something that makes more sense.

Read your own article.
It brings that very issue up.

 

[reconmark]

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

Possibly having a gun. If I'm arresting someone who may have a gun....I'm not hugging them.

Both hands are on the ground and being weighted by the man's body when the man is kicked in the face...try something that makes more sense.

Read your own article.
It brings that very issue up.

Which is easily disproven when you watch the video, there is no such thing as a "sprinter's position "when one leg is already on the ground and the person is lowering themselves...

 

[Defiant1]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

He wasn't on the ground. How many times does he have to be told?

 

[Meathead]

Man is in the process of getting on the ground, gets kicked in the face breaking his jaw.

He dindu nuffin!

 

[Asclepias]

Jury Acquits Officer Who Kicked Man in Head



Man is in the process of getting on the ground, gets kicked in the face breaking his jaw.

More upstanding police helping the man to the ground. If they could beat the crap out of Rodney King and walk this isnt half as bad.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

Possibly having a gun. If I'm arresting someone who may have a gun....I'm not hugging them.

Both hands are on the ground and being weighted by the man's body when the man is kicked in the face...try something that makes more sense.

Read your own article.
It brings that very issue up.

Which is easily disproven when you watch the video, there is no such thing as a "sprinter's position "when one leg is already on the ground and the person is lowering themselves...

Dude you're a moron...
It's exactly the position this guy is in.

 

[Asclepias]

Even the black jury members said it wasn't assault.

It doesn't matter what the color of the jury members are.
How is this not an assault and what argument could be given to defend it???

We obviously dont have all the facts the jurors do.
On top of that the guy was reported to have a gun and he has a long history with the police.
He was a violent piece of shit and had he not been breaking the law in the first place he would not have a broken jaw.

I'm gonna chalk it up to a....
Play stupid games,win stupid prizes moment. Or Darwinism if you prefer.

What "facts" would have justified the officers actions???...please list just one.

He wasn't on the ground. How many times does he have to be told?

You answered a question with a question. A sure sign you cant find a reason.