Okeefe offered ballots 20 times in NC with no ID Oh there's no such thing as voter fraud riiiiight!

O'Keefe: I am John Doe
Pollster: Welcome Mr Doe, just sign here and you can vote
O'Keefe: Runs away

Democracy in action
Of course he didn't sign anything...if he signed he'd be breaking the law.

This stuff is simple...why play word games? you aren't fooling anyone.

Imagine that?

If you sign illegally, you are breaking the law and face prison. No wonder O'Keefe wouldn't sign illegally....as would anyone else

Why should it even get to the point of a signature? You just don't give a shit.

Weird how dumb right wingers are and the bullshit the fall for!
 
O'Keefe: I am John Doe
Pollster: Welcome Mr Doe, just sign here and you can vote
O'Keefe: Runs away

Democracy in action
Of course he didn't sign anything...if he signed he'd be breaking the law.

This stuff is simple...why play word games? you aren't fooling anyone.

Imagine that?

If you sign illegally, you are breaking the law and face prison. No wonder O'Keefe wouldn't sign illegally....as would anyone else

I see now..no one anywhere would ever violate any laws because they would face prison. Makes sense.
See if you can get the word out to every criminal in america...meantime you need an id to vote.
Simple.
Next problem?

A criminal will break the law when the reward greatly exceeds the potential punishment

In this case the punishment (years in prison) greatly exceed the expected reward (one extra vote out of 100,000+)
For a homeless bum, years in prison may be a greater reward than the few bucks slipped to him by a socialist manipulator in return for a fraudulent vote.
 
What lie? Your question was answered by proving that some don't either give a damn, or just think they won't get caught BECAUSE THEY DO IT!
I don't give a damn. What you don't want to admit to, is that the chances of discovery are probably slimmer than your fake percentsge. The number of votes in each example I gave are enough to have changed a number of elections at the state level. Even more at local levels. Sorry, I don't want even one candidate taking office that did not win it, by legitimate votes.
REALITY: Brennan Center: Even Crediting Dornan's Allegations To The Full Extent, The Overall Noncitizen Voting Rate Would Have Been 0.017%."


From the Brennan Center:

In California in 1996, 924 noncitizens allegedly voted in Orange and Los Angeles Counties, including 624 allegedly ineligible voters identified by the Task Force of the U.S. House of Representatives investigating the Dornan/Sanchez election. The allegations were based largely on attempts to match immigration lists to voter rolls, but only 71 voters matched name, date of birth, and signature; other matches were less reliable. Most of the identified voters were processed by one nonprofit group registering individuals proceeding through the naturalization process; many were registered immediately after passing an INS citizenship interview, and after receiving a letter indicating that they had become naturalized. At least 372 of the voters were apparently officially sworn in before Election Day. There are no reports of which we are aware that any noncitizens registered or voted knowing that they were ineligible. Even assuming there were no matching errors, and leaving aside the critical question of intent, if all 552 remaining individuals were in fact noncitizens when they cast their votes, the overall noncitizen voting rate would have been 0.017%.


http://brennan.3cdn.net/e20e4210db075b482b_wcm6ib0hl.pdf#page=5



So you go with a LIE over using your brain. Got it


WHY WOULD SOMEONE risk a felony to vote again????? lol

YOU LIE. Shocking you being a right winger and all

2831352270322.jpg

LMMFAO..look at the "source" in the bottom left corner.

too damned funny...what a clown!

So NO, besides AD HOMS you have NOTHING


Executive Summary
Ten states now have unprecedented restrictive voter ID laws. Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin all require citizens to produce specific types of government-issued photo identification before they can cast a vote that will count. Legal precedent requires these states to provide free photo ID to eligible voters who do not have one.

Unfortunately, these free IDs are not equally accessible to all voters. This report is the first comprehensive assessment of the difficulties that eligible voters face in obtaining free photo ID.

The 11 percent of eligible voters who lack the required photo ID must travel to a designated government office to obtain one. Yet many citizens will have trouble making this trip. In the 10 states with restrictive voter ID laws:

  • Nearly 500,000 eligible voters do not have access to a vehicle and live more than 10 miles from the nearest state ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. Many of them live in rural areas with dwindling public transportation options.
  • More than 10 million eligible voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest state ID-issuing office open more than two days a week.
  • 1.2 million eligible black voters and 500,000 eligible Hispanic voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. People of color are more likely to be disenfranchised by these laws since they are less likely to have photo ID than the general population.
  • Many ID-issuing offices maintain limited business hours. For example, the office in Sauk City, Wisconsin is open only on the fifth Wednesday of any month. But only four months in 2012 — February, May, August, and October — have five Wednesdays. In other states — Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and Texas — many part-time ID-issuing offices are in the rural regions with the highest concentrations of people of color and people in poverty.
More than 1 million eligible voters in these states fall below the federal poverty line and live more than 10 miles from their nearest ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. These voters may be particularly affected by the significant costs of the documentation required to obtain a photo ID. Birth certificates can cost between $8 and $25. Marriage licenses, required for married women whose birth certificates include a maiden name, can cost between $8 and $20. By comparison, the notorious poll tax — outlawed during the civil rights era — cost $10.64 in current dollars.

The result is plain: Voter ID laws will make it harder for hundreds of thousands of poor Americans to vote. They place a serious burden on a core constitutional right that should be universally available to every American citizen.


The Challenge of Obtaining Voter Identification Brennan Center for Justice
 
O'Keefe: I am John Doe
Pollster: Welcome Mr Doe, just sign here and you can vote
O'Keefe: Runs away

Democracy in action
Of course he didn't sign anything...if he signed he'd be breaking the law.

This stuff is simple...why play word games? you aren't fooling anyone.

Imagine that?

If you sign illegally, you are breaking the law and face prison. No wonder O'Keefe wouldn't sign illegally....as would anyone else

Why should it even get to the point of a signature? You just don't give a shit.

Weird how dumb right wingers are and the bullshit the fall for!

how do you know you're right when arguing with a hyperpartisan?
They call you names and try to change the subject.
 
being against voter id is gay

Its nothing but an established far left narrative.

Its like me having an excuse to go to work and not wipe my ass.:boobies::boobies::eusa_dance:

WHY would someone risk a FELONY to impersonate another? The ONLY fraud GOP voter suppression ID laws stop?



Bubble swelling is gay s0n.:2up:

So NO, you can't give a plausible reason for someone impersonating another at a poll, one vote at a time felony? lol
 
What lie? Your question was answered by proving that some don't either give a damn, or just think they won't get caught BECAUSE THEY DO IT!
I don't give a damn. What you don't want to admit to, is that the chances of discovery are probably slimmer than your fake percentsge. The number of votes in each example I gave are enough to have changed a number of elections at the state level. Even more at local levels. Sorry, I don't want even one candidate taking office that did not win it, by legitimate votes.



So you go with a LIE over using your brain. Got it


WHY WOULD SOMEONE risk a felony to vote again????? lol

YOU LIE. Shocking you being a right winger and all

2831352270322.jpg

LMMFAO..look at the "source" in the bottom left corner.

too damned funny...what a clown!

So NO, besides AD HOMS you have NOTHING


Executive Summary
Ten states now have unprecedented restrictive voter ID laws. Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin all require citizens to produce specific types of government-issued photo identification before they can cast a vote that will count. Legal precedent requires these states to provide free photo ID to eligible voters who do not have one.

Unfortunately, these free IDs are not equally accessible to all voters. This report is the first comprehensive assessment of the difficulties that eligible voters face in obtaining free photo ID.

The 11 percent of eligible voters who lack the required photo ID must travel to a designated government office to obtain one. Yet many citizens will have trouble making this trip. In the 10 states with restrictive voter ID laws:

  • Nearly 500,000 eligible voters do not have access to a vehicle and live more than 10 miles from the nearest state ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. Many of them live in rural areas with dwindling public transportation options.
  • More than 10 million eligible voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest state ID-issuing office open more than two days a week.
  • 1.2 million eligible black voters and 500,000 eligible Hispanic voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. People of color are more likely to be disenfranchised by these laws since they are less likely to have photo ID than the general population.
  • Many ID-issuing offices maintain limited business hours. For example, the office in Sauk City, Wisconsin is open only on the fifth Wednesday of any month. But only four months in 2012 — February, May, August, and October — have five Wednesdays. In other states — Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and Texas — many part-time ID-issuing offices are in the rural regions with the highest concentrations of people of color and people in poverty.
More than 1 million eligible voters in these states fall below the federal poverty line and live more than 10 miles from their nearest ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. These voters may be particularly affected by the significant costs of the documentation required to obtain a photo ID. Birth certificates can cost between $8 and $25. Marriage licenses, required for married women whose birth certificates include a maiden name, can cost between $8 and $20. By comparison, the notorious poll tax — outlawed during the civil rights era — cost $10.64 in current dollars.

The result is plain: Voter ID laws will make it harder for hundreds of thousands of poor Americans to vote. They place a serious burden on a core constitutional right that should be universally available to every American citizen.


The Challenge of Obtaining Voter Identification Brennan Center for Justice

Your "source" is the DNC, little hyperpartisan....LMAO...
too funny!
 
10 cases of voter impersonation at the poll in 14 years ...

gee ... a card should fix that.

yaaaaaaaaaaaaawn.
 
Oh that's right, you think people are too dumb to get themselves an id, even though they have to have them for any financial transaction in the US, period! I guess you must think there are millions that live off of bread and water alone, given them by someone else. You are a joke.
What lie? Your question was answered by proving that some don't either give a damn, or just think they won't get caught BECAUSE THEY DO IT!
I don't give a damn. What you don't want to admit to, is that the chances of discovery are probably slimmer than your fake percentsge. The number of votes in each example I gave are enough to have changed a number of elections at the state level. Even more at local levels. Sorry, I don't want even one candidate taking office that did not win it, by legitimate votes.



So you go with a LIE over using your brain. Got it


WHY WOULD SOMEONE risk a felony to vote again????? lol

YOU LIE. Shocking you being a right winger and all

2831352270322.jpg

LMMFAO..look at the "source" in the bottom left corner.

too damned funny...what a clown!

So NO, besides AD HOMS you have NOTHING


Executive Summary
Ten states now have unprecedented restrictive voter ID laws. Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin all require citizens to produce specific types of government-issued photo identification before they can cast a vote that will count. Legal precedent requires these states to provide free photo ID to eligible voters who do not have one.

Unfortunately, these free IDs are not equally accessible to all voters. This report is the first comprehensive assessment of the difficulties that eligible voters face in obtaining free photo ID.

The 11 percent of eligible voters who lack the required photo ID must travel to a designated government office to obtain one. Yet many citizens will have trouble making this trip. In the 10 states with restrictive voter ID laws:

  • Nearly 500,000 eligible voters do not have access to a vehicle and live more than 10 miles from the nearest state ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. Many of them live in rural areas with dwindling public transportation options.
  • More than 10 million eligible voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest state ID-issuing office open more than two days a week.
  • 1.2 million eligible black voters and 500,000 eligible Hispanic voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. People of color are more likely to be disenfranchised by these laws since they are less likely to have photo ID than the general population.
  • Many ID-issuing offices maintain limited business hours. For example, the office in Sauk City, Wisconsin is open only on the fifth Wednesday of any month. But only four months in 2012 — February, May, August, and October — have five Wednesdays. In other states — Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and Texas — many part-time ID-issuing offices are in the rural regions with the highest concentrations of people of color and people in poverty.
More than 1 million eligible voters in these states fall below the federal poverty line and live more than 10 miles from their nearest ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. These voters may be particularly affected by the significant costs of the documentation required to obtain a photo ID. Birth certificates can cost between $8 and $25. Marriage licenses, required for married women whose birth certificates include a maiden name, can cost between $8 and $20. By comparison, the notorious poll tax — outlawed during the civil rights era — cost $10.64 in current dollars.

The result is plain: Voter ID laws will make it harder for hundreds of thousands of poor Americans to vote. They place a serious burden on a core constitutional right that should be universally available to every American citizen.


The Challenge of Obtaining Voter Identification Brennan Center for Justice
 
The state of Texas will not accept state of Texas student ID cards.

Anyone want to argue that that is not purely partisan voter suppression?
They hand out texas student id cards to illegal immigrants, so no, voter id is not voter suppression.

The ID is to show who you are when you vote. Registration comes before that. Jesus wake up, Noddy.
 
sure...sure..anything you say...just don't type in capitals or bold anymore... :laugh2:


So NO, you CAN'T refute the FACT that the GOP voter suppression plan, voter ID does ANYTHING to stop fraud other than voter impersonation, AND WHY WOULD SOMEONE TRY TO STEAL AN ELECTION ONE VOTE AT A TIME? WHY RISK A FELONY? lol

settle down, son...relax..The DNC is undoubtedly proud of your partisan efforts here but relax...breathe...


So , NO you can't. Thanks for playing Bubba

New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations



It'll come s0n.......when hundreds of thousands are voting 3, 4 5 times nobody cares about the lame excuses lefties give for minorities not to be able to obtain id........a total ruse. Anybody who really believes that is a mental case.
I especially liked how the demorats got 100-105% voter turn out in some districts.
Repeat a lie often enough and Conservatives will believe it
 
10 cases? Where do you get your information? Because right now I can link you to more than that who have either double voted, or voted as an illegal or as the dead in the last 2 years. I guess you also think because drivers licenses don'-t fully stop people from driving without one, we should stop issuing them, too, right?
10 cases of voter impersonation at the poll in 14 years ...

gee ... a card should fix that.

yaaaaaaaaaaaaawn.
 

Forum List

Back
Top