Once Again a Person with a Gun Stopped a Mass Shooter

[RealDave]

Are you opposed to school assemblies, or are you just opposed to school assemblies dealing with gun violence?

State run protests against the US Constitution paid for the taxpayers should have every teacher involved in jail.

Why do you believe the March for Life is a "state run protest"? Or do you believe permissions for a protest or a school assembly reaches the threshold of "state run" protest?

You know I’m referring to the kids being used as pawns during school hours.

And I find it incredulous that you believe the kids don't have legitimate concerns born of their own experience. Does critical thinking and Life experience converge magically on one's eighteenth birthday? Were you just a dupe at 17 yet fully cogent at 18?

In 1973 I was a sophomore in high school, yet I was aware of Watergate. Hell! When I was five years old, I paid attention to the grown ups because they were worried the world was going to end in October of 1962!

You don't give kids enough credit for being aware of their own circumstances. And by not giving them credit, you find it easier to dismiss them to serve your own agenda. And that agenda is shutting down the first amendment only to support your interpretation of the second.

Unless it involves themselves or their cell phone kids don’t care.

And takes a total moron to think kindergarten kids organized a demonstration against the 2nd amendment.

So you think these ids are all in Kindergarten? Wow, you ared dumber than Trump.

 

[kaz]

A school shooting with the perfect body count. One. The gunman. Who is killed with an evil gun. Sorry Democrats. And even worse for you, this is going to deter future shooters.

Shooter dead, two injured after shooting at Great Mills High School in Maryland

Democrats of course want honest citizens disarmed because they are the biggest threat to your totalitarian leftist government dream. School shootings are gold. Dead kids to exploit as propaganda to disarm a nation.



There there, lefties. Keep a stiff upper lip

I see you are still s[pewing your lies & stupidity.

"Leftists" are not for disarming everyone.

Many are better armed & better trained than you.

You are right, leftists do not want to disarm everyone, they just want to disarm their victims......mass graves are harder to fill if you victims can shoot back.

They only want their authoritarian leftist government armed. Criminals are OK because they aren't organizing and are no threat to government

 

[RealDave]

No...we are really happy he didn't use a rental truck......

A rental truck would have been stupid to use in this case. An AR-15, designed for attacking people, would have been perfect. So thank goodness he didn't use one.

Your lack of knowledge about firearms is showing. The AR-15 rifle was not designed for "attacking people", nor is it an "assault rifle".

It is a defensive weapon and aside from using it for hunting or sport shooting, the majority of them are being used to defend people's lives, their families' lives, and their property..

You're confusing the benevolent AR-15 with true military assault rifles which are designed for attacking people. Those are full-auto or three-round burst, can fire up to 800 rounds per minute, have 200-round magazines, and sometimes have 40mm grenade launchers attached to them.

Does it really matter what the AR-15 was designed to do? The fact is it is an externally lethal weapon, 56 killed in Vegas, 17 in Parkland, 49 at the Orlando Nightclub shootings, all within minutes. The news media has made this firearm and it's emulators the weapon of choice for nuts that are planning on killing dozens of people, long before police can respond.

In defense of assault rifles, opponents point to the lives that were saved by these weapons which are few and far between. Do we really need weapons with this killing capacity to defend a home against a criminal? There are many firearms available that can do a fine job of protecting the home. It is incredibility rare for a home owner to have to defend his home against dozens of attackers and if that does happen, there is law enforcement, something most gun enthusiasts choose to ignore.

The worst mass shooter was Virginia Tech and he killed 32 with 2 pistols using 10 round magazines in one of the pistols.......Luby"s cafe, the shooter killed 26 with 2 pistols...

The AR-15 civilian rifle is no more dangerous than pistols in a mass shooting since the shooters choose democrat gun free zones to do the shooting.....

In each situation you named, the victims were unarmed......and in any of those except for Vegas, armed people would have stopped the shooter as we see all the time where armed civilians actually confront mass shooters...we know this because we have actual events where this has happened.

A rental truck driven by a muslim terrorist in Nice, France killed 86 people, more people than every mass shooting in this country...with a rental truck.....

Knives kill more people every single year than all of the mass shooters combined over 35 years.....795 people killed by mass shooters from 1982-2017 v. over 1,600 people murdered with knives every single year.


The AR-15 is the exact same rifle as every other semi auto rifle on the civilian market...there is no difference...which is why the anti gun leadership wants to ban them. If they can ban the AR-15, they can demand banning all the other semi auto rifles and pistols.....which is exactly what they screamed they wanted to do at the CNN downhill......

You have no right to tell anyone which Constitutionally protected rifle they get to use to protect their family...every rifle has features that make it suitable for home defense....the biggest thing for the AR-15 is it is easy for women to shoot....far easier than shotguns and other rifles.......

But you guys don't really care about dead victims....you only want to ban guns...

So pistols are as good as an SR-q5 so why would you care if they were banned? Please no target shooting bullshit.

 

[RealDave]

Almost every person with a gun who intends to murder a lot of people is stopped by someone with a gun. The Maryland school today is no exception.

If the armed law enforcement officers in Parkland had acted as they should have, a lot of lives would have been saved.

You can’t keep criminals from obtaining guns, but you can defend people from criminals.

Maryland High School Shooting Leaves 3 Students in Critical Condition, Including Suspect

I new this latest incident would fire up the NRA-fueled assholes.

Some points to ponder:

1) The Resource offer was a well trained law enforcement man with SWAT training & training in working with youth.
2) The shooter had a hand gun, not an assault type rifle. Not outgunning the officer.
3) The reason looks o be he got dumped by his girlfriend and not to kill everyone he could.
4) The shooter knew there was an armed guard & went in anyway trashing this "anti free gun zone" stupidity.

But if you are thinking on becoming a criminal, the NRA wants it to be really easy to purchase a deadly killing machine.

You forgot it was illegal for him to have a gun in the first place.

So your entire agenda is blown to hell.

Look dickfuck, the subject was your argument that everything is OK since criminals can't legally buy guns & you were too stupid to consider those who are not yet criminals.

 

[Marion Morrison]

School kids don’t have 1st amendment rights in school. And adults don’t at work.

But everyone has those rights on the streets of America. School kids and adults will peaceably assemble and exercise their constitutionality protected rights.

After school they do.

But the government forcing kids to march is another thing. State sanctioned protests against the Constitution shows how depraved the public school system is.

Are you opposed to school assemblies, or are you just opposed to school assemblies dealing with gun violence?

State run protests against the US Constitution paid for the taxpayers should have every teacher involved in jail.

Why do you believe the March for Life is a "state run protest"? Or do you believe permissions for a protest or a school assembly reaches the threshold of "state run" protest?

If they're using schoolbuses and taxpayer-bought fuel to get them there, you're damn right it's "State-sanctioned".

For those that oppose the whole thing, it's taxation without representation.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

But everyone has those rights on the streets of America. School kids and adults will peaceably assemble and exercise their constitutionality protected rights.

After school they do.

But the government forcing kids to march is another thing. State sanctioned protests against the Constitution shows how depraved the public school system is.

Are you opposed to school assemblies, or are you just opposed to school assemblies dealing with gun violence?

State run protests against the US Constitution paid for the taxpayers should have every teacher involved in jail.

Why do you believe the March for Life is a "state run protest"? Or do you believe permissions for a protest or a school assembly reaches the threshold of "state run" protest?

If they're using schoolbuses and taxpayer-bought fuel to get them there, you're damn right it's "State-sanctioned".

For those that oppose the whole thing, it's taxation without representation.

 

[Nosmo King]

But everyone has those rights on the streets of America. School kids and adults will peaceably assemble and exercise their constitutionality protected rights.

After school they do.

But the government forcing kids to march is another thing. State sanctioned protests against the Constitution shows how depraved the public school system is.

Are you opposed to school assemblies, or are you just opposed to school assemblies dealing with gun violence?

State run protests against the US Constitution paid for the taxpayers should have every teacher involved in jail.

Why do you believe the March for Life is a "state run protest"? Or do you believe permissions for a protest or a school assembly reaches the threshold of "state run" protest?

If they're using schoolbuses and taxpayer-bought fuel to get them there, you're damn right it's "State-sanctioned".

For those that oppose the whole thing, it's taxation without representation.

Imagine then how 97% of the American people feel as they watch congress and the president drag their heels over universal background checks. Our tax dollars pay their salaries, yet we get no representation from them that isn't approved by a lobbyist from the gun makers.

 

[skews13]

Almost every person with a gun who intends to murder a lot of people is stopped by someone with a gun. The Maryland school today is no exception.

If the armed law enforcement officers in Parkland had acted as they should have, a lot of lives would have been saved.

You can’t keep criminals from obtaining guns, but you can defend people from criminals.

Maryland High School Shooting Leaves 3 Students in Critical Condition, Including Suspect

"A person"?

You mean an exmilitary, highly trained SWAT officer that was stationed at that school as an RSO?

Yeah, just your average "person" that just happened to be in the neighborhood.

 

[Marion Morrison]

After school they do.

But the government forcing kids to march is another thing. State sanctioned protests against the Constitution shows how depraved the public school system is.

Are you opposed to school assemblies, or are you just opposed to school assemblies dealing with gun violence?

State run protests against the US Constitution paid for the taxpayers should have every teacher involved in jail.

Why do you believe the March for Life is a "state run protest"? Or do you believe permissions for a protest or a school assembly reaches the threshold of "state run" protest?

If they're using schoolbuses and taxpayer-bought fuel to get them there, you're damn right it's "State-sanctioned".

For those that oppose the whole thing, it's taxation without representation.

Imagine then how 97% of the American people feel as they watch congress and the president drag their heels over universal background checks. Our tax dollars pay their salaries, yet we get no representation from them that isn't approved by a lobbyist from the gun makers.

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms.

Adolf Hitler

 

[Nosmo King]

Are you opposed to school assemblies, or are you just opposed to school assemblies dealing with gun violence?

State run protests against the US Constitution paid for the taxpayers should have every teacher involved in jail.

Why do you believe the March for Life is a "state run protest"? Or do you believe permissions for a protest or a school assembly reaches the threshold of "state run" protest?

If they're using schoolbuses and taxpayer-bought fuel to get them there, you're damn right it's "State-sanctioned".

For those that oppose the whole thing, it's taxation without representation.

Imagine then how 97% of the American people feel as they watch congress and the president drag their heels over universal background checks. Our tax dollars pay their salaries, yet we get no representation from them that isn't approved by a lobbyist from the gun makers.

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms.

Adolf Hitler

Okay. When you use Hitler to bolster your argument, you really need to consider how strong your thinking skills are.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Here's another Godwiny quote, one that applies to this march that's coming up:

The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.

Adolf Hitler

 

[Marion Morrison]

State run protests against the US Constitution paid for the taxpayers should have every teacher involved in jail.

Why do you believe the March for Life is a "state run protest"? Or do you believe permissions for a protest or a school assembly reaches the threshold of "state run" protest?

If they're using schoolbuses and taxpayer-bought fuel to get them there, you're damn right it's "State-sanctioned".

For those that oppose the whole thing, it's taxation without representation.

Imagine then how 97% of the American people feel as they watch congress and the president drag their heels over universal background checks. Our tax dollars pay their salaries, yet we get no representation from them that isn't approved by a lobbyist from the gun makers.

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms.

Adolf Hitler

Okay. When you use Hitler to bolster your argument, you really need to consider how strong your thinking skills are.

Would you prefer Mao? Stalin? I know..Che Guevara and Castro, huh? It's all the same Modus Operandi: Get in power, disarm the people, kill anyone you want.

 

[kaz]

A school shooting with the perfect body count. One. The gunman. Who is killed with an evil gun. Sorry Democrats. And even worse for you, this is going to deter future shooters.

Shooter dead, two injured after shooting at Great Mills High School in Maryland

Democrats of course want honest citizens disarmed because they are the biggest threat to your totalitarian leftist government dream. School shootings are gold. Dead kids to exploit as propaganda to disarm a nation.



There there, lefties. Keep a stiff upper lip

I see you are still s[pewing your lies & stupidity.

"Leftists" are not for disarming everyone.

Many are better armed & better trained than you.

Kaz, like so many others shows signs of paranoia which is recognized as a symptom of mental disease. Should mentally diseased people be allowed to play with guns? Nope.

Another leftist who can't support your ideas with actual arguments. You're a dime a dozen

Feel free to point out which of my points was incorrect,.

Nothing like a fucking dumbass Trumpettte complaining about a post without support by making a post wuith no support. Right Sparky?

You were buried in the quote chain. That post wasn't written to you

 

[Weatherman2020]

State run protests against the US Constitution paid for the taxpayers should have every teacher involved in jail.

Why do you believe the March for Life is a "state run protest"? Or do you believe permissions for a protest or a school assembly reaches the threshold of "state run" protest?

If they're using schoolbuses and taxpayer-bought fuel to get them there, you're damn right it's "State-sanctioned".

For those that oppose the whole thing, it's taxation without representation.

Imagine then how 97% of the American people feel as they watch congress and the president drag their heels over universal background checks. Our tax dollars pay their salaries, yet we get no representation from them that isn't approved by a lobbyist from the gun makers.

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms.

Adolf Hitler

Okay. When you use Hitler to bolster your argument, you really need to consider how strong your thinking skills are.

Considering leading Democrats are literally giving hugs to Jew hating Farrakhan it is appropriate to bring what occurred in 1938 Germany into the discussion.

 

[Nosmo King]

Why do you believe the March for Life is a "state run protest"? Or do you believe permissions for a protest or a school assembly reaches the threshold of "state run" protest?

If they're using schoolbuses and taxpayer-bought fuel to get them there, you're damn right it's "State-sanctioned".

For those that oppose the whole thing, it's taxation without representation.

Imagine then how 97% of the American people feel as they watch congress and the president drag their heels over universal background checks. Our tax dollars pay their salaries, yet we get no representation from them that isn't approved by a lobbyist from the gun makers.

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms.

Adolf Hitler

Okay. When you use Hitler to bolster your argument, you really need to consider how strong your thinking skills are.

Would you prefer Mao? Stalin? I know..Che Guevara and Castro, huh? It's all the same Modus Operandi: Get in power, disarm the people, kill anyone you want.

And universal background checks will inevitably lead to the slaughter of the American people.

What color is the sky n your world?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

I didn't say anything about being pro-choice. I said abortion kills every baby it touches.

But since you brought it up, let me throw a little critical thinking at you. Being pro abortion means that you are specifically okay with killing babies. Whereas, being pro 2nd amendment merely means that you wish to keep the right to bear arms, not that you condone or are responsible for killings by firearms.

What is interesting is your choice of terminology.

Being pro choice kills no one. Being pro 2nd amendment kills no one. But abortion kills. And guns kill.

Critical thinking takes note of your choice of wording.

You're right: abortion kills and guns kill. So, take note of your wording in your original remark and explain to me why it's ironic that anti gun control people are against abortion.

They are also usually pro-death penalty as well.

You didn't say anything about the death penalty, pro or con, so how are we expected to make that connection? Shouldn't the original remark have read: "OH brother. Pro death penalty crowd giving lectures on abortion? The irony."?

Abortion and gun issues are really two very different issues. And here is how I view it. Both should be well regulated.

You say they're two very different issues (and they are) and yet you connected them anyway.

Becsuse you di in the post I responded to.

This whole back and forth between you and me started with this remark from you:

"OH brother. Anti gun control crowd giving lectures on abortion ? The irony "

It was the one I responded to and the beginning of our interchange. You are the one who somehow connected anti gun control and abortion and is the reason I responded to you in the first place.

 

[Marion Morrison]

If they're using schoolbuses and taxpayer-bought fuel to get them there, you're damn right it's "State-sanctioned".

For those that oppose the whole thing, it's taxation without representation.

Imagine then how 97% of the American people feel as they watch congress and the president drag their heels over universal background checks. Our tax dollars pay their salaries, yet we get no representation from them that isn't approved by a lobbyist from the gun makers.

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms.

Adolf Hitler

Okay. When you use Hitler to bolster your argument, you really need to consider how strong your thinking skills are.

Would you prefer Mao? Stalin? I know..Che Guevara and Castro, huh? It's all the same Modus Operandi: Get in power, disarm the people, kill anyone you want.

And universal background checks will inevitably lead to the slaughter of the American people.

What color is the sky n your world?

Blue without a cloud in sight!

America is not the Weimar Republic, in fact, we took and destroyed a lot of their guns, before the Weimar Republic had everybody register their guns, then took them a couple years later.

"Universal Background Check" is code for "Gun Registration". It's none of their damn business what people have. I would surely hope the history of the Weimar Republic won't repeat itself in America.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Why do you believe the March for Life is a "state run protest"? Or do you believe permissions for a protest or a school assembly reaches the threshold of "state run" protest?

If they're using schoolbuses and taxpayer-bought fuel to get them there, you're damn right it's "State-sanctioned".

For those that oppose the whole thing, it's taxation without representation.

Imagine then how 97% of the American people feel as they watch congress and the president drag their heels over universal background checks. Our tax dollars pay their salaries, yet we get no representation from them that isn't approved by a lobbyist from the gun makers.

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms.

Adolf Hitler

Okay. When you use Hitler to bolster your argument, you really need to consider how strong your thinking skills are.

Would you prefer Mao? Stalin? I know..Che Guevara and Castro, huh? It's all the same Modus Operandi: Get in power, disarm the people, kill anyone you want.

Russia, China, Cambodia, Germany all confiscated guns and shortly after millions were murdered by the government.

 

[Circe]

The school cop did fire a shot, and the shooter fired a shot also at that time. Note when you read the articles how very careful the wording is: they don't know if the kid suicided or whether the cop's shot killed him, not yet. The ballistics will take time.

In any case, if he suicided then, it was surely because he was under attack by the cop, so that did stop the school shooting.

How would you know that?

The articles make it very clear: the school cop fired right at him, and the kid also fired at just about the same time --- it's not clear which bullet hit the kid: he may have suicided, as they so often do, or the cop's bullet may have hit him. Ballistics will tell. This is not an uncommon situation, when they aren't sure immediately whose bullet killed the subject.

 

[2aguy]

Just imagine all those good guys with guns calmly patrolling the neighborhoods around endangered children. Such an American ideal. One wonders why the gun whiners here are so reluctant to take up the challenge. Would there beer get too warm being held for them? They talk about the enormous value of bearing arms, but we must assume that they mis-read it and only want to bare arms when it's warm.

Because....twit.....it is a felony to carry a gun onto school grounds.....that is a law you democrats created.