Once again, another active shooter.

[Fugazi]

Whether you like it or not, this is the cost of freedom.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Typical weekend in Democrat run inner cities but you don't cry about them. Wonder why? Because everyone involved is black perhaps?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Aurora, Illinois, shooting, at Henry Pratt Company building: what we know

Again...is that all we get?

There have been 39 mass shooting events already in 2019...but the GOP Senate won't even VOTE on Universal background checks

It was clear the gun control advocates owned the Republican Party, or did until Trump appeared, now Putin does.

 

[Rustic]

So, what is it you are proposing, Wry? 90 million weapons already exist and in the hands of the people. Why do propose as to what must be done???

I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.

Further confirmation of the fact that most conservatives are stupid and ignorant.

We see that stupidity manifest with the right’s slippery slope fallacy about ‘gun control’ leading to ‘confiscation’ – or some other such idiocy.

Indeed, the issue of gun crime and violence can be addressed absent additional firearm regulatory measures.

It's not a fallacy.....first they said they just want to ban magazines that hold 10 bullets...now they are calling for magazines that hold more than 5...that is a fact......now, the new play is to call for a ban on any semi-auto pistol that merely has the ability to accept a magazine that holds more than 10...knowing that a magazine can be made to hold any number of bullets they want.....so that means all semi-auto pistols can be banned...including shotguns and other tube guns because they want any tube magazine that holds more than 10....which means any shot gun or .22 rifle because they can hold short rounds that give them more than 10 round capacity...

So sell your baloney about there being no "slippery slope" to people who don't understand the issue...because there is a slope, and the anti-gunners will use it to ban antyhing they can.....

Yep, Any form of so-called “gun control” is all about confiscation in the end

The gun control act of 1968 did not lead to confiscation, in fact is was allowed to sunset by the Republican Party. Too many lives have been lost by that political machination, but that reality does not impact callous conservatives whose selfishness and greed no know limit.

Legal Personal firearm ownership has nothing to do with crime… your firearm confiscation would only hurt innocent people

 

[Wry Catcher]

Aurora, Illinois, shooting, at Henry Pratt Company building: what we know

Again...is that all we get?

There have been 39 mass shooting events already in 2019...but the GOP Senate won't even VOTE on Universal background checks

It was clear the gun control advocates owned the Republican Party, or did until Trump appeared, now Putin does.

POST SCRIPT: Putin's Russia has gun controls, wait 'till he gets together with trump for their next love in and he'll remind trump that his despotic rule is at risk with too many guns in circulation.

 

[2aguy]

So, what is it you are proposing, Wry? 90 million weapons already exist and in the hands of the people. Why do propose as to what must be done???

I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.

Further confirmation of the fact that most conservatives are stupid and ignorant.

We see that stupidity manifest with the right’s slippery slope fallacy about ‘gun control’ leading to ‘confiscation’ – or some other such idiocy.

Indeed, the issue of gun crime and violence can be addressed absent additional firearm regulatory measures.

It's not a fallacy.....first they said they just want to ban magazines that hold 10 bullets...now they are calling for magazines that hold more than 5...that is a fact......now, the new play is to call for a ban on any semi-auto pistol that merely has the ability to accept a magazine that holds more than 10...knowing that a magazine can be made to hold any number of bullets they want.....so that means all semi-auto pistols can be banned...including shotguns and other tube guns because they want any tube magazine that holds more than 10....which means any shot gun or .22 rifle because they can hold short rounds that give them more than 10 round capacity...

So sell your baloney about there being no "slippery slope" to people who don't understand the issue...because there is a slope, and the anti-gunners will use it to ban antyhing they can.....

Yep, Any form of so-called “gun control” is all about confiscation in the end

The gun control act of 1968 did not lead to confiscation, in fact is was allowed to sunset by the Republican Party. Too many lives have been lost by that political machination, but that reality does not impact callous conservatives whose selfishness and greed no know limit.

Like most gun control across the world, they pass the laws, then wait for the power.......right now, you doofus, the anti-gunners are moving to ban guns through the back door....magazine bans...where they are limiting magazine bullet counts to 5 or less.....which means every magazine and tube fed weapon will be illegal..since the anti-gunners have stepped up their efforts by calling for the banning of any gun that can simply accept a magazine that holds more bullets, not longer pretending to claim they will allow guns for law abiding people...

 

[2aguy]

So, what is it you are proposing, Wry? 90 million weapons already exist and in the hands of the people. Why do propose as to what must be done???

I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.

Further confirmation of the fact that most conservatives are stupid and ignorant.

We see that stupidity manifest with the right’s slippery slope fallacy about ‘gun control’ leading to ‘confiscation’ – or some other such idiocy.

Indeed, the issue of gun crime and violence can be addressed absent additional firearm regulatory measures.

It's not a fallacy.....first they said they just want to ban magazines that hold 10 bullets...now they are calling for magazines that hold more than 5...that is a fact......now, the new play is to call for a ban on any semi-auto pistol that merely has the ability to accept a magazine that holds more than 10...knowing that a magazine can be made to hold any number of bullets they want.....so that means all semi-auto pistols can be banned...including shotguns and other tube guns because they want any tube magazine that holds more than 10....which means any shot gun or .22 rifle because they can hold short rounds that give them more than 10 round capacity...

So sell your baloney about there being no "slippery slope" to people who don't understand the issue...because there is a slope, and the anti-gunners will use it to ban antyhing they can.....

Yep, Any form of so-called “gun control” is all about confiscation in the end

The gun control act of 1968 did not lead to confiscation, in fact is was allowed to sunset by the Republican Party. Too many lives have been lost by that political machination, but that reality does not impact callous conservatives whose selfishness and greed no know limit.

https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/SB501/Introduced

Prohibits possession of magazine with capacity to hold more than five rounds of ammunition. Provides that person in possession of such magazine must sell or otherwise dispose of magazine within 180 days of effective date of Act. Punishes unlawful possession of magazine capable of holding more than five rounds by maximum of 364 days’ imprisonment, $6,250 fine, or both

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A Gun Free Zone sign would have prevented this

 

[Wry Catcher]

I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.

Further confirmation of the fact that most conservatives are stupid and ignorant.

We see that stupidity manifest with the right’s slippery slope fallacy about ‘gun control’ leading to ‘confiscation’ – or some other such idiocy.

Indeed, the issue of gun crime and violence can be addressed absent additional firearm regulatory measures.

It's not a fallacy.....first they said they just want to ban magazines that hold 10 bullets...now they are calling for magazines that hold more than 5...that is a fact......now, the new play is to call for a ban on any semi-auto pistol that merely has the ability to accept a magazine that holds more than 10...knowing that a magazine can be made to hold any number of bullets they want.....so that means all semi-auto pistols can be banned...including shotguns and other tube guns because they want any tube magazine that holds more than 10....which means any shot gun or .22 rifle because they can hold short rounds that give them more than 10 round capacity...

So sell your baloney about there being no "slippery slope" to people who don't understand the issue...because there is a slope, and the anti-gunners will use it to ban antyhing they can.....

Yep, Any form of so-called “gun control” is all about confiscation in the end

The gun control act of 1968 did not lead to confiscation, in fact is was allowed to sunset by the Republican Party. Too many lives have been lost by that political machination, but that reality does not impact callous conservatives whose selfishness and greed no know limit.

Legal Personal firearm ownership has nothing to do with crime… your firearm confiscation would only hurt innocent people

You're wrong. A legal gun owner becomes a criminal when he or she commits a crime and uses his or her gun for murder.

 

[2aguy]

Further confirmation of the fact that most conservatives are stupid and ignorant.

We see that stupidity manifest with the right’s slippery slope fallacy about ‘gun control’ leading to ‘confiscation’ – or some other such idiocy.

Indeed, the issue of gun crime and violence can be addressed absent additional firearm regulatory measures.

It's not a fallacy.....first they said they just want to ban magazines that hold 10 bullets...now they are calling for magazines that hold more than 5...that is a fact......now, the new play is to call for a ban on any semi-auto pistol that merely has the ability to accept a magazine that holds more than 10...knowing that a magazine can be made to hold any number of bullets they want.....so that means all semi-auto pistols can be banned...including shotguns and other tube guns because they want any tube magazine that holds more than 10....which means any shot gun or .22 rifle because they can hold short rounds that give them more than 10 round capacity...

So sell your baloney about there being no "slippery slope" to people who don't understand the issue...because there is a slope, and the anti-gunners will use it to ban antyhing they can.....

Yep, Any form of so-called “gun control” is all about confiscation in the end

The gun control act of 1968 did not lead to confiscation, in fact is was allowed to sunset by the Republican Party. Too many lives have been lost by that political machination, but that reality does not impact callous conservatives whose selfishness and greed no know limit.

Legal Personal firearm ownership has nothing to do with crime… your firearm confiscation would only hurt innocent people

You're wrong. A legal gun owner becomes a criminal when he or she commits a crime and uses his or her gun for murder.

So, what is it you are proposing, Wry? 90 million weapons already exist and in the hands of the people. Why do propose as to what must be done???

I've proposed sensible gun control laws ad nausea; and the response, the only response - I get is "shall not be infringed", along with the usual push of the funny button and the more common ad hominem.

Further confirmation of the fact that most conservatives are stupid and ignorant.

We see that stupidity manifest with the right’s slippery slope fallacy about ‘gun control’ leading to ‘confiscation’ – or some other such idiocy.

Indeed, the issue of gun crime and violence can be addressed absent additional firearm regulatory measures.

It's not a fallacy.....first they said they just want to ban magazines that hold 10 bullets...now they are calling for magazines that hold more than 5...that is a fact......now, the new play is to call for a ban on any semi-auto pistol that merely has the ability to accept a magazine that holds more than 10...knowing that a magazine can be made to hold any number of bullets they want.....so that means all semi-auto pistols can be banned...including shotguns and other tube guns because they want any tube magazine that holds more than 10....which means any shot gun or .22 rifle because they can hold short rounds that give them more than 10 round capacity...

So sell your baloney about there being no "slippery slope" to people who don't understand the issue...because there is a slope, and the anti-gunners will use it to ban antyhing they can.....

Yep, Any form of so-called “gun control” is all about confiscation in the end

The gun control act of 1968 did not lead to confiscation, in fact is was allowed to sunset by the Republican Party. Too many lives have been lost by that political machination, but that reality does not impact callous conservatives whose selfishness and greed no know limit.

Yes...they are going to ban guns as soon as they have the political power to do it......



Illinois Would Face Semi-Auto Ban Under New Senate Bill - The Truth About Guns

What, specifically, does the bill ban? Any semi-auto pistol or rifle that can accept a magazine holding over 10 rounds. Thanks to 10+ roundaftermarket mags, that includes your Colt 1911-style handguns. It also includes your GLOCKS, Rugers, Smith & Wessons, and even your new, really nice SIG P365 concealed carry pistol.

The bill also has language mentioning features that make your tubular-fed semi-auto .22 rimfire rifles verboten as well. Thanks to .22 shorts.

Shotguns, you ask? SB-107 bans every semi-auto shotgun that can accept 5+ rounds. “Oh, but my shotgun only holds five rounds!” you say. Slow your roll, kemosabe. Thanks to the existence of shorty shells, your 5-round tubecan now holds about eight or so rounds. Banned! Class 3 felony – up to five years in prison! Merry Christmas!

Yes, this includes most semi-auto hunting and competition shotguns, too.

Hey, it’s not all bad news for existing gun owners. Yes, the bill allows current owners to register their guns with the Illinois State Police. For $25 each.

The bad news? I can just about guarantee Land O’ Lincoln Democrats will introduce a magazine ban this spring which will outlaw the magazines for your registered guns. No doubt gun-grabbing Illinois Dems will look at this coming magazine ban for registered guns as a feature, not a bug.

 

[depotoo]

What about all the illegals coming in and murdering people? Should we do universal backgrounds checks on them?

It's sure a shame that this shooting was done by those illegals you are ranting about, right?

This one was-
Illegal Alien Granted 'Temporary Protected Status' Murdered Man In Pennsylvania
And this one-
Illegal Alien Killed Man In Adjacent Hotel Room
And this one
Valerie Reyes' ex admits dumping her body in a suitcase but denies murder, police say | Daily Mail Online
Just since the 13th.

 

[Wry Catcher]

A Gun Free Zone sign would have prevented this

Another stupid meme posted by another member of the echo chamber. How shocking.

Why didn't you think before echoing such a foolish comment?

 

[depotoo]

A Gun Free Zone sign would have prevented this

They had one.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A Gun Free Zone sign would have prevented this

Another stupid meme posted by another member of the echo chamber. How shocking.

Why didn't you think before echoing such a foolish comment?

Arm yourself with a can of corn, moonbat. Lol

You left loons deserve to get airholed with your stupid laws and ideas

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A Gun Free Zone sign would have prevented this

They had one.
View attachment 246199

Well so much for that nonsense

 

[dblack]

What about all the illegals coming in and murdering people? Should we do universal backgrounds checks on them?

Build a police state! Heil!

 

[Lesh]

So the solution to work place gun violence...school gun violence...mall gun violence...concert gun violence...night club gun violence


Is nothing.

This can happen ANYWHERE...and does...often...and Republicans would do




NOTHING

 

[2aguy]

Aurora, Illinois, shooting, at Henry Pratt Company building: what we know

Again...is that all we get?

There have been 39 mass shooting events already in 2019...but the GOP Senate won't even VOTE on Universal background checks

there have not been 39 mass shootings moron.........there have been two...according to the anti-gun news source Mother Jones.....a left wing, rabidly anti-gun source that tracks actual mass public shootings....

US mass shootings, 1982-2019: Data from Mother Jones’ investigation

The shooter was a convicted felon who could not legally buy, own or carry the pistol he used......he broke the law before the murdered people....

Meanwhile, 1.1 million Americans use their guns each year to stop violent rape, robbery and murder...

 

[DJT for Life]

Aurora, Illinois, shooting, at Henry Pratt Company building: what we know

Again...is that all we get?

There have been 39 mass shooting events already in 2019...but the GOP Senate won't even VOTE on Universal background checks

I'll play.

Keep Guns out of the hands of Coons.

 

[2aguy]

So the solution to work place gun violence...school gun violence...mall gun violence...concert gun violence...night club gun violence


Is nothing.

This can happen ANYWHERE...and does...often...and Republicans would do




NOTHING

No, moron....you allow normal, law abiding people to carry their legal guns with them into gun free zones......which means that mass shooters will stop going and attacking these places. How do we know? Because the mass public shooters we have captured and the ones we have killed in their notes, state they chose their targets because they were gun free zones.......