OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning

[paperview]

Just for the record, who here currently is using this app? And I mean, specifically, before this thread was put up.

Here's some fun: You can vote as many times as you want.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The funniest thing about bribaby is that he's a self-described anarchist, but also a zealous Trump supporter.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Just for the record, who here currently is using this app? And I mean, specifically, before this thread was put up.

Here's some fun: You can vote as many times as you want.

Why am I not a bit surprised?

 

[Papageorgio]

Not very scientific, lots of room for error. Now if it was polling the other way left-wing whackadoodles would be for it and right-wing whackadoodles would be against it. That's how it works around here.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Skylar]

More proof that RWnuts need no evidence to accept the credibilty claims of something they like,

but on the other hand they put unlimited, unachievable demands for proof of credibility on something they don't like.

My favorite is when they do both. Like say......Trump's demand for transcripts he won't produce, or tax returns he won't release.

Trump isn't the GOP's problem. He's merely a symptom. These Trump sycophants that will believe *anything* they are told to think are the cancer eating away at the GOP from the inside.

 

[owebo]

Now all the Trumptards will rush out to get this app and drive up Trump's numbers on it even further.

lol, hilarious.

You keep sending your poll response by smoke signal....

 

[owebo]

More proof that RWnuts need no evidence to accept the credibilty claims of something they like,

but on the other hand they put unlimited, unachievable demands for proof of credibility on something they don't like.

My favorite is when they do both. Like say......Trump's demand for transcripts he won't produce, or tax returns he won't release.

Trump isn't the GOP's problem. He's merely a symptom. These Trump sycophants that will believe *anything* they are told to think are the cancer eating away at the GOP from the inside.

You democrats can get Trumps tax returns any time you want....

 

[bripat9643]

The funniest thing about bribaby is that he's a self-described anarchist, but also a zealous Trump supporter.

yeah, because Hillary is the logical choice for an anarchist to support.

You really are an incredible dumbass, aren't you, douche bag?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Not very scientific, lots of room for error. Now if it was polling the other way left-wing whackadoodles would be for it and right-wing whackadoodles would be against it. That's how it works around here.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The funniest thing about bribaby is that he's a self-described anarchist, but also a zealous Trump supporter.

yeah, because Hillary is the logical choice for an anarchist to support.

You really are an incredible dumbass, aren't you, douche bag?

Logically you would support the Libertarian, not the authoritarian bent on restricting more and more rights, increasing the deficit, and building an even larger military.

 

[bripat9643]

Not very scientific, lots of room for error. Now if it was polling the other way left-wing whackadoodles would be for it and right-wing whackadoodles would be against it. That's how it works around here.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The funniest thing about bribaby is that he's a self-described anarchist, but also a zealous Trump supporter.

yeah, because Hillary is the logical choice for an anarchist to support.

You really are an incredible dumbass, aren't you, douche bag?

Logically you would support the Libertarian, not the authoritarian bent on restricting more and more rights, increasing the deficit, and building an even larger military.

What "rights" is Trump proposing to restrict? Voting for the libertarian only helps Hillary get elected. Why aren't you voting for the communist party candidate?

Oh, that's right . . . . I forgot . . . . you are voting for the communist party candidate.

 

[Papageorgio]

Not very scientific, lots of room for error. Now if it was polling the other way left-wing whackadoodles would be for it and right-wing whackadoodles would be against it. That's how it works around here.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The funniest thing about bribaby is that he's a self-described anarchist, but also a zealous Trump supporter.

yeah, because Hillary is the logical choice for an anarchist to support.

You really are an incredible dumbass, aren't you, douche bag?

Logically you would support the Libertarian, not the authoritarian bent on restricting more and more rights, increasing the deficit, and building an even larger military.

Not sure what that has to do with what I said, but I see you didn't deny it.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

The official uniform of the 2016 Trump election observer has been approved by Donald Trump

Did you know the KKK was started by the Democrats? Learn your history.

That's true, until it was taken over by Republicans.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Wacky threads like this are going to be daily fare for the next nine weeks.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Not very scientific, lots of room for error. Now if it was polling the other way left-wing whackadoodles would be for it and right-wing whackadoodles would be against it. That's how it works around here.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The funniest thing about bribaby is that he's a self-described anarchist, but also a zealous Trump supporter.

yeah, because Hillary is the logical choice for an anarchist to support.

You really are an incredible dumbass, aren't you, douche bag?

Logically you would support the Libertarian, not the authoritarian bent on restricting more and more rights, increasing the deficit, and building an even larger military.

Not sure what that has to do with what I said, but I see you didn't deny it.

That was one of those aborted replies that the quirky board software puts up anyway in your next post.

 

[jon_berzerk]

The official uniform of the 2016 Trump election observer has been approved by Donald Trump

Did you know the KKK was started by the Democrats? Learn your history.

still are

 

[Juan de Fuca]

The official uniform of the 2016 Trump election observer has been approved by Donald Trump

Did you know the KKK was started by the Democrats? Learn your history.

still are

Well then why don't you put your proof of that out there so everyone can see it.

 

[BULLDOG]

and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments

One thing I know, no one at work dares to admit the support Trump, but I hear libs all the time talking about how much they hate him. You get the distinct feeling that your job would be at risk if you admitted to being a Trump supporter.

Probably be at risk if you started saying the world was flat too. Hard to keep an employee around if they just can't accept reality.

A hillary supporter accepts reality? That's rich. You're defending a pathological liar.

You're funny in a sad sort of way fingerboy.

 

[Flopper]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

First the primaries were rigged then the convention, was rigged, then the election is rigged and now polls are rigged. Poor Donald. He keeps seeing conspiracies everywhere he looks.

You do realize the primaries were rigged? It's been proven. That's why it's so easy to see that she'll cheat to win. It's a valid concern. It should concern all voters if they expect thier vote to matter. Half the Dems just blow it off because they are happy that Hilkary got the nomination. But she cheated to get it. Of this there is no doubt or question. It's been proven.

What proof??

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

 

[Papageorgio]

Not very scientific, lots of room for error. Now if it was polling the other way left-wing whackadoodles would be for it and right-wing whackadoodles would be against it. That's how it works around here.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The funniest thing about bribaby is that he's a self-described anarchist, but also a zealous Trump supporter.

yeah, because Hillary is the logical choice for an anarchist to support.

You really are an incredible dumbass, aren't you, douche bag?

Logically you would support the Libertarian, not the authoritarian bent on restricting more and more rights, increasing the deficit, and building an even larger military.

Not sure what that has to do with what I said, but I see you didn't deny it.

That was one of those aborted replies that the quirky board software puts up anyway in your next post.

Okay, I thought you went further off the deep end


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk