OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning

[NYcarbineer]

Not very scientific, lots of room for error. Now if it was polling the other way left-wing whackadoodles would be for it and right-wing whackadoodles would be against it. That's how it works around here.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The funniest thing about bribaby is that he's a self-described anarchist, but also a zealous Trump supporter.

yeah, because Hillary is the logical choice for an anarchist to support.

You really are an incredible dumbass, aren't you, douche bag?

Logically you would support the Libertarian, not the authoritarian bent on restricting more and more rights, increasing the deficit, and building an even larger military.

Not sure what that has to do with what I said, but I see you didn't deny it.

That was one of those aborted replies that the quirky board software puts up anyway in your next post.

Okay, I thought you went further off the deep end


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I'm comfortable at the deep end of the pool. You might not want to try it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

That 'poll' shows Trump up by 10 in California. Say no more.

 

[jillian]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

what are you blathering about?

 

[jillian]

That 'poll' shows Trump up by 10 in California. Say no more.

that's awesome.

 

[Arianrhod]

what are you blathering about?

He seems to be saying one of two things:

(1) Trump "fans" are ashamed of themselves for supporting him, so they can only vote in online polls if no one knows who they are
(2) The app probably allows "fans" to vote multiple times, thus skewing the outcomes

Or both.

Either way, our Little Dutchboy will be the most surprised of all on November 9th. He's probably already composing his "The Vote Was RIGGGGGGEDDDDD!" post.

 

[jillian]

what are you blathering about?

He seems to be saying one of two things:

(1) Trump "fans" are ashamed of themselves for supporting him, so they can only vote in online polls if no one knows who they are
(2) The app probably allows "fans" to vote multiple times, thus skewing the outcomes

Or both.

Either way, our Little Dutchboy will be the most surprised of all on November 9th. He's probably already composing his "The Vote Was RIGGGGGGEDDDDD!" post.

thank you for explaining. his "post" was barely cogent.

trumpsters are such whining little idiots......just like their psycho leader

 

[bripat9643]

and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments

One thing I know, no one at work dares to admit the support Trump, but I hear libs all the time talking about how much they hate him. You get the distinct feeling that your job would be at risk if you admitted to being a Trump supporter.

Probably be at risk if you started saying the world was flat too. Hard to keep an employee around if they just can't accept reality.

A hillary supporter accepts reality? That's rich. You're defending a pathological liar.

You're funny in a sad sort of way fingerboy.

The truth about the queen you worship hurts, don't it?

 

[bripat9643]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

what are you blathering about?

No one is surprised that you don't understand the OP.

 

[Flopper]

That 'poll' shows Trump up by 10 in California. Say no more.

that's awesome.

The RCP (Real Clear Poltitics) average of 5 polls has Hillary up 22 points in California.

 

[NYcarbineer]

That 'poll' shows Trump up by 10 in California. Say no more.

that's awesome.

The RCP (Real Clear Poltitics) average of 5 polls has Hillary up 22 points in California.

So the national polls are apparently off by 32 points in California, if the election were held today.

I wonder, what percent of the final state polls in presidential elections have ever in the history of polling got a state outcome wrong by 32 points?

 

[Old Rocks]

Unskewed polls.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

maybe Hillary is 1/32nd cat? she does sleep 16 hours a day.

 

[longknife]

I spend at least one hour every morning on Google+. I haven't counted but would estimate that negative Hillary posts outnumber negative posts by 100 to 1. And Trump positive posts outnumber hers by even more.

And these are NOT anonymous posters.

 

[jillian]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

what are you blathering about?

No one is surprised that you don't understand the OP.

Perhaps if it indicated rational thought processes.

Poor nutter

 

[Flopper]

That 'poll' shows Trump up by 10 in California. Say no more.

that's awesome.

The RCP (Real Clear Poltitics) average of 5 polls has Hillary up 22 points in California.

So the national polls are apparently off by 32 points in California, if the election were held today.

I wonder, what percent of the final state polls in presidential elections have ever in the history of polling got a state outcome wrong by 32 points?

I have no idea it there has every been a poll that wrong. State polls tend to be less reliable than national polls because sampling in state polls are usually smaller and less representative of the population. Also things change more rapidly at the state level. Clinton lead Sanders by double digits in Michigan, yet Sanders walked away with a two point victory.

I've read somewhere that when the national average of the top polls are a 6 point difference between the two candidates, the chance of the underdog winning the popular vote is very low.

One thing we do know is that if one candidate has a commanding lead in the polls, it has a negative effect on voter turnout.

 

[BULLDOG]

and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments

One thing I know, no one at work dares to admit the support Trump, but I hear libs all the time talking about how much they hate him. You get the distinct feeling that your job would be at risk if you admitted to being a Trump supporter.

Probably be at risk if you started saying the world was flat too. Hard to keep an employee around if they just can't accept reality.

A hillary supporter accepts reality? That's rich. You're defending a pathological liar.

You're funny in a sad sort of way fingerboy.

The truth about the queen you worship hurts, don't it?

The truth is great. Your silly accusations are pretty dumb though.

 

[tinydancer]

The bottom line is simple. When the D's polls over sample by double digits you are going to get an expected outcome.

Clinton leads.



But its all a lie.

 

[EriktheRed]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

Yup, you dipshits didn't learn a fuckin' thing from 2012.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The bottom line is simple. When the D's polls over sample by double digits you are going to get an expected outcome.

Clinton leads.



But its all a lie.

Clinton is winning moderates by 23 points, and that's a number that isn't skewed by sampling.