Oregon homes heated by BC aborted babies & amputated limbs

[tinydancer]

I want to bazooka barf. Bad enough to find out this is common practice in Britain, but now our guys think this is a swell idea too? They've banned this for the time being but where else is this going on?

Aborted fetuses from Canada were burned at waste facility to power Oregon homes

The British Columbia Health Ministry has admitted that fetal tissue, cancerous tissue and amputated limbs have been shipped to Oregon

A waste-to-energy plant in Marion converts the tissue to power for homes

Board of commissioners in Marion has now ordered the incinerator to stop accepting boxed medical waste to generate electricity

By Associated Press and Lydia Warren

Published: 07:05 GMT, 24 April 2014 | Updated: 17:01 GMT, 24 April 2014

]Fetuses aborted in Canada have been burned at an energy plant to provide power to Oregon homes, the British Columbia Health Ministry has admitted.

The biomedical waste shipped to the Covanta Marion plant in Brooks, Oregon also includes 'surgically removed cancerous tissue' and amputated limbs, officials revealed in an email.

The unsettling details emerged in email correspondence between a Vancouver-based newspaper, the B.C. Catholic, and officials from the British Columbia Health Ministry.

'The ministry understands that some [biomedical waste] is transferred to Oregon,' the email said. 'There it is incinerated in a waste-to-energy plant.'

Aborted fetuses from Canada burned at waste facility to power Oregon homes | Mail Online

Revelations: Medical waste shipped from Canada to the waste-to-energy Covanta Marion plant in Brooks, Oregon (pictured) includes fetal tissue, cancerous tissue and amputated limbs, it has emerged

 

[DigitalDrifter]

This has been all over the news here today. It's so disrespectful, I have no words.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Unsettling yes, but they chose the most potentially explosive detail for their headline. What is even more disturbing is the possible health hazard.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, heads are exploding but fact is, its all legal. Deal with it.

BUT, burning cancer? Where does that waste go? What are people breathing?

And, what is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's just not the same country, we're boiled frog

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

 

[Papageorgio]

Only one word... Disgusting.

 

[SillyWabbit]

Ummm, well, it's either the trash heap or the incinerator. What else is there?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Unsettling yes, but they chose the most potentially explosive detail for their headline. What is even more disturbing is the possible health hazard.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, heads are exploding but fact is, its all legal. Deal with it.

BUT, burning cancer? Where does that waste go? What are people breathing?

And, what is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

There it is right there folks, the voice of the left, the total disregard and callousness for the unborn.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

It's just not the same country, we're boiled frog

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

Agreed Frank.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Unsettling yes, but they chose the most potentially explosive detail for their headline. What is even more disturbing is the possible health hazard.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, heads are exploding but fact is, its all legal. Deal with it.

BUT, burning cancer? Where does that waste go? What are people breathing?

And, what is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

There it is right there folks, the voice of the left, the total disregard and callousness for the unborn.

Oh please. Get off your high horse.

What is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

 

[Vigilante]

Unsettling yes, but they chose the most potentially explosive detail for their headline. What is even more disturbing is the possible health hazard.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, heads are exploding but fact is, its all legal. Deal with it.

BUT, burning cancer? Where does that waste go? What are people breathing?

And, what is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

This is ONE INSANE BITCH!!!!

You BURY those poor HUMANS, just like you would bury your cat... or do you just burn it up in a garbage pail, you scum of the earth!

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Ummm, well, it's either the trash heap or the incinerator. What else is there?

Ummm, how about a proper burial, or cremation ? Something that shows at least a shred of respect. This isn't hard.

 

[Moonglow]

Here it is folks the voice of the right..

Old Mitt’s Investment in a Fetus-Disposal Company Is Not a Great Thing for New Mitt

That Bain Capital investment in Stericycle, a medical-waste company that helps to dispose of aborted fetuses? When Huffington Post reported on it earlier this year, Bain officials insisted that Mitt Romney, the currently pro-life Republican presidential candidate, had already left Bain when it happened, in 1999. But a trove of financial filings uncovered by Mother Jones appears to show the very opposite:

Another SEC document filed November 30, 1999, by Stericycle also names Romney as an individual who holds "voting and dispositive power" with respect to the stock owned by Bain.

Romney Invested in a Fetus-Disposal Company -- NYMag

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Unsettling yes, but they chose the most potentially explosive detail for their headline. What is even more disturbing is the possible health hazard.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, heads are exploding but fact is, its all legal. Deal with it.

BUT, burning cancer? Where does that waste go? What are people breathing?

And, what is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

There it is right there folks, the voice of the left, the total disregard and callousness for the unborn.

Oh please. Get off your high horse.

What is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

First of all you separate the so-called medical waste, from a fetus. You treat the fetus with respect, and you deal with the medical waste separately.

 

[Vigilante]

There it is right there folks, the voice of the left, the total disregard and callousness for the unborn.

Oh please. Get off your high horse.

What is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

First of all you separate the so-called medical waste, from a fetus. You treat the fetus with respect, and you deal with the medical waste separately.

She IS medical waste, shit for brains, and a BRICK for a heart!

 

[Vigilante]

I think we should all send her a note saying she ISN'T up to the current liberals standards... kill it before it breathes!

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Ummm, well, it's either the trash heap or the incinerator. What else is there?

Ummm, how about a proper burial, or cremation ? Something that shows at least a shred of respect. This isn't hard.

They are cremated, along with the other medical waste.

My guess is that some of you want funerals and coffins but who will pay for that? Not you. You won't adopt an unwanted baby so I know you won't pay for funerals.

I live in the real world.

What is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

There it is right there folks, the voice of the left, the total disregard and callousness for the unborn.

Oh please. Get off your high horse.

What is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

First of all you separate the so-called medical waste, from a fetus. You treat the fetus with respect, and you deal with the medical waste separately.

You paying for that?

How many kids have you adopted?

Or are you too busy shopping at Wal Mart and Hobby Lobby who supported 360 million abortions?

Hypocrites.

 

[Vigilante]

Ummm, well, it's either the trash heap or the incinerator. What else is there?

Ummm, how about a proper burial, or cremation ? Something that shows at least a shred of respect. This isn't hard.

They are cremated, along with the other medical waste.

My guess is that some of you want funerals and coffins but who will pay for that? Not you. You won't adopt an unwanted baby so I know you won't pay for funerals.

I live in the real world.

What is the safest way to dispose of medical waste?

That's a question pro-aborts endlessly badger pro-lifers with: “If you so badly want babies to be born, how many are you willing to adopt?” They hope that by casting pro-lifers as somehow not doing enough to give “unwanted” children a home, they can divert attention away from the deaths they’re responsible for, and guilt a few of us into shutting up. If that reminds you of a child snapping, “If you love it so much, why don’t you marry it?,” that’s because the challenge is about as sophisticated.

Sorry, but moral high ground doesn’t come that cheaply, the primary reason being that it doesn’t change the tiny details of a) who’s making children they don’t want in the first place, and b) who’s actually killing them and perpetuating that killing. Can anyone think of any other scenario where “I should be able to harm someone unless you aid me in some way” would be taken even remotely seriously as moral reasoning? If I forbid somebody from stealing my neighbor’s car, am I therefore obligated to let the would-be thief borrow my own?

Of course not. It’s preposterous. Again, pro-aborts are (intentionally) confusing the difference between abstaining from harm and going out of one’s way to do good. Our obligation to the former doesn’t necessarily entail the latter. And just because Person A won’t help Person B, it doesn’t give Person C a license to kill Person B. So even if this objection were to reveal that pro-lifers are somehow negligent in this area, it wouldn’t legitimize legal abortion.

It’s certainly true that all people, pro-lifers included, should do their part to find abandoned children homes, including adopting them themselves when they can. But, at the risk of ruining a perfectly good narrative by asking the obvious question, how do pro-aborts know we already aren’t? Do they have any reason other than malice to suggest that pro-life Americans aren’t adopting at a perfectly respectable rate compared to the rest of the population? Heck, how do we know pro-lifers aren’t adopting more than our “choice”-minded brethren? (After all, conservatives and religious Americans are more charitable in other ways.)

Personally, I’m not aware of adoption data to either effect, so if any of our critics can prove they’ve got facts behind the smears, step right up. It is, however, worth noting that even when pro-lifers do exactly what pro-aborts chastise us for allegedly not doing, it doesn’t make them hate us any less – just ask Rep. Michele Bachmann!

Besides, moving on from the macro to the individual level, it’s awfully presumptuous to assume whether the circumstances of a stranger’s personal life – yes, even a pro-lifer – are conducive to providing an orphaned child a good home, whether due to the number of children one already has (conservatives tend to have more kids than liberals), making too little to handle adoption’s steep price tag, being unmarried and therefore unable to provide a two-parent home, or simply because one isn’t good with kids.

Lastly, regardless of how many pro-lifers are personally adopting, the fact is that we’ve more than stepped up to support adoption – just take a look at Students for Life’s rundown of adoption activism and groups, and compare it to Planned Parenthood’s own abortion-to-adoption ratio (fun fact: the United States actually has more crisis pregnancy centers than Planned Parenthood clinics).

Another day, another shabby excuse for mass slaughter dispatched. It’s a sad commentary on our culture that there remain any venues where you can be taken seriously badgering someone to take care of a stranger’s child while cherishing the child’s own mother’s right to kill him or her.

 

[koshergrl]

"Waterman told KOIN that the facility had incinerated dead babies for years, in part because the Canadian government won’t dispose of fetal remains in this manner. That’s presumably why the BCHM sent the medical waste to Oregon in the first place.
KOIN says it will continue investigating this story. Good for them. Perhaps other news outlets in the US might want to start looking at their local waste-to-energy facilities, too, to see what trucks are dumping into the boilers and burners. "

Video: Oregon commission orders stop on using dead babies to generate power « Hot Air

 

[koshergrl]

Adoption and abortion are two completely different issues, and not in any way connected.

There are people lined up around the state waiting to adopt. It's a pathetic meme that the pathetic baby killers cling to, because they desperately want babies to be killed, and they will use any excuse to achieve it.