O's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013

Yes those on the far left that were calling for Bush to be impeached over such things are suddenly silent when Obama does it ten fold.

Yes the far left as they keep showing are nothing but huge hypocrites.

Did what ten fold?

Exactly the far left ignores Obama or anything a (D) does, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt what hypocrites they are.

Simple question.

Do you needed posted in another language?

Maybe this one?

Сделал то, что в десять раз?
 
Or maybe this one is strong with FOX.


فعلت ما عشرة أضعاف؟
 
3. Delay of Obamacare’s insurance requirements. The famous pledge that “if you like your plan, you can keep it” backfired when insurance companies started cancelling millions of plans that didn’t comply with Obamacare’s requirements. President Obama called a press conference last month to proclaim that people could continue buying non-complying plans in 2014—despite Obamacare’s explicit language to the contrary. He then refused to consider a House-passed bill that would’ve made this action legal.

Not a constitutional violation. Sorry.

From the ACA:

‘‘(e) EXEMPTIONS.—No penalty shall be imposed under subsection
(a) with respect to—
<snip>
HARDSHIPS.&#8212;Any applicable individual who for any
month is determined by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under section 1311(d)(4)(H) to have suffered a hardship
with respect to the capability to obtain coverage under a qualified
health plan.


It is this provision which Sebelius is exercising.


http://www.warner.senate.gov/public...ecord_id=1f5bcea7-7b11-41d9-87d1-1d07c8996947
 
Did what ten fold?

Exactly the far left ignores Obama or anything a (D) does, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt what hypocrites they are.

Simple question.

Do you needed posted in another language?

Maybe this one?

&#1057;&#1076;&#1077;&#1083;&#1072;&#1083; &#1090;&#1086;, &#1095;&#1090;&#1086; &#1074; &#1076;&#1077;&#1089;&#1103;&#1090;&#1100; &#1088;&#1072;&#1079;?

The post was in American English, but it obviously did not register in the far left programmed mindset that believes Obama has done no wrong.

So answering your question would be a moot point when you can't even acknowledge that Obama has violated the Constitution.
 
3. Delay of Obamacare’s insurance requirements. The famous pledge that “if you like your plan, you can keep it” backfired when insurance companies started cancelling millions of plans that didn’t comply with Obamacare’s requirements. President Obama called a press conference last month to proclaim that people could continue buying non-complying plans in 2014—despite Obamacare’s explicit language to the contrary. He then refused to consider a House-passed bill that would’ve made this action legal.

Not a constitutional violation. Sorry.

From the ACA:

‘‘(e) EXEMPTIONS.—No penalty shall be imposed under subsection
(a) with respect to—
<snip>
HARDSHIPS.—Any applicable individual who for any
month is determined by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under section 1311(d)(4)(H) to have suffered a hardship
with respect to the capability to obtain coverage under a qualified
health plan.


It is this provision which Sebelius is exercising.


Press Releases - Newsroom - Mark R. Warner

WOW quoting a far left senator as your "facts".

Amazing, it seems that the far left does not understand the bill they had to pass to find out what is in it.
 
6. Political profiling by the IRS. After seeing a rise in the number of applications for tax-exempt status, the IRS in 2010 compiled a &#8220;be on the lookout&#8221; (&#8220;BOLO&#8221;) list to identify organizations engaged in political activities. The list included words such as &#8220;Tea Party,&#8221; &#8220;Patriots,&#8221; and &#8220;Israel&#8221;; subjects such as government spending, debt, or taxes; and activities such as criticizing the government, educating about the Constitution, or challenging Obamacare. The targeting continued through May of this year.

This is a lie of omission.

Here is one of those BOLO lists: http://democrats.waysandmeans.house...ber 2010 BOLO IRS0000001349-IRS0000001364.pdf

Notice it also targets progressive groups. See line 16 on page 6.

nmahip.jpg
 
There is also a pro-ObamaCare group on the BOLO list:

3022az9.jpg
 
3. Delay of Obamacare&#8217;s insurance requirements. The famous pledge that &#8220;if you like your plan, you can keep it&#8221; backfired when insurance companies started cancelling millions of plans that didn&#8217;t comply with Obamacare&#8217;s requirements. President Obama called a press conference last month to proclaim that people could continue buying non-complying plans in 2014&#8212;despite Obamacare&#8217;s explicit language to the contrary. He then refused to consider a House-passed bill that would&#8217;ve made this action legal.

Not a constitutional violation. Sorry.

From the ACA:

&#8216;&#8216;(e) EXEMPTIONS.&#8212;No penalty shall be imposed under subsection
(a) with respect to&#8212;
<snip>
HARDSHIPS.&#8212;Any applicable individual who for any
month is determined by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under section 1311(d)(4)(H) to have suffered a hardship
with respect to the capability to obtain coverage under a qualified
health plan.


It is this provision which Sebelius is exercising.


Press Releases - Newsroom - Mark R. Warner

WOW quoting a far left senator as your "facts".

Amazing, it seems that the far left does not understand the bill they had to pass to find out what is in it.

Hey, dipshit. I quoted the ACA, not the Senator. Looks like you are the one who does not know what is in it. Oopsie! :lol:

I provided the link to letters exchanged between Sebelius and some Democrats to show Sebelius is using the "hardship exemption" in the ACA as her justification.


Seriously, you should stick to your robotic one-liners. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Not a constitutional violation. Sorry.

From the ACA:




It is this provision which Sebelius is exercising.


Press Releases - Newsroom - Mark R. Warner

WOW quoting a far left senator as your "facts".

Amazing, it seems that the far left does not understand the bill they had to pass to find out what is in it.

Hey, dipshit. I quoted the ACA, not the Senator.

Seriously, you should stick to your robotic one-liners. :lol:

I pointed out the far left (you) does not understand what you posted especially taking it from a far left source.

Then again you don't understand much other than trolling.
 
3. Delay of Obamacare’s insurance requirements. The famous pledge that “if you like your plan, you can keep it” backfired when insurance companies started cancelling millions of plans that didn’t comply with Obamacare’s requirements. President Obama called a press conference last month to proclaim that people could continue buying non-complying plans in 2014—despite Obamacare’s explicit language to the contrary. He then refused to consider a House-passed bill that would’ve made this action legal.

Not a constitutional violation. Sorry.

From the ACA:

‘‘(e) EXEMPTIONS.—No penalty shall be imposed under subsection
(a) with respect to—
<snip>
HARDSHIPS.—Any applicable individual who for any
month is determined by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under section 1311(d)(4)(H) to have suffered a hardship
with respect to the capability to obtain coverage under a qualified
health plan.


It is this provision which Sebelius is exercising.


Press Releases - Newsroom - Mark R. Warner

So the ACA itself constitues a hardship? Yeah, what we've been saying all along.
 
Not a constitutional violation. Sorry.

From the ACA:




It is this provision which Sebelius is exercising.


Press Releases - Newsroom - Mark R. Warner

WOW quoting a far left senator as your "facts".

Amazing, it seems that the far left does not understand the bill they had to pass to find out what is in it.

Hey, dipshit. I quoted the ACA, not the Senator. Looks like you are the one who does not know what is in it.

I provided the letters exchanged between Sebelius and some Democrats to show Sebelius is using the "hardship exemption" in the ACA as her justification.


Seriously, you should stick to your robotic one-liners. :lol:

Gotta give it to Al-Kosh.

His English isn't that bad.

I couldn't make heads or tails of his native language.
 
So the ACA itself constitues a hardship? Yeah, what we've been saying all along.

You will get no argument from me about the ACA being a total clusterfuck. It's a fact, and I am all about facts.
 
Kosh does sound more Arabic than Russian.

And the far left can not see anything past their programming.

More proof what drones they are.

Saw where are you from? Al-Kosh?

Yemen or Saudi Arabia?

In either case watch out for Drones..

Could be fatal.

And the far left Obama drones continue on with their personal attacks as they have no fact s to back up their belief in their messiah Obama.
 
WOW quoting a far left senator as your "facts".

Amazing, it seems that the far left does not understand the bill they had to pass to find out what is in it.

Hey, dipshit. I quoted the ACA, not the Senator. Looks like you are the one who does not know what is in it.

I provided the letters exchanged between Sebelius and some Democrats to show Sebelius is using the "hardship exemption" in the ACA as her justification.


Seriously, you should stick to your robotic one-liners. :lol:

Gotta give it to Al-Kosh.

His English isn't that bad.

I couldn't make heads or tails of his native language.

And still no sense of individuality from the far left Obama drones.

And still has not posted on fact to support their belief n their messiah Obama.
 
And the far left can not see anything past their programming.

More proof what drones they are.

Saw where are you from? Al-Kosh?

Yemen or Saudi Arabia?

In either case watch out for Drones..

Could be fatal.

And the far left Obama drones continue on with their personal attacks as they have no fact s to back up their belief in their messiah Obama.

What personal attack?

You should be proud of your Arabic heritage.
 
3. Delay of Obamacare’s insurance requirements. The famous pledge that “if you like your plan, you can keep it” backfired when insurance companies started cancelling millions of plans that didn’t comply with Obamacare’s requirements. President Obama called a press conference last month to proclaim that people could continue buying non-complying plans in 2014—despite Obamacare’s explicit language to the contrary. He then refused to consider a House-passed bill that would’ve made this action legal.

Not a constitutional violation. Sorry.

From the ACA:

‘‘(e) EXEMPTIONS.—No penalty shall be imposed under subsection
(a) with respect to—
<snip>
HARDSHIPS.—Any applicable individual who for any
month is determined by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under section 1311(d)(4)(H) to have suffered a hardship
with respect to the capability to obtain coverage under a qualified
health plan.


It is this provision which Sebelius is exercising.


Press Releases - Newsroom - Mark R. Warner

So the ACA itself constitues a hardship? Yeah, what we've been saying all along.

Yes it is, but the far left Obama drone did not understand what they posted.
 

Forum List

Back
Top