Zander
Platinum Member
It's the pacific oceans fault!! It's eating the warming!! It's a denier!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In the order you asked....
States of Missouri, Illinois and Arkansas, Oklahoma and Kentucky. Very similar climates Because I'm not 74 yet. Yes. Yeah...first hand information, such as the summer of 1954 when the mid-July temperature hit a forever high of 116 degrees and averaged over 100 degrees for about a week and a half. I was 12 years old and practically no one had air conditioning. My dad went out and purchased the first window fan we ever owned. Many people were sleeping in Forest Park at night...St. Louis' answer to N.Y. City's Central Park. My recollection pretty much coincides with any data on file.
How could I argue with that?
Well... perhaps like this:
![]()
Do you think your personal recollections are accurate to 0.6C over 73 years? That would require that you discern roughly 15 thousandths of a farenheit degree of average, annual warming every year.
Pardon me if I don't think you're up to it.
In the order you asked....
States of Missouri, Illinois and Arkansas, Oklahoma and Kentucky. Very similar climates Because I'm not 74 yet. Yes. Yeah...first hand information, such as the summer of 1954 when the mid-July temperature hit a forever high of 116 degrees and averaged over 100 degrees for about a week and a half. I was 12 years old and practically no one had air conditioning. My dad went out and purchased the first window fan we ever owned. Many people were sleeping in Forest Park at night...St. Louis' answer to N.Y. City's Central Park. My recollection pretty much coincides with any data on file.
How could I argue with that?
Well... perhaps like this:
![]()
Do you think your personal recollections are accurate to 0.6C over 73 years? That would require that you discern roughly 15 thousandths of a farenheit degree of average, annual warming every year.
Pardon me if I don't think you're up to it.
I don't need to be "up to it". I know what I have lived through. I mentioned the 116 degree day in 1954. Seems I was wrong this article say it only got up to 115 at the airport.
A look back On July 14 1954 residents fought a battle to survive the hottest day in recorded history here News
Then there was the largest snow EVER in St. Louis...beginning Jan. 31, 1982 and continuing off and on for 3 or 4 more days into February causing me and the wife and my two boys to hand shovel 25 inches off my gravel tenth of a mile long driveway because I refused to pay the snow plow guy $250 who didn't make after the first 15 inches on Sunday, the 31st.
Snow of 1982 buried much of metro area for days News
Those two events stick out.
But, but, but,but. what about the "scientific" consensus?
![]()
It's the pacific oceans fault!! It's eating the warming!! It's a denier!!!
Hot outside? It's Global Warming!
Cold Outside? It's Global Warming!
Unchanged outside? IT'S GLOBAL WARMING!!!!!
And my science covers 73 years of actually going outside into the "CLIMATE" and finding some "perfect" years, some "not so perfect" (too hot or too cold or too much rain or too much snow or not enough rain or snow), some years being too cold during the summer, some years being too hot during the summer, some years with practically no incredibly cold winter weather, some years with no brilliant fall colors and some with brilliant falls colors.
AND IT ALL AVERAGES OUT TO NORMAL GLOBAL TEMPERATURES IN MY PART OF THE WORLD OVER THOSE 73 FREAKING YEARS.
But, but, but,but. what about the "scientific" consensus?
![]()
Oops.
Climate contrarians accidentally confirm the 97 global warming consensus Dana Nuccitelli Environment The Guardian
Why do you all act as if you just heard this idea? That changes in air movements were causing warmed water to be subducted has been the most widely accepted of causes for the hiatus for over a decade.
Total Bullshit.Why do you all act as if you just heard this idea? That changes in air movements were causing warmed water to be subducted has been the most widely accepted of causes for the hiatus for over a decade.
A hiatus ?
What happened to the "eight of the hottest years in the past decade" claims ?
Seriously, I am confused.
And my science covers 73 years of actually going outside into the "CLIMATE" and finding some "perfect" years, some "not so perfect" (too hot or too cold or too much rain or too much snow or not enough rain or snow), some years being too cold during the summer, some years being too hot during the summer, some years with practically no incredibly cold winter weather, some years with no brilliant fall colors and some with brilliant falls colors.
AND IT ALL AVERAGES OUT TO NORMAL GLOBAL TEMPERATURES IN MY PART OF THE WORLD OVER THOSE 73 FREAKING YEARS.
Your part of the world <> the world.
You cannot even get that basic point right. Another one for my ignore list.
Skook was one of our agents once. We sent him to infiltrate a denier cult ritual. You can see the results. We've stopped sending people, not wanting to lose any more of them to whatever unspeakable perversions the deniers use to lure in new cultists.
Do we have some guesses? Yes. The prevailing theory is that the denier cult initiation ritual involves both castration and a lobotomy, along with heavy substance abuse. Rumors, however, speak of some darker ritual involving the worship of some extradimensional shambling thing.
But, but, but,but. what about the "scientific" consensus?
![]()
Oops.
Climate contrarians accidentally confirm the 97 global warming consensus Dana Nuccitelli Environment The Guardian
He makes the claim that it was confirmed.
The article itself is somewhat circular and sheds no additional light on anything.
But, but, but,but. what about the "scientific" consensus?
![]()
Oops.
Climate contrarians accidentally confirm the 97 global warming consensus Dana Nuccitelli Environment The Guardian
He makes the claim that it was confirmed.
The article itself is somewhat circular and sheds no additional light on anything.
It shows that even skeptics acknowledge that there is a consensus.