jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,189
- 29,136
- 2,180
did he pull a gun? I didn't see that. He was a hired security guard.And her little friend too.It wouldn't have been if she had listened to the teacher. She would have gotten detention or something. But because she refused to leave, then she committed a crime by resisting the lawful order of a police officer, resisting arrest, and assaulting that police officer. I hope she gets stuck with all those charges.That's absurd........why should a cop be required to call for back-up in order to arrest 1 belligerent teenage girl? .......![]()
Why should the girl be arrested? Since when is bad behavior at school a crime?
Police should not be used to address bad behavior at school.
Based on eyewitness accounts, the teacher had asked her to do to the discipline office. She refused. The police officer asked. She refused.
Under Title 16, Chapter 17, Article 7, Section 420 of the SC Code of Laws, it is unlawful: "(1) for any person willfully or unnecessarily (a) to interfere with or to disturb in any way or in any place the students or teachers of any school or college in the State, (b) to loiter around such schools or college premises, or (c) to act in an obnoxious manner thereon . . ."
When she refused to leave upon the teacher's request to go to the discipline office, she met part a. When she refused the request by the police officer, she met part c.
To the moron that asked why she should be arrested, since when is bad behavior at school a crime, and stated that police shouldn't be used to address it, there's the law answer the two questions. Since police handle violations of laws, that addresses the statement.
I agree it was a legal arrest. I just disagree with the law. It's absurd our society is to the point that men with guns have to come into science class to discipline brat kids because parents and teachers don't want to.