Over half of likely voters say the 2020 election was stolen

That means as much as....


3 people in France did what? Non noticed or cared....hundreds/thousands of Americans screaming FUCK BIDEN on sporting event televised all across america is a different story hun.
 
No, it did not.

50+​


Courts Blocked An Evidentiary Hearing

You are pushing a conspiracy theory now. The worm has turned.
LOL

The only worm you ever see is the one at the bottom of the bottle after you polish off the Tequila.
 
1) What was the specific evidence presented by Trump lawyers in court that was proven false?
What specific evidence do you allege the Trumpylawyers actually submitted in court?

“This is not a fraud case,” Langhofer said, casting the lawsuit instead as allegations of flaws within the voting system. “It is not a stealing-the-election case.”

That marked the second time in as many days that attorneys for the Trump campaign disavowed in court what the president and his loyalists alleged in print, tweets and on the public airwaves.

 
They found NONE of those things. Trump judges rejected that bullshit. Did they find fraudulent votes? Yes, one here/ two there. Nothing in quantities that would have affected any outcome.

I don’t know where you get your information, but it’s BS. Find better sources. Nobody wants to go to prison for a felony just to get an extra vote in. That’d be stoopid. :rolleyes-41:
No love they found thousands of ghost votes and thousands of "lost" votes...
 
Anyone who says election fraud doesn't exist is just a complete idiot.

Now, I don't know if there was enough fraud to get Biden elected. But the fact is that we should strive for NO FRAUD AT ALL.

The left strives to make fraud easier, not harder. Theres a reason for that!!!

Go ahead and strive for it.

But regardless of how good our system is, half the country is going to whine like a bunch of crybabies.
 
Do you think your whining hissy-fit means jack shit?

Go wipe your tears, snowflake.
Cheers!


0e8c19d430cdc2c5c19f3e04a5340a96.jpg
 
No love they found thousands of ghost votes and thousands of "lost" votes...

Says some RW blogger who thinks bullying gays is “healthy peer pressure”? LoL!

 
No they didn’t, nutbag. I just posted one such case where they went into court to prove instances of illegal voters, dead voters, etc... and were thrown out of court for utterly failing to present any evidence demonstrating their claims. Then they were thrown out of court a second time by six more judges when they appealed the lower court's findings for the same reason.

You idiots just don't seem to understand the bullshit you post here doesn't fly in a courtroom.
You are pushing a conspiracy theory. Everyone knows the election was stolen and the courts refused to hear evidence.
 
You are pushing a conspiracy theory. Everyone knows the election was stolen and the courts refused to hear evidence.
You're fucked in the head, FruitLoops. I literally quoted two courts ruling they were throwing the case out due to lack of evidence.

You really are crazy enough to call an actual court case, a "conspiracy"... while at the same time, call the conspiracy you've failed to prove for nearly a year, "reality."

d445b99984c06f24e63036ac81e7501a.gif
 
No, it did not.

50+​


Courts Blocked An Evidentiary Hearing

You are pushing a conspiracy theory now. The worm has turned.
Yes. It did. The worm has been squashed. :)
 
You're fucked in the head, FruitLoops. I literally quoted two courts ruling they were throwing the case out due to lack of evidence.

You really are crazy enough to call an actual court case, a "conspiracy"... while at the same time, call the conspiracy you've failed to prove for nearly a year, "reality."

d445b99984c06f24e63036ac81e7501a.gif
How can they say there is a lack of evidence until the hear it? They can't. Cases were refused for other bogus reasons.

Please stop pushing your conspiracy theory that the election was stolen you are threatening our democracy. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
No it hasn't. Anything they find in the audits can be taken to court. You are pushing the conspiracy theory now. The election was stolen.

What has the GOP done that is fascist? This should be good. The fascists are the ones in power. Not a good day for you.
Hahaha the last thing your fascist masters want is to have their misconstrued results laid bare by industry experts in public. No they are just fine with the Kangaroo Court they own.

"... the historian of fascism Robert Paxton warns against describing Donald Trump as fascist because “it’s almost the most powerful epithet you can use.” But in this case, the shoe fits. And here is why.

Like Mussolini, Trump rails against intruders (Mexicans) and enemies (Muslims), mocks those perceived as weak, encourages a violent reckoning with those his followers perceive as the enemy within (the roughing up of protesters at his rallies), flouts the rules of civil political discourse (the Megyn Kelly menstruation spat), and promises to restore the nation to its greatness not by a series of policies, but by the force of his own personality (“I will be great for” fill in the blank).

To quote Paxton again, this time from his seminal "The Anatomy of Fascism": “Fascist leaders made no secret of having no program.” This explains why Trump supporters are not bothered by his ideological malleability and policy contradictions: He was pro-choice before he was pro-life; donated to politicians while now he rails against that practice; married three times and now embraces evangelical Christianity; is the embodiment of capitalism and yet promises to crack down on free trade. In the words of the Italian writer Umberto Eco, fascism was “a beehive of contradictions.” It bears noting that Mussolini was a socialist unionizer before becoming a fascist union buster, a journalist before cracking down on free press, a republican before becoming a monarchist."

 
Yes. It did. The worm has been squashed. :)
That means 0.:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
Hahaha the last thing your fascist masters want is to have their misconstrued results laid bare by industry experts in public. No they are just fine with the Kangaroo Court they own.

"... the historian of fascism Robert Paxton warns against describing Donald Trump as fascist because “it’s almost the most powerful epithet you can use.” But in this case, the shoe fits. And here is why.

Like Mussolini, Trump rails against intruders (Mexicans) and enemies (Muslims), mocks those perceived as weak, encourages a violent reckoning with those his followers perceive as the enemy within (the roughing up of protesters at his rallies), flouts the rules of civil political discourse (the Megyn Kelly menstruation spat), and promises to restore the nation to its greatness not by a series of policies, but by the force of his own personality (“I will be great for” fill in the blank).

To quote Paxton again, this time from his seminal "The Anatomy of Fascism": “Fascist leaders made no secret of having no program.” This explains why Trump supporters are not bothered by his ideological malleability and policy contradictions: He was pro-choice before he was pro-life; donated to politicians while now he rails against that practice; married three times and now embraces evangelical Christianity; is the embodiment of capitalism and yet promises to crack down on free trade. In the words of the Italian writer Umberto Eco, fascism was “a beehive of contradictions.” It bears noting that Mussolini was a socialist unionizer before becoming a fascist union buster, a journalist before cracking down on free press, a republican before becoming a monarchist."

:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
How can they say there is a lack of evidence until the hear it? They can't. Cases were refused for other bogus reasons.

Please stop pushing your conspiracy theory that the election was stolen you are threatening our democracy. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
In cases that didn't lack standing, judges heard it, you moron. That's what they do. They look at the evidence and determine if there's sufficient evidence to toss the defendant's motion to dismiss.
 
In cases that didn't lack standing, judges heard it, you moron. That's what they do. They look at the evidence and determine if there's sufficient evidence to toss the defendant's motion to dismiss.
The conspiracy you are pushing is hurting this country. The election was stolen. :mm:
 

Forum List

Back
Top