Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Solar and wind is free?
I'm surprised you're smart enough to turn on your computer.
Once the first kilowatt hour comes out, the next are virtually free.
Which fossil fuel can claim that?
And after those virtually free kwhs, it's still more expensive and less reliable.
That first kilowatt hour must be an expensive mother fucker, eh?
Once the first kilowatt hour comes out, the next are virtually free.
Which fossil fuel can claim that?
And after those virtually free kwhs, it's still more expensive and less reliable.
That first kilowatt hour must be an expensive mother fucker, eh?
Which fossil fuel can claim that?
Fossil fuels include coal, oil, and natural gas.
Which one?
Once the first kilowatt hour comes out, the next are virtually free.
Which fossil fuel can claim that?
And after those virtually free kwhs, it's still more expensive and less reliable.
That first kilowatt hour must be an expensive mother fucker, eh?
Which fossil fuel can claim that?
Fossil fuels include coal, oil, and natural gas.
Which one?
And after those virtually free kwhs, it's still more expensive and less reliable.
That first kilowatt hour must be an expensive mother fucker, eh?
Which fossil fuel can claim that?
Fossil fuels include coal, oil, and natural gas.
Which one?
Hey genius,,,, About these free electrons of yours... As the 1st class engineer and scientist that youare ----- SURELY you can tell us all how many days of free energy it takes TO BREAK EVEN on a home solar installation... DO IT with and WITHOUT financing costs and insurance...
About ten years....
The good thing about solar and wind is within the reality we don't have to
1. Mine, pump or strip mine for coal, natural gas or oil.
2. No expensive trains, studies looking for new energy or pipelines.
3. The resource of wind and solar energy is infite.
Sure in most areas it is more expensive as of this time...BUT only if you don't consider the 3 points made above.
About ten years....
The good thing about solar and wind is within the reality we don't have to
1. Mine, pump or strip mine for coal, natural gas or oil.
2. No expensive trains, studies looking for new energy or pipelines.
3. The resource of wind and solar energy is infite.
Sure in most areas it is more expensive as of this time...BUT only if you don't consider the 3 points made above.
About ten years....
The good thing about solar and wind is within the reality we don't have to
1. Mine, pump or strip mine for coal, natural gas or oil.
2. No expensive trains, studies looking for new energy or pipelines.
3. The resource of wind and solar energy is infite.
Sure in most areas it is more expensive as of this time...BUT only if you don't consider the 3 points made above.
Wrong. Solar and wind are more expensive, and less reliable, even if you consider your 3 points.
About ten years....
The good thing about solar and wind is within the reality we don't have to
1. Mine, pump or strip mine for coal, natural gas or oil.
2. No expensive trains, studies looking for new energy or pipelines.
3. The resource of wind and solar energy is infite.
Sure in most areas it is more expensive as of this time...BUT only if you don't consider the 3 points made above.
Wrong. Solar and wind are more expensive, and less reliable, even if you consider your 3 points.
Not to mention it's difficult to store wind energy....which bring it down on the practically list.
And fossil fuel plants are built for free, right? And so they require no financing. And nothing ever breaks or wears out. They have no moving parts. And they use no fuel.
Right?
Right?
Right?
And fossil fuel plants are built for free, right? And so they require no financing. And nothing ever breaks or wears out. They have no moving parts. And they use no fuel.
Right?
Right?
Right?
And fossil fuel plants are built for free, right? And so they require no financing. And nothing ever breaks or wears out. They have no moving parts. And they use no fuel.
Right?
Right?
Right?
And you know how to eliminate all the above?
Please do tell me how.
So far none of your kindred spirit in this forum did.
Here is the problem:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/8314775-post1795.html
And fossil fuel plants are built for free, right? And so they require no financing. And nothing ever breaks or wears out. They have no moving parts. And they use no fuel.
Right?
Right?
Right?
And you know how to eliminate all the above?
Please do tell me how.
So far none of your kindred spirit in this forum did.
Here is the problem:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/8314775-post1795.html
And fossil fuel plants are built for free, right? And so they require no financing. And nothing ever breaks or wears out. They have no moving parts. And they use no fuel.
Right?
Right?
Right?
And you know how to eliminate all the above?
Please do tell me how.
So far none of your kindred spirit in this forum did.
Here is the problem:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/8314775-post1795.html
The problem is that you can't imagine anything but the past and that's over.
And fossil fuel plants are built for free, right? And so they require no financing. And nothing ever breaks or wears out. They have no moving parts. And they use no fuel.
Right?
Right?
Right?
And you know how to eliminate all the above?
Please do tell me how.
So far none of your kindred spirit in this forum did.
Here is the problem:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/8314775-post1795.html
Meister said:You must have glossed over Polarbear's last sentence when he stated, "the only thing that you guys can do and always have done so far, is responding with the usual evasive troll crap remarks."
You sure highlighted that with your post.
You're trying to deflect the argument. The point is that solar and wind, when compared to fossil fuel use, do NOT present any additional problems and eliminate several. If you want to continue to try to make engineering arguments against alternative energy technologies, you need to start comparing them to the technologies they would replace, not pretending they've appeared in a vacuum or in some utopia where energy falls freely from the sky. Oh, wait... it does.
And fossil fuel plants are built for free, right? And so they require no financing. And nothing ever breaks or wears out. They have no moving parts. And they use no fuel.
Right?
Right?
Right?
And you know how to eliminate all the above?
Please do tell me how.
So far none of your kindred spirit in this forum did.
Here is the problem:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/8314775-post1795.html
Meister said:You must have glossed over Polarbear's last sentence when he stated, "the only thing that you guys can do and always have done so far, is responding with the usual evasive troll crap remarks."
You sure highlighted that with your post.
Try this one then.
You're trying to deflect the argument. The point is that solar and wind, when compared to fossil fuel use, do NOT present any additional problems and eliminate several. If you want to continue to try to make engineering arguments against alternative energy technologies, you need to start comparing them to the technologies they would replace, not pretending they've appeared in a vacuum or in some utopia where energy falls freely from the sky. Oh, wait... it does.
Do YOU have a meaningful response?
