Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess you believe in the Fossil Fuel Fairy. Bringing energy to good little girls and boys worldwide.
I don't. Mankind invented and built the fossil fuel world as a good, though temporary solution, now we can build the permanent solution.
Don't worry, you don't have to do anything. The adults will handle it.
I guess you believe in the Fossil Fuel Fairy.
I believe in markets. Keep government the fuck out of it, energy will be supplied.
There isn't a market in which government is NOT involved. You didn't know this? Huh.
This pretty much what's going on with the exception of the high risk technology development.
You think the government is keeping out of the energy markets? LOL!
I'm sorry that your Alzheimer's meds have stopped working.
It does explain the declining quality of your posts.
Speaking of the quality of posts, take this one for instance. What does it say, really. It says what you wish to be true. No evidence, no factual support, not even why you wish it was true.
Pretty shabby for a guy who fancies himself as smart.
I guess you believe in the Fossil Fuel Fairy. Bringing energy to good little girls and boys worldwide.
I don't. Mankind invented and built the fossil fuel world as a good, though temporary solution, now we can build the permanent solution.
Don't worry, you don't have to do anything. The adults will handle it.
I guess you believe in the Fossil Fuel Fairy.
I believe in markets. Keep government the fuck out of it, energy will be supplied.
There isn't a market in which government is NOT involved. You didn't know this? Huh.
You think the government is keeping out of the energy markets? LOL!
I'm sorry that your Alzheimer's meds have stopped working.
It does explain the declining quality of your posts.
Speaking of the quality of posts, take this one for instance. What does it say, really. It says what you wish to be true. No evidence, no factual support, not even why you wish it was true.
Pretty shabby for a guy who fancies himself as smart.
What does it say, really.
It says that if you believe the government is keeping out of the energy markets, you are either really, really stupid, or you're losing your marbles.
So what you are telling us is that you don't believe that NOAA should be spending tax payer money to "help society cope with, and adapt to, today's variations in climate and to prepare for tomorrow's"? You prefer the head in the sand method, do you?
So what you are telling us is that you don't believe that NOAA should be spending tax payer money to "help society cope with, and adapt to, today's variations in climate and to prepare for tomorrow's"? You prefer the head in the sand method, do you?
I equate all the AGW alarmist claptrap the same as I view that laughable TV show "Finding Bigfoot". The guy gets to hop around the planet seeking "squatch". He gets to play with all sorts of high tech toys (that he clearly doesn't really know how to use effectively) and he gets paid to do it.
In other words his show is the perfect analog for the AGW pushers....if he admits that there is no "squatch" he no longer gets all those things.
Funny how that works isn't it.
Speaking of the quality of posts, take this one for instance. What does it say, really. It says what you wish to be true. No evidence, no factual support, not even why you wish it was true.
Pretty shabby for a guy who fancies himself as smart.
What does it say, really.
It says that if you believe the government is keeping out of the energy markets, you are either really, really stupid, or you're losing your marbles.
Give us a list of government funded power plants.
So what you are telling us is that you don't believe that NOAA should be spending tax payer money to "help society cope with, and adapt to, today's variations in climate and to prepare for tomorrow's"? You prefer the head in the sand method, do you?
I equate all the AGW alarmist claptrap the same as I view that laughable TV show "Finding Bigfoot". The guy gets to hop around the planet seeking "squatch". He gets to play with all sorts of high tech toys (that he clearly doesn't really know how to use effectively) and he gets paid to do it.
In other words his show is the perfect analog for the AGW pushers....if he admits that there is no "squatch" he no longer gets all those things.
Funny how that works isn't it.
The people on shows like that, deny not only science but common sense as well. Just like AGW deniers. Or peak oil deniers.
I equate all the AGW alarmist claptrap the same as I view that laughable TV show "Finding Bigfoot". The guy gets to hop around the planet seeking "squatch". He gets to play with all sorts of high tech toys (that he clearly doesn't really know how to use effectively) and he gets paid to do it.
In other words his show is the perfect analog for the AGW pushers....if he admits that there is no "squatch" he no longer gets all those things.
Funny how that works isn't it.
The people on shows like that, deny not only science but common sense as well. Just like AGW deniers. Or peak oil deniers.
Funny about peak oil. They told us that we would be out of oil NOW. We now have more proven oil reserves than when they began telling us we would be out by now.
You might want to come up with a better example than that one pardner....it exposes your lack of common sense.
So what you are telling us is that you don't believe that NOAA should be spending tax payer money to "help society cope with, and adapt to, today's variations in climate and to prepare for tomorrow's"? You prefer the head in the sand method, do you?
So what you are telling us is that you don't believe that NOAA should be spending tax payer money to "help society cope with, and adapt to, today's variations in climate and to prepare for tomorrow's"? You prefer the head in the sand method, do you?
Not at all. I prefer science that constantly revising the knowledge REGARDLESS of what story has laid out for the future. Meaning that "informing the public" should INCLUDE the possibility that AGW hype is overblown or badly conceived..
That NOAA comment doesn't have anything do with the science of "modeling, measuring and understanding climate". That's a description of what NOAA INTERESTS your science should support...
The NOAA grant description I gave you is NOT A SCIENCE statement. It's a CLUE to the bidder about WHAT CONCLUSIONS they need to support to RETAIN that pot of money. Should your research product not fit that narrative, or you're not willing to FORCE IT to fit that narrative --- you shouldn't waste your time applying..
Note the emphasis all over that Grant description on increasingly extreme weather and changes with important implications for public policy and safety. Dont even think about telling them that's not gonna happen..
The people on shows like that, deny not only science but common sense as well. Just like AGW deniers. Or peak oil deniers.
Funny about peak oil. They told us that we would be out of oil NOW. We now have more proven oil reserves than when they began telling us we would be out by now.
You might want to come up with a better example than that one pardner....it exposes your lack of common sense.
Who said that we'd be out of oil now?
You're another one believing in the Fossil Fuel Fairy bring unlimited energy to good little girls and boys.
What you really want is the big oil fairy squeezing the last drop of profit out of a world stranded on the highway with no gas.
Funny about peak oil. They told us that we would be out of oil NOW. We now have more proven oil reserves than when they began telling us we would be out by now.
You might want to come up with a better example than that one pardner....it exposes your lack of common sense.
Who said that we'd be out of oil now?
You're another one believing in the Fossil Fuel Fairy bring unlimited energy to good little girls and boys.
What you really want is the big oil fairy squeezing the last drop of profit out of a world stranded on the highway with no gas.
These guys have repeatedly.............
Newsletter
Hubbert's Peak, Current Events
Living with the Age of Entropy | George Monbiot
ASPO - The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas
There's hundreds more.........
I just scanned that ASPO letter. It was quoting T Boone Pickens saying world production was 84 million barrels a day and and he didn't see it getting any higher. That was 2005. I just looked up current world oil production, eight years later: 84 million barrels a day.
World demand has flattened since 2007 --- Why would you suspect we'd be pumping MORE oil out per day?? These "little details" just seem to escape the minimized cognitive processes of leftists..
Why use fossil fuels when we have the wind and sunshine? Why the long chain of production when we can have nature make it and send it to the grid.
One makes more sense.
