Palestine Today

[rylah]

Nobody has ever posted any proof that Israel is not an occupation for the purpose of colonization.

What territory does Israel occupy that wasn't vested with the sovereignty of its' people?

Where's the answer from team Hamas?

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Sovereignty (in this case) is understood to be that territory over which the people of the State Israel exercises and enforces its Supreme Authority to the exclusion of any other States (including the external Arab Palestinians).

He talks about “ fake Armistice Lines” yet when you ask what the “ real ones” are there is no response

Then where are they?

(COMMENT)

This is a distorted counterview made to slide away from where sovereignties are bounded in the reality of the physical world.

They want to say that the (as an example) Security Barrier is a form of apartheid, yet they are not willing to recognize that the sovereignty on either side of the Security Barrier is different from the other side. They want to claim that they are stupid to the point that they cannot recognize the territorial border markings and barriers; yet, the Arab Palestinians just tried in the last few months to breach these barriers that they cannot see or recognize. AND the Arab Palestinians want to claim that they were (as our friend PF Tinmre says) born under occupation (effective control by the Israelis) yet, they cannot recognize the difference between the territorial atmosphere of the territories and Israel.

Most Respectfully,
R

AND the Arab Palestinians want to claim that they were (as our friend PF Tinmre says) born under occupation (effective control by the Israelis) yet, they cannot recognize the difference between the territorial atmosphere of the territories and Israel.

Nobody has ever posted any proof that Israel is not an occupation for the purpose of colonization.

You have not proven that it is an “ occupation “ that the U.N. endorsed on May 14, 1948.
You have also referred to the Armistice Lines as “ fake borders” yet when asked what the “ real borders” should be there is no response

The 1949 UN Armistice Agreements divided Palestine into three areas of occupation. I have seen nothing since then to change that status.

Yawn..,, Not true. I have previously posted proof that the International Community OFFICIALLY recognized the “ occupied” areas of Gaza, W. Bank and E. Jerusalem part of both Egypt and Jordan.
Regarding your “ map” prior to 1948 without Israel existing is the goal of the Arab World which is one more reason why “ Right of Return” will never happen

 

[USAF 2023]

Protesting Israel’s existence since 1948???? “ Right of Return” so they can introduce havoc and start a possible civil Wsr???

 

[Hollie]

I always get a laugh from the silly YouTube videos / blogs you cut and paste.

What, exactly, is an “international journalist” as opposed to a, you know, regular journalist?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[rylah]

Nakba myth and other 1000 and 1 Arabian night fairy tales:

 

[P F Tinmore]

Nakba myth and other 1000 and 1 Arabian night fairy tales:

 

[Hollie]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

You're waving the flag of surrender.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Bases for the Palestinian Refugees’ Right of Return under International Law: Beyond General Assembly Resolution 194

The legal bases for return can be found in eight branches of international law: (1) inter-State nationality law, (2) law of State succession, (3) human rights law, (4) humanitarian law, (5) law of State responsibility, (6) refugee law, (7) UN law, and (8) natural/customary law. These legal foundations are briefly highlighted here.

Bases for the Palestinian Refugees’ Right of Return under International Law: Beyond General Assembly Resolution 194 – Cambridge International Law Journal

 

[Hollie]

Bases for the Palestinian Refugees’ Right of Return under International Law: Beyond General Assembly Resolution 194

The legal bases for return can be found in eight branches of international law: (1) inter-State nationality law, (2) law of State succession, (3) human rights law, (4) humanitarian law, (5) law of State responsibility, (6) refugee law, (7) UN law, and (8) natural/customary law. These legal foundations are briefly highlighted here.

Bases for the Palestinian Refugees’ Right of Return under International Law: Beyond General Assembly Resolution 194 – Cambridge International Law Journal

Terribly flawed with an unsupportable definition of so-called "refugee".

Why not cut and paste the usual, and similarly silly Susan Akram YouTube video?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[rylah]

Nakba myth and other 1000 and 1 Arabian night fairy tales:

The Hoax of Ilan Pappe Revealed

 

[Shusha]

Bases for the Palestinian Refugees’ Right of Return under International Law: Beyond General Assembly Resolution 194

The legal bases for return can be found in eight branches of international law: (1) inter-State nationality law, (2) law of State succession, (3) human rights law, (4) humanitarian law, (5) law of State responsibility, (6) refugee law, (7) UN law, and (8) natural/customary law. These legal foundations are briefly highlighted here.

Bases for the Palestinian Refugees’ Right of Return under International Law: Beyond General Assembly Resolution 194 – Cambridge International Law Journal

This article is full of political doctrine (hogwash) disguised as "international law" in order to justify a particular political position. It confuses different aspects of law, mislabels and even adapts different, competing laws as being equally applicable.

Let's begin with basics.

How many nationalities exist, currently, in the geographical territory commonly referred to as Palestine?
Who holds sovereignty over the geographical territory commonly referred to as Palestine?
How is nationality of individuals determined in international law?
Can individuals choose their own nationality though actions related to self-determination?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

Watch how this little Palestinian girl reacted angrily to the demolition of her house by the Israeli occupation authorities in al-Walaja village.



Does Israel have a new Ahed Tamimi on its hands?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]