Palestine Today

[Hollie]

How to prepare financially for time in prison

 

[Hollie]

6 Prison Tips to Increase Your Mental Toughness

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestinians and Israelis activists stoped Israeli bulldozers,Nil'in, west Bank

 

[P F Tinmore]

A Discussion with Haidar Eid and Mazin Qumsiyeh.

 

[Hollie]

Palestinian Journalist Nasser Al-Laham: The Jews Rule Washington, Just Like They Rule Tel Aviv

 

[Hollie]

Ahh, yes. The Arab-Moslem Death Cult aka “Pal’istanians”.

No surprise that they are just a collection of islamic terrorist franchises.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Mazin Qumsiyeh - Palestine Solidarity Conference

 

[Hollie]

Don’t think Islamic terrorist retrogrades, think “Peace Partners”

 

[Hollie]

I know, right?

The first thing that comes to mind is women who are self-empowered in spite of the retrograde politico-religious ideology that forces them into Shame-Sacks, as opposed to women who are treated as mere property by a seriously insecure and intellectually / emotionally stunted bunch of men who literally despise women.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Syrians would shoot down on Israeli farms from the Golan Heights. Jordan bombarded West Jerusalem during the 6-Day-War of 1967. And Hezbollah continued to throw rockets at Israel from Lebanon, even after Israel withdrew its forces from there.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Aww, St. Ahed...Tissues please.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ et al,

Almost any sovereignty that can create laws and exercise regime authority has, as a consequence, a decision making process that feels and responds to (in some fashion) the political influence and legitimacy from competing sources that are centered outside the decision making process itself. While there are many factors internal to the inner workings and hidden mechanisms of government and the decision making process, the issue here is a direct complaint, usually made by an inferior influence or contaminated source, suggesting that "the Jews rule" Washington. It is an attempt to quietly imply that pro-Israeli advocates radiate some sort of force that effects the governing conduct within America • particular activity or spheres that are favorable to Israel. In terms of "rule" → it implies resources both internal and external to the decision making process.

It also, ever so delicately, suttlely ad precise, suggest that both the executive branch and the legislative branch are under the influence of a foreign power.bn ,bhhj

Palestinian Journalist Nasser Al-Laham: The Jews Rule Washington, Just Like They Rule Tel Aviv

(COMMENT)

With political legitimacy comes the associated obligations; obligations to the people of the realm and the obligation to the invested determination of the majority.

In the utilitarian view, the legitimate political authority of the Jewish State is well grounded on the principle of utility. This conception of legitimacy is necessarily a moralized one: the legitimacy of political authority depends on what morality requires. In the case of the Jewish State, it operates largely under normative ethics holding that the best practice (given the circumstances of the time), and morality of the action (given the customary law specific to the region) is the one that maximizes utility of the resources, capacity and capabilities of the Israeli nation (the citizenry experiences in a practical way the Beneficial Consequences). Israel is a nation that values rational prudence.

IF, as in the case of the Arab Palestinians, the citizenry fail to experience consequences as a result of the ineffectual leadership, policies and economic trends, THEN that failed leadership will eventually loose the trust and confidence required to maintain effective control and sovereign authority.

One of the many important Beneficial Consequences is the application of such cordial relations as to entice positive political-military, economic, commercial, research and development, and the integration of resulting science and technological advantages derived therefrom. Yes, the Jewish State attempts to cultivate such beneficial relationships . This is very different from the Case of the Arab Palestinian which carries the principle objectives of attempting to interrupt allied relations of the Israeli.

There is a huge difference in the Arab Palestinian attempting to interdict, disrupt, undermine and destroy the positive foreign relations with that of the Jewish State, → as apposed to Israeli development of mutual beneficial relationships.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hollie]

Actually, all you wish is to have disposable Arabs-Moslems to use as a means to promote your rabid Jew hatreds.

 

[Hollie]

 

[Shusha]

Free from what?

Jews?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ et al,

Almost any sovereignty that can create laws and exercise regime authority has, as a consequence, a decision making process that feels and responds to (in some fashion) the political influence and legitimacy from competing sources that are centered outside the decision making process itself. While there are many factors internal to the inner workings and hidden mechanisms of government and the decision making process, the issue here is a direct complaint, usually made by an inferior influence or contaminated source, suggesting that "the Jews rule" Washington. It is an attempt to quietly imply that pro-Israeli advocates radiate some sort of force that effects the governing conduct within America • particular activity or spheres that are favorable to Israel. In terms of "rule" → it implies resources both internal and external to the decision making process.

It also, ever so delicately, suttlely ad precise, suggest that both the executive branch and the legislative branch are under the influence of a foreign power.bn ,bhhj

Palestinian Journalist Nasser Al-Laham: The Jews Rule Washington, Just Like They Rule Tel Aviv

(COMMENT)

With political legitimacy comes the associated obligations; obligations to the people of the realm and the obligation to the invested determination of the majority.

In the utilitarian view, the legitimate political authority of the Jewish State is well grounded on the principle of utility. This conception of legitimacy is necessarily a moralized one: the legitimacy of political authority depends on what morality requires. In the case of the Jewish State, it operates largely under normative ethics holding that the best practice (given the circumstances of the time), and morality of the action (given the customary law specific to the region) is the one that maximizes utility of the resources, capacity and capabilities of the Israeli nation (the citizenry experiences in a practical way the Beneficial Consequences). Israel is a nation that values rational prudence.

IF, as in the case of the Arab Palestinians, the citizenry fail to experience consequences as a result of the ineffectual leadership, policies and economic trends, THEN that failed leadership will eventually loose the trust and confidence required to maintain effective control and sovereign authority.

One of the many important Beneficial Consequences is the application of such cordial relations as to entice positive political-military, economic, commercial, research and development, and the integration of resulting science and technological advantages derived therefrom. Yes, the Jewish State attempts to cultivate such beneficial relationships . This is very different from the Case of the Arab Palestinian which carries the principle objectives of attempting to interrupt allied relations of the Israeli.

There is a huge difference in the Arab Palestinian attempting to interdict, disrupt, undermine and destroy the positive foreign relations with that of the Jewish State, → as apposed to Israeli development of mutual beneficial relationships.

Most Respectfully,
R

What are you trying to say?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]