Palestinian propaganda? Not in France, anymore

[Lipush]

A French court decided lately that when concerning the lawsuits against the Israeli railway in Jerusalem, Israel is not an occupying force in Judea and Samaria, neither in Jerusalem.

The decision was due to the lawsuit of the "French-Palestinian solidary movement" which claimed that the Israeli railway in Jerusalem crosses the green-line, and therefore disrespect the Geneva agreements.

The French court rejected the Palestinian claims, saying that according to the Hague convention (Article 43), legit will be the occupying authorities in the specific territories, if and when in those territories, there is the attempt to keep order and normality.

Since the Geneva convention is about agreements between states, it doesn't apply, says the French court- for the simply reason that the PA and PLO are not recognized as states. "Propaganda cannot replace the law", it was said, and dismissed were also the claims of humanitarian crisis, one which wasn't found. the solidary movement was to pay 30,000E for the companies sued.

La Cour d?appel de Versailles (OLP c/ Alstom et Veolia) conclut que l?occupation par Israël n?est pas illégale | Dreuz.info

???? ? ??? ??????? ?????????: ??? ???? ????? ? ?????? ???? ????? ?????

 

[MJB12741]

Vive la france!

a french court decided lately that when concerning the lawsuits against the israeli railway in jerusalem, israel is not an occupying force in judea and samaria, neither in jerusalem.

The decision was due to the lawsuit of the "french-palestinian solidary movement" which claimed that the israeli railway in jerusalem crosses the green-line, and therefore disrespect the geneva agreements.

The french court rejected the palestinian claims, saying that according to the hague convention (article 43), legit will be the occupying authorities in the specific territories, if and when in those territories, there is the attempt to keep order and normality.

Since the geneva convention is about agreements between states, it doesn't apply, says the french court- for the simply reason that the pa and plo are not recognized as states. "propaganda cannot replace the law", it was said, and dismissed were also the claims of humanitarian crisis, one which wasn't found. The solidary movement was to pay 30,000e for the companies sued.

la cour d?appel de versailles (olp c/ alstom et veolia) conclut que l?occupation par israël n?est pas illégale | dreuz.info

???? ? ??? ??????? ?????????: ??? ???? ????? ? ?????? ???? ????? ?????

 

[Hossfly]

Vive la france!

a french court decided lately that when concerning the lawsuits against the israeli railway in jerusalem, israel is not an occupying force in judea and samaria, neither in jerusalem.

The decision was due to the lawsuit of the "french-palestinian solidary movement" which claimed that the israeli railway in jerusalem crosses the green-line, and therefore disrespect the geneva agreements.

The french court rejected the palestinian claims, saying that according to the hague convention (article 43), legit will be the occupying authorities in the specific territories, if and when in those territories, there is the attempt to keep order and normality.

Since the geneva convention is about agreements between states, it doesn't apply, says the french court- for the simply reason that the pa and plo are not recognized as states. "propaganda cannot replace the law", it was said, and dismissed were also the claims of humanitarian crisis, one which wasn't found. The solidary movement was to pay 30,000e for the companies sued.

la cour d?appel de versailles (olp c/ alstom et veolia) conclut que l?occupation par israël n?est pas illégale | dreuz.info

???? ? ??? ??????? ?????????: ??? ???? ????? ? ?????? ???? ????? ?????

France lately has shown signs of developing a backbone. I'm impressed.

 

[Roudy]

A French court decided lately that when concerning the lawsuits against the Israeli railway in Jerusalem, Israel is not an occupying force in Judea and Samaria, neither in Jerusalem.

The decision was due to the lawsuit of the "French-Palestinian solidary movement" which claimed that the Israeli railway in Jerusalem crosses the green-line, and therefore disrespect the Geneva agreements.

The French court rejected the Palestinian claims, saying that according to the Hague convention (Article 43), legit will be the occupying authorities in the specific territories, if and when in those territories, there is the attempt to keep order and normality.

Since the Geneva convention is about agreements between states, it doesn't apply, says the French court- for the simply reason that the PA and PLO are not recognized as states. "Propaganda cannot replace the law", it was said, and dismissed were also the claims of humanitarian crisis, one which wasn't found. the solidary movement was to pay 30,000E for the companies sued.

La Cour d?appel de Versailles (OLP c/ Alstom et Veolia) conclut que l?occupation par Israël n?est pas illégale | Dreuz.info

???? ? ??? ??????? ?????????: ??? ???? ????? ? ?????? ???? ????? ?????

Bwahahahahaha! This is gonna kill the Pali terrorist lovers who were telling us about how the divestment movement is gaining steam just because a bunch of crazy liberals in Berkeley decided to vote for it. (By the way that's not a done deal, there are signatures being gathered as we speak to turn that around) .

I think I'm gonna start calling them French fries instead of independence fries.

 

[pbel]

A French court decided lately that when concerning the lawsuits against the Israeli railway in Jerusalem, Israel is not an occupying force in Judea and Samaria, neither in Jerusalem.

The decision was due to the lawsuit of the "French-Palestinian solidary movement" which claimed that the Israeli railway in Jerusalem crosses the green-line, and therefore disrespect the Geneva agreements.

The French court rejected the Palestinian claims, saying that according to the Hague convention (Article 43), legit will be the occupying authorities in the specific territories, if and when in those territories, there is the attempt to keep order and normality.

Since the Geneva convention is about agreements between states, it doesn't apply, says the French court- for the simply reason that the PA and PLO are not recognized as states. "Propaganda cannot replace the law", it was said, and dismissed were also the claims of humanitarian crisis, one which wasn't found. the solidary movement was to pay 30,000E for the companies sued.

La Cour d?appel de Versailles (OLP c/ Alstom et Veolia) conclut que l?occupation par Israël n?est pas illégale | Dreuz.info

???? ? ??? ??????? ?????????: ??? ???? ????? ? ?????? ???? ????? ?????

Web Results

U.N. General Assembly votes to recognize Palestinian state - ...

U.N. General Assembly votes to recognize Palestinian state - CBS News...

Nov 29, 2012 ... U.N. General Assembly votes to recognize Palestinian state ... Several key countries, including France, this week announced they would ...

 

[MHunterB]

Even if 'Palestine' is recognized as a state, that's not going to change the French ruling.

 

[Hossfly]

A French court decided lately that when concerning the lawsuits against the Israeli railway in Jerusalem, Israel is not an occupying force in Judea and Samaria, neither in Jerusalem.

The decision was due to the lawsuit of the "French-Palestinian solidary movement" which claimed that the Israeli railway in Jerusalem crosses the green-line, and therefore disrespect the Geneva agreements.

The French court rejected the Palestinian claims, saying that according to the Hague convention (Article 43), legit will be the occupying authorities in the specific territories, if and when in those territories, there is the attempt to keep order and normality.

Since the Geneva convention is about agreements between states, it doesn't apply, says the French court- for the simply reason that the PA and PLO are not recognized as states. "Propaganda cannot replace the law", it was said, and dismissed were also the claims of humanitarian crisis, one which wasn't found. the solidary movement was to pay 30,000E for the companies sued.

La Cour d?appel de Versailles (OLP c/ Alstom et Veolia) conclut que l?occupation par Israël n?est pas illégale | Dreuz.info

???? ? ??? ??????? ?????????: ??? ???? ????? ? ?????? ???? ????? ?????

Web Results

U.N. General Assembly votes to recognize Palestinian state - ...

U.N. General Assembly votes to recognize Palestinian state - CBS News...

Nov 29, 2012 ... U.N. General Assembly votes to recognize Palestinian state ... Several key countries, including France, this week announced they would ...

Meaningless drivel.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Even if 'Palestine' is recognized as a state, that's not going to change the French ruling.

THe French ruling does not change international law, nothing at all has changed. ALL we have is the same Hasbara distortions of truth we have always had. Just LIES AND DECEPTION, that is all this thread is.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

A French court decided lately that when concerning the lawsuits against the Israeli railway in Jerusalem, Israel is not an occupying force in Judea and Samaria, neither in Jerusalem.

The decision was due to the lawsuit of the "French-Palestinian solidary movement" which claimed that the Israeli railway in Jerusalem crosses the green-line, and therefore disrespect the Geneva agreements.

The French court rejected the Palestinian claims, saying that according to the Hague convention (Article 43), legit will be the occupying authorities in the specific territories, if and when in those territories, there is the attempt to keep order and normality.

Since the Geneva convention is about agreements between states, it doesn't apply, says the French court- for the simply reason that the PA and PLO are not recognized as states. "Propaganda cannot replace the law", it was said, and dismissed were also the claims of humanitarian crisis, one which wasn't found. the solidary movement was to pay 30,000E for the companies sued.

La Cour d?appel de Versailles (OLP c/ Alstom et Veolia) conclut que l?occupation par Israël n?est pas illégale | Dreuz.info

???? ? ??? ??????? ?????????: ??? ???? ????? ? ?????? ???? ????? ?????

Web Results

U.N. General Assembly votes to recognize Palestinian state - ...

U.N. General Assembly votes to recognize Palestinian state - CBS News...

Nov 29, 2012 ... U.N. General Assembly votes to recognize Palestinian state ... Several key countries, including France, this week announced they would ...

Meaningless drivel.

I agree, the OP and entire thread are meaningless drivel.