A very interesting issue brought to attention by coyote is the alienation of muslims who
migrate to the arms of their bretheren in muslim countries. The recent celebrity MUJADAD in Chattanooga----who murdered at least four US MILITARY kids for the glory of allah and prestige in the muslim world came out of KUWAIT with a Kuwaiti mother and a Palestinian father-------that makes him for all intents and purposes in Kuwait----a PALESTINIAN-------despised and hated by his own bretheren. Palestinians in Kuwait are considered shit. No wonder the kid was "depressed" enough to become a depraved murderer.If the above is your perception-----then you are mistaken. I have stated that Buddhists have "JUST AS MUCH A RIGHT" to Buddhist cities as muslims do to
muslim cities. There are many many places in the world today----which were once culturally diverse but now either by law or by "customary situation" non-muslims can no longer live-------LOTS AND LOTS. There are places where a Buddhist temple cannot exist. -----as you know------but prefer to ignore. In consideration of that fact---especially the fact that some of those places were, historically --_CENTERS OF BUDDHIST CULTURE-----Buddhists feel a need to have BUDDHIST CITIES . For fun why not visit Saudi Arabia -----set up a tent---have a big giant Baptist prayer fest and then a picnic-----barbecue a pig
Hindus have a horror of eating beef. ------even I----little old me with some very
secularized hindu friends ----never serve beef to them ----only chicken and lamb. -----except for the vegetarians------I give up on them completely. Now go to Saudi Arabia ----sit on a park bench and eat a sandwich during ramadonnadingdong. Another one of my "stories"----when my son was in the navy it was his custom to shepherd his mates around in foreign places-----generally looking for an INDIAN restaurant------he tried it in the UAE----and a nervous hindu started to sweat and whispered anxiously "Ramadan". all sorts of people have reasons not to want-----the "others" around especially if there is a history of being oppressed by those "others"
So because some Muslim countries commit atrocities that makes it ok for others to commit atrocities on people that have never themselves done anything wrong? Is that any different than Hitler's aim of "purifying" Europe?
The Burmese have never been oppressed by Muslims.
your construct makes no sense.-------and is in no way responsive to my post.
I wonder about the mindset of the Chattanooga Mujahad------he acted in the USA-----but did experience life in Kuwait as a despised minority person. Cops have discovered that he was treated for depression as an adolescent. "muslim kid from Kuwait------Palestinian----migrates to USA-------has all kinds of stuff----drugs, depression, this and that --also Palestinian relatives in Jordan----another sorta minority----actually more like majority but DISLIKED-----migrates to the USA and then MURDERS FOR ALLAH. I see a history--------I am into the history of a sickness. It is something I did for years
I haven't read to much about his background - and unfortunately, he's dead so it's hard to know what his thoughts were or why he did what he did.
I see that you are not into psychology----or history. Jesus is dead too----
but "what would jesus have done"-----is a question lots of people ask. Mr Mujahad had seen a psychiatrist-----that guy took notes------and even has a
memory-------guess what ----he is going to be interviewed and the doc's chart is
no longer actually completely -------PRIVILEGED. my guess is that the FBI will get it
So....like Roof, Mr. M is another nutter?
yup and all from the same general pile-------ISLAMO NAZI----the movement was invented more than 1000 years ago as a syncresis of the creed of
CONSTANTINE and the creed of MUHUMMAD. Today ---far from slowing
down ----it is picking up momentum. The very first time I realized that the creed
was becoming very popular was something like (??) 35 years ago although I first encountered it more than 50 years ago. When arafart entered a church----looked
at a statue of Jesus and addressed it with something like "lord jesus.....we adore you etc etc ..." It was notable because muslims do not like to talk to statues and -----in general actually do have a remarkable disdain for anything "Christian" except their notion that jesus was really a muslim and was not crucified. Much
of shariah law in reference to non muslims is a direct lift from Constantine (the Justinian code) I saw the event as the beginning of a growing
Christian/muslim love affair (it may have been more like 40 years ago)