Parents & Teachers Need To Tell Kids That Gays & SCOTUS Are Wrong

[g5000]

I'll just tell them that the SC has made mistakes before, dred scott, jim crow, prohibition, abortion, gay marriage and so on and....... will continue to make mistakes.. No big deal.

Dred Scott = gay marriage

Take a real good look at that kind of thinking, folks. Isn't it just fascinating?

 

[martybegan]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

This is the same tired old bullshit Conservatives have been spouting via the 200 tears between slavery and equal rights for Black people and minorities.
"A little more time" is simply Conservatives way of saying 'not in your lifetime."

Considering I support gay marriage when legislatively enacted, you main consideration of my views is moot. In fact, I figured the 2nd question, that of recognition would have been the one to pass, forcing States not to issue SSM licenses, but to recognize ones issued by other states.

It's ironic and indicative of your lack of understanding of the situation that those 100 years (1877-1960's) of lack of equal rights was created by the very courts you now run to, using the same basic logic being used by your side.

 

[G.T.]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

The will of the people is meaningless when it comes to rights. Tyranny of the majority doesnt win.

B: theres no "my side." That's a rude and uncouth insinuation on your part.

Tyranny of the federal government won in this case.

I guess I have to decide I have the right to bop people in the head with a foam pillow. ITS A RIGHT DAMMIT

Your side, as seen on this board is the side of tyranny and force.

No, common sense is that if the govt called legal marriage a right and theres no reason to exclude gays, then they have that right also.

That this American idea of equal protection escapes you is not anyone else's problem and also the reason you lost. You lose. America is changed forever in this regard. HA-HA.

 

[Bush92]

My children will be taught to treat gay people the same as they want to be treated themselves, and you cannot do shit about it bigot.

So we have two more socialist on the way to fuck up the world.

 

[G.T.]

My children will be taught to treat gay people the same as they want to be treated themselves, and you cannot do shit about it bigot.

So we have two more socialist on the way to fuck up the world.

Gay marriage is.socialism?

Hey does being old come with mental.retardation for EVERYONE?

ILL begin my quest for the fountain of youth.

 

[protectionist]

These are just to make everyone feel a little better

 

[Bush92]

My children will be taught to treat gay people the same as they want to be treated themselves, and you cannot do shit about it bigot.

So we have two more socialist on the way to fuck up the world.

Gay marriage is.socialism?

Hey does being old come with mental.retardation for EVERYONE?

ILL begin my quest for the fountain of youth.

It's part of the Socialist Party Platform : Platform - SOCIALIST PARTY USA
Also, when the people of the respective states as per the 10th Amendment freely choose to protect marriage rights as between a man and a woman and view homosexuality as deviant behavior that is their prerogative. When the federal courts step in and usurp the will of the people that is an Orwellian abuse of power by the central authority.

 

[ClosedCaption]

This is no time for parents, teachers, clergy, counselers, sports coaches and any adults who children look to for guidance, to be silent. This is NOT the time for people to try to be uninvolved. The gay disease and its supporters in half of the Supreme Court must be denounced loud and clear, for the foolish and mistaken notion that homosexuality has any validity at all. Kids, age 13 and older, should be carefully counseled to stop this plague of false thought from infecting their young minds.

With a Supreme Court ruling in favor of same sex marriage, it is now much easier for pervert gays to spread their sickness to children by using the Supreme Court decision as a tool to denormalize kids, much the same way that Muslim propagandists use freedom of speech to spread their hateful and destructive message of Islam, spread by Muslim Brotherhood groups.

What happened to you guys staying the fuck out of my house?

 

[G.T.]

My children will be taught to treat gay people the same as they want to be treated themselves, and you cannot do shit about it bigot.

So we have two more socialist on the way to fuck up the world.

Gay marriage is.socialism?

Hey does being old come with mental.retardation for EVERYONE?

ILL begin my quest for the fountain of youth.

It's part of the Socialist Party Platform : Platform - SOCIALIST PARTY USA
Also, when the people of the respective states as per the 10th Amendment freely choose to protect marriage rights as between a man and a woman and view homosexuality as deviant behavior that is their prerogative. When the federal courts step in and usurp the will of the people that is an Orwellian abuse of power by the central authority.

You cant take away the rights of others, that is tyrrannical.

Gays being able to marry did nothing whatsoever to YOUR right to marry....so busy bodying about what other people do with their lives is your own form of tyranny. Fact

 

[Bush92]

My children will be taught to treat gay people the same as they want to be treated themselves, and you cannot do shit about it bigot.

So we have two more socialist on the way to fuck up the world.

Gay marriage is.socialism?

Hey does being old come with mental.retardation for EVERYONE?

ILL begin my quest for the fountain of youth.

It's part of the Socialist Party Platform : Platform - SOCIALIST PARTY USA
Also, when the people of the respective states as per the 10th Amendment freely choose to protect marriage rights as between a man and a woman and view homosexuality as deviant behavior that is their prerogative. When the federal courts step in and usurp the will of the people that is an Orwellian abuse of power by the central authority.

You cant take away the rights of others, that is tyrrannical.

Gays being able to marry did nothing whatsoever to YOUR right to marry....so busy bodying about what other people do with their lives is your own form of tyranny. Fact

So a pedophile has a right to molest? It's his sexuality?

 

[g5000]

My children will be taught to treat gay people the same as they want to be treated themselves, and you cannot do shit about it bigot.

So we have two more socialist on the way to fuck up the world.

Gay marriage is.socialism?

Of course it is! Just like interracial marriages are communism.

Same bullshit, different decade. Bush92 is the political descendant of these fellas right here:

 

[reconmark]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

This is the same tired old bullshit Conservatives have been spouting via the 200 tears between slavery and equal rights for Black people and minorities.
"A little more time" is simply Conservatives way of saying 'not in your lifetime."

Considering I support gay marriage when legislatively enacted, you main consideration of my views is moot. In fact, I figured the 2nd question, that of recognition would have been the one to pass, forcing States not to issue SSM licenses, but to recognize ones issued by other states.

It's ironic and indicative of your lack of understanding of the situation that those 100 years (1877-1960's) of lack of equal rights was created by the very courts you now run to, using the same basic logic being used by your side.

No, what's ironic is that you are attempting to use the same "logic" that the WASPs have historically always tempted to use when restricting and denying the rights of others...

 

[g5000]

So a pedophile has a right to molest? It's his sexuality?

Two adults having consensual sex is harmless. Whereas an adult molesting a child is not.

Hope that helps you understand the HUGE difference, retard. Let me know if I need to explain any of the bigger words to you.

 

[martybegan]

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

This is the same tired old bullshit Conservatives have been spouting via the 200 tears between slavery and equal rights for Black people and minorities.
"A little more time" is simply Conservatives way of saying 'not in your lifetime."

Considering I support gay marriage when legislatively enacted, you main consideration of my views is moot. In fact, I figured the 2nd question, that of recognition would have been the one to pass, forcing States not to issue SSM licenses, but to recognize ones issued by other states.

It's ironic and indicative of your lack of understanding of the situation that those 100 years (1877-1960's) of lack of equal rights was created by the very courts you now run to, using the same basic logic being used by your side.

No, what's ironic is that you are attempting to use the same "logic" that the WASPs have historically always tempted to use when restricting and denying the rights of others...

Well considering its not actually a right, no matter how much you say it is.

 

[mdk]

These are just to make everyone feel a little better

Big deal. I am glad those could cheer you up though. It seems you certainly need it.

 

[martybegan]

My children will be taught to treat gay people the same as they want to be treated themselves, and you cannot do shit about it bigot.

So we have two more socialist on the way to fuck up the world.

Gay marriage is.socialism?

Hey does being old come with mental.retardation for EVERYONE?

ILL begin my quest for the fountain of youth.

It's part of the Socialist Party Platform : Platform - SOCIALIST PARTY USA
Also, when the people of the respective states as per the 10th Amendment freely choose to protect marriage rights as between a man and a woman and view homosexuality as deviant behavior that is their prerogative. When the federal courts step in and usurp the will of the people that is an Orwellian abuse of power by the central authority.

You cant take away the rights of others, that is tyrrannical.

Gays being able to marry did nothing whatsoever to YOUR right to marry....so busy bodying about what other people do with their lives is your own form of tyranny. Fact

yet forcing people to bake cakes is somehow "freedom".

Asshole.

 

[g5000]

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

This is the same tired old bullshit Conservatives have been spouting via the 200 tears between slavery and equal rights for Black people and minorities.
"A little more time" is simply Conservatives way of saying 'not in your lifetime."

Considering I support gay marriage when legislatively enacted, you main consideration of my views is moot. In fact, I figured the 2nd question, that of recognition would have been the one to pass, forcing States not to issue SSM licenses, but to recognize ones issued by other states.

It's ironic and indicative of your lack of understanding of the situation that those 100 years (1877-1960's) of lack of equal rights was created by the very courts you now run to, using the same basic logic being used by your side.

No, what's ironic is that you are attempting to use the same "logic" that the WASPs have historically always tempted to use when restricting and denying the rights of others...

Well considering its not actually a right, no matter how much you say it is.

It isn't just him that's saying it. It is the Supreme Court.

Sooooo...it IS a right, no matter how much you say it isn't.

 

[protectionist]

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with? Good to know.

Yes, they are for minorites you agree with. And those you don't agree with, are not protected. Always been that way, and still is. Like crazy people who get put in mental institutions. Criminal people who get put in jails. Unqualified people who don't get hired to jobs, etc.

 

[G.T.]

My children will be taught to treat gay people the same as they want to be treated themselves, and you cannot do shit about it bigot.

So we have two more socialist on the way to fuck up the world.

Gay marriage is.socialism?

Hey does being old come with mental.retardation for EVERYONE?

ILL begin my quest for the fountain of youth.

It's part of the Socialist Party Platform : Platform - SOCIALIST PARTY USA
Also, when the people of the respective states as per the 10th Amendment freely choose to protect marriage rights as between a man and a woman and view homosexuality as deviant behavior that is their prerogative. When the federal courts step in and usurp the will of the people that is an Orwellian abuse of power by the central authority.

You cant take away the rights of others, that is tyrrannical.

Gays being able to marry did nothing whatsoever to YOUR right to marry....so busy bodying about what other people do with their lives is your own form of tyranny. Fact

yet forcing people to bake cakes is somehow "freedom".

Asshole.

Umm no. When you enter public commerce you by proxy agree to those laws.

You =/= your business.

You personally can refuse to bake a gay giy a cake all youd like.

Its like gradeschool in here it feels like. Teaching these immature brained dopes the differences in laws and entities like they shouldnt already know. Wtfff?

 

[martybegan]

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

This is the same tired old bullshit Conservatives have been spouting via the 200 tears between slavery and equal rights for Black people and minorities.
"A little more time" is simply Conservatives way of saying 'not in your lifetime."

Considering I support gay marriage when legislatively enacted, you main consideration of my views is moot. In fact, I figured the 2nd question, that of recognition would have been the one to pass, forcing States not to issue SSM licenses, but to recognize ones issued by other states.

It's ironic and indicative of your lack of understanding of the situation that those 100 years (1877-1960's) of lack of equal rights was created by the very courts you now run to, using the same basic logic being used by your side.

No, what's ironic is that you are attempting to use the same "logic" that the WASPs have historically always tempted to use when restricting and denying the rights of others...

Well considering its not actually a right, no matter how much you say it is.

It isn't just him that's saying it. It is the Supreme Court.

Sooooo...it IS a right, no matter how much you say it isn't.

I's is so so sorry massa, now that them plantation folks at the SC have said something, I guesses we all have to just goes alongs with it.