bendog
Diamond Member
Not even deficit hawks are complaining about the bipartisan deal because "actual" infrastructure is a one time deal over time that causes greated econ efficiency .... so long as it's not straight out graft for shit that never gets used. I would say building interstate charging stations for cross country travel in cars no one has yet stepped up to buy, or high speed trains when shuttle flights don't require new bridges, is a boondoggle.
The harder question is when one or the other party contemplates a sustained lessening of revenue (tax cut) or spending program like permanent expansion of the child tax credit. Mcconnell/trump proved yet again that you can't just cut taxes and have no increased deficits, esp when you increase spending. Or expanding the child tax credit permanently.
Oddly, while I wasn't crazy about Obama expanding Medicaid and having govt approved HC plans, Obamacare did have a funding stream with taxes, until the gop repealed them without repealing obamacare.
The harder question is when one or the other party contemplates a sustained lessening of revenue (tax cut) or spending program like permanent expansion of the child tax credit. Mcconnell/trump proved yet again that you can't just cut taxes and have no increased deficits, esp when you increase spending. Or expanding the child tax credit permanently.
Oddly, while I wasn't crazy about Obama expanding Medicaid and having govt approved HC plans, Obamacare did have a funding stream with taxes, until the gop repealed them without repealing obamacare.