Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The anti trump lib news media always linked page to trump in every reportHe was a âformer Trump advisorâ by Trumpâs own assertion, but we know for a fact he had little to do with the campaign.be was a useful target because the lib news media would always refer to him as âformer trump advisorâWhy break the law for no reason? Your attempt at ascribing a motive makes zero sense.Raises a really good question why would the Obama administration break laws to spy on someone for political purposes if no one thought he had a chance at winning.They were over confidentSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
No one in lib la la land gave trump a chance of winning
Besides, Hillary was going to bury the wrongdoing.
Why break the law for no reason?
They broke the law to get dirt on their opponent.
It would have been buried if she won. No risk.
She was the most qualified candidate ever.....how could she lose?
This theory defies all logic.
One, the dirt was never used. The application wasnât even approved until two weeks before the election. Carter Page was only tangentially involved in the campaign and had left well before the warrant was issued.
So the plan to get Trump was to file a FISA warrant on a tangential figure 2 weeks before the election? Seems like that doesnât quite make a lot of sense.
You have a bad memoryThe anti trump lib news media always linked page to trump in every reportHe was a âformer Trump advisorâ by Trumpâs own assertion, but we know for a fact he had little to do with the campaign.be was a useful target because the lib news media would always refer to him as âformer trump advisorâWhy break the law for no reason? Your attempt at ascribing a motive makes zero sense.Raises a really good question why would the Obama administration break laws to spy on someone for political purposes if no one thought he had a chance at winning.They were over confidentSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
No one in lib la la land gave trump a chance of winning
Besides, Hillary was going to bury the wrongdoing.
Why break the law for no reason?
They broke the law to get dirt on their opponent.
It would have been buried if she won. No risk.
She was the most qualified candidate ever.....how could she lose?
This theory defies all logic.
One, the dirt was never used. The application wasnât even approved until two weeks before the election. Carter Page was only tangentially involved in the campaign and had left well before the warrant was issued.
So the plan to get Trump was to file a FISA warrant on a tangential figure 2 weeks before the election? Seems like that doesnât quite make a lot of sense.
They did. Because Trump linked Page to himself. But the reality is he was tangential and unimportant. He was also an idiot, but thatâs besides the point.
So none of this story youâre telling us makes any sense.
You have a bad memoryThe anti trump lib news media always linked page to trump in every reportHe was a âformer Trump advisorâ by Trumpâs own assertion, but we know for a fact he had little to do with the campaign.be was a useful target because the lib news media would always refer to him as âformer trump advisorâWhy break the law for no reason? Your attempt at ascribing a motive makes zero sense.Raises a really good question why would the Obama administration break laws to spy on someone for political purposes if no one thought he had a chance at winning.They were over confidentSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
No one in lib la la land gave trump a chance of winning
Besides, Hillary was going to bury the wrongdoing.
Why break the law for no reason?
They broke the law to get dirt on their opponent.
It would have been buried if she won. No risk.
She was the most qualified candidate ever.....how could she lose?
This theory defies all logic.
One, the dirt was never used. The application wasnât even approved until two weeks before the election. Carter Page was only tangentially involved in the campaign and had left well before the warrant was issued.
So the plan to get Trump was to file a FISA warrant on a tangential figure 2 weeks before the election? Seems like that doesnât quite make a lot of sense.
They did. Because Trump linked Page to himself. But the reality is he was tangential and unimportant. He was also an idiot, but thatâs besides the point.
So none of this story youâre telling us makes any sense.
libs loved to link page to trump
Post and CNN are notoriously anti Trump.Link please. I disagree 100%. Critical does not equal envious. I am critical of that moron JoeB. I am not envious of him whatsoever.Anything to distract from covid. Trump has long been envious of Obama.Obamagate rants by the President and Rwinger media sound so desperate it makes them look stupid.
How long this will last is your guess.
Remember, the 2020 election will be a referendum on Trump.
Also, he will be running against Joe Biden. Remember?
"Vanity Fair reporter Gabriel Sherman, however, writes on Twitter that Trumpâs conspiratorial ramblings about Obama fall apart at the slightest scrutiny."
âSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
'The dumbest conspiracy of all time': Veteran reporter blows up Trump's crazed 'Obamagate' ramblings
President Donald Trump over the weekend launched a series of attacks on former President Barack Obama in an effort to cast him as the purported mastermind of a conspiracy to ensnare former national security adviser Mike Flynn into a perjury trap.Vanity Fair reporter Gabriel Sherman, however...www.rawstory.com
It's not a matter of being critical - it is more a matter of obsession and obsessively comparing himself and Obama even 3 yrs into his term.
It's a subjective claim - there is no way to quantify envy objectively, but it's behavior distinctly different than his predecessors.
This opinion piece concludes with:
Trump seems terrified that history will look more kindly on Obamaâs presidency than on his own.
Washington (CNN)He made up a story about President Barack Obama trying "11 times" to call Kim Jong Un. He expressed suspicion of Obama's post-presidency Netflix deal and book deal. He claimed he, "not Obama," captured ISIS prisoners.
The numbers prove it: Trump's Obama fixation is getting worse
He made up a story about President Barack Obama trying "11 times" to call Kim Jong Un. He expressed suspicion of Obama's post-presidency Netflix deal and book deal. He claimed he, "not Obama," captured ISIS prisoners.www.cnn.com
President Donald Trump mentioned his predecessor's name 10 times in one Cabinet meeting two weeks ago. All 10 were unprompted.
Trump has had a years-long fixation with Obama that predates his presidential campaign. But it has appeared to intensify in recent months, at least judging by the frequency of his public disparagement.
October capped a five-month stretch in which Trump talked or tweeted about Obama far more than he did at any other point in his presidency.
Trump used Obama's name 106 times in June, the most of any month of his presidency; 80 times in October, his third-highest monthly total; 68 times in July, his fourth-highest monthly total; 61 times in August, his fifth-highest monthly total; and 51 times in September, his ninth-highest monthly total.
Over the five-month period, Trump mentioned Obama an average of 2.4 times per day. If you add in his 69 mentions of the "previous administration" or "last administration," it was 2.8 times per day.
I disagree with your opinion. We often conflate dislike with envy. I don't envy the Leftists on this site. I do dislike them.
We can disagree, it's based on opinions anyway. But I think there is clearly an obsession there.
In lib la la land page will always be a trump assocateYou have a bad memoryThe anti trump lib news media always linked page to trump in every reportHe was a âformer Trump advisorâ by Trumpâs own assertion, but we know for a fact he had little to do with the campaign.be was a useful target because the lib news media would always refer to him as âformer trump advisorâWhy break the law for no reason? Your attempt at ascribing a motive makes zero sense.Raises a really good question why would the Obama administration break laws to spy on someone for political purposes if no one thought he had a chance at winning.They were over confidentSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
No one in lib la la land gave trump a chance of winning
Besides, Hillary was going to bury the wrongdoing.
Why break the law for no reason?
They broke the law to get dirt on their opponent.
It would have been buried if she won. No risk.
She was the most qualified candidate ever.....how could she lose?
This theory defies all logic.
One, the dirt was never used. The application wasnât even approved until two weeks before the election. Carter Page was only tangentially involved in the campaign and had left well before the warrant was issued.
So the plan to get Trump was to file a FISA warrant on a tangential figure 2 weeks before the election? Seems like that doesnât quite make a lot of sense.
They did. Because Trump linked Page to himself. But the reality is he was tangential and unimportant. He was also an idiot, but thatâs besides the point.
So none of this story youâre telling us makes any sense.
libs loved to link page to trump
Youâre not addressing anything of substance.
The application was approved late October.
No information from the surveillance was ever released.
Carter Page had ended contact with the campaign.
This was the plot by the FBI to swing the election? Thatâs not going to fool anyone but the very gullible.
I take it you canât defend this little story so youâre just going to play dumb?In lib la la land page will always be a trump assocateYou have a bad memoryThe anti trump lib news media always linked page to trump in every reportHe was a âformer Trump advisorâ by Trumpâs own assertion, but we know for a fact he had little to do with the campaign.be was a useful target because the lib news media would always refer to him as âformer trump advisorâWhy break the law for no reason? Your attempt at ascribing a motive makes zero sense.Raises a really good question why would the Obama administration break laws to spy on someone for political purposes if no one thought he had a chance at winning.They were over confidentSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
No one in lib la la land gave trump a chance of winning
Besides, Hillary was going to bury the wrongdoing.
Why break the law for no reason?
They broke the law to get dirt on their opponent.
It would have been buried if she won. No risk.
She was the most qualified candidate ever.....how could she lose?
This theory defies all logic.
One, the dirt was never used. The application wasnât even approved until two weeks before the election. Carter Page was only tangentially involved in the campaign and had left well before the warrant was issued.
So the plan to get Trump was to file a FISA warrant on a tangential figure 2 weeks before the election? Seems like that doesnât quite make a lot of sense.
They did. Because Trump linked Page to himself. But the reality is he was tangential and unimportant. He was also an idiot, but thatâs besides the point.
So none of this story youâre telling us makes any sense.
libs loved to link page to trump
Youâre not addressing anything of substance.
The application was approved late October.
No information from the surveillance was ever released.
Carter Page had ended contact with the campaign.
This was the plot by the FBI to swing the election? Thatâs not going to fool anyone but the very gullible.
Why break the law for no reason? Your attempt at ascribing a motive makes zero sense.Raises a really good question why would the Obama administration break laws to spy on someone for political purposes if no one thought he had a chance at winning.They were over confidentSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
No one in lib la la land gave trump a chance of winning
Besides, Hillary was going to bury the wrongdoing.
Why break the law for no reason?
They broke the law to get dirt on their opponent.
It would have been buried if she won. No risk.
She was the most qualified candidate ever.....how could she lose?
This theory defies all logic.
One, the dirt was never used. The application wasnât even approved until two weeks before the election. Carter Page was only tangentially involved in the campaign and had left well before the warrant was issued.
Trumpâs campaign was literally meeting with Russians trying to give them dirt on Clinton to help his campaign.Why break the law for no reason? Your attempt at ascribing a motive makes zero sense.Raises a really good question why would the Obama administration break laws to spy on someone for political purposes if no one thought he had a chance at winning.They were over confidentSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
No one in lib la la land gave trump a chance of winning
Besides, Hillary was going to bury the wrongdoing.
Why break the law for no reason?
They broke the law to get dirt on their opponent.
It would have been buried if she won. No risk.
She was the most qualified candidate ever.....how could she lose?
This theory defies all logic.
One, the dirt was never used. The application wasnât even approved until two weeks before the election. Carter Page was only tangentially involved in the campaign and had left well before the warrant was issued.
One, the dirt was never used.
Probably because they didn't find anything that would help.
Trumpâs campaign was literally meeting with Russians trying to give them dirt on Clinton to help his campaign.
Such information coming out during the election would have been very bad. Hell, they tried to cover it up after it was being reported.Trumpâs campaign was literally meeting with Russians trying to give them dirt on Clinton to help his campaign.
So you're not allowed to get dirt on an opponent....if it comes from a foreigner?
Such information coming out during the election would have been very bad. Hell, they tried to cover it up after it was being reported.Trumpâs campaign was literally meeting with Russians trying to give them dirt on Clinton to help his campaign.
So you're not allowed to get dirt on an opponent....if it comes from a foreigner?
Your question is irrelevant to the discussion and a distraction.Such information coming out during the election would have been very bad. Hell, they tried to cover it up after it was being reported.Trumpâs campaign was literally meeting with Russians trying to give them dirt on Clinton to help his campaign.
So you're not allowed to get dirt on an opponent....if it comes from a foreigner?
Such information coming out during the election would have been very bad.
That doesn't answer my question.....
So you're not allowed to get dirt on an opponent....if it comes from a foreigner?
What story?I take it you canât defend this little story so youâre just going to play dumb?In lib la la land page will always be a trump assocateYou have a bad memoryThe anti trump lib news media always linked page to trump in every reportHe was a âformer Trump advisorâ by Trumpâs own assertion, but we know for a fact he had little to do with the campaign.be was a useful target because the lib news media would always refer to him as âformer trump advisorâWhy break the law for no reason? Your attempt at ascribing a motive makes zero sense.Raises a really good question why would the Obama administration break laws to spy on someone for political purposes if no one thought he had a chance at winning.They were over confidentSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
No one in lib la la land gave trump a chance of winning
Besides, Hillary was going to bury the wrongdoing.
Why break the law for no reason?
They broke the law to get dirt on their opponent.
It would have been buried if she won. No risk.
She was the most qualified candidate ever.....how could she lose?
This theory defies all logic.
One, the dirt was never used. The application wasnât even approved until two weeks before the election. Carter Page was only tangentially involved in the campaign and had left well before the warrant was issued.
So the plan to get Trump was to file a FISA warrant on a tangential figure 2 weeks before the election? Seems like that doesnât quite make a lot of sense.
They did. Because Trump linked Page to himself. But the reality is he was tangential and unimportant. He was also an idiot, but thatâs besides the point.
So none of this story youâre telling us makes any sense.
libs loved to link page to trump
Youâre not addressing anything of substance.
The application was approved late October.
No information from the surveillance was ever released.
Carter Page had ended contact with the campaign.
This was the plot by the FBI to swing the election? Thatâs not going to fool anyone but the very gullible.
The lala land is when people say the FBI was trying to swing the election to Clinton.
HardlyTrumpâs campaign was literally meeting with Russians trying to give them dirt on Clinton to help his campaign.Why break the law for no reason? Your attempt at ascribing a motive makes zero sense.Raises a really good question why would the Obama administration break laws to spy on someone for political purposes if no one thought he had a chance at winning.They were over confidentSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
No one in lib la la land gave trump a chance of winning
Besides, Hillary was going to bury the wrongdoing.
Why break the law for no reason?
They broke the law to get dirt on their opponent.
It would have been buried if she won. No risk.
She was the most qualified candidate ever.....how could she lose?
This theory defies all logic.
One, the dirt was never used. The application wasnât even approved until two weeks before the election. Carter Page was only tangentially involved in the campaign and had left well before the warrant was issued.
One, the dirt was never used.
Probably because they didn't find anything that would help.
You think that wasnât potentially harmful information?
Your question is irrelevant to the discussion and a distraction.Such information coming out during the election would have been very bad. Hell, they tried to cover it up after it was being reported.Trumpâs campaign was literally meeting with Russians trying to give them dirt on Clinton to help his campaign.
So you're not allowed to get dirt on an opponent....if it comes from a foreigner?
Such information coming out during the election would have been very bad.
That doesn't answer my question.....
So you're not allowed to get dirt on an opponent....if it comes from a foreigner?
The claim is that surveillance was intended to swing the election to Clinton when:
1. Nothing was released from the surveillance
2. Page was a tangential figure who had left the campaign
3. The warrant was issued very shortly before the election.
Your point was to rebut #1, stating there was no dirty to reveal, but thatâs obviously not the case.
HardlyTrumpâs campaign was literally meeting with Russians trying to give them dirt on Clinton to help his campaign.Why break the law for no reason? Your attempt at ascribing a motive makes zero sense.Raises a really good question why would the Obama administration break laws to spy on someone for political purposes if no one thought he had a chance at winning.They were over confidentSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
No one in lib la la land gave trump a chance of winning
Besides, Hillary was going to bury the wrongdoing.
Why break the law for no reason?
They broke the law to get dirt on their opponent.
It would have been buried if she won. No risk.
She was the most qualified candidate ever.....how could she lose?
This theory defies all logic.
One, the dirt was never used. The application wasnât even approved until two weeks before the election. Carter Page was only tangentially involved in the campaign and had left well before the warrant was issued.
One, the dirt was never used.
Probably because they didn't find anything that would help.
You think that wasnât potentially harmful information?
it was the other way around
the dems were the ones conspiring with russia
The warrant against Carter Page was obtained on October 21st. Supposedly we are supposed to believe that was intended to affect the outcome of the election just two weeks later.Your question is irrelevant to the discussion and a distraction.Such information coming out during the election would have been very bad. Hell, they tried to cover it up after it was being reported.Trumpâs campaign was literally meeting with Russians trying to give them dirt on Clinton to help his campaign.
So you're not allowed to get dirt on an opponent....if it comes from a foreigner?
Such information coming out during the election would have been very bad.
That doesn't answer my question.....
So you're not allowed to get dirt on an opponent....if it comes from a foreigner?
The claim is that surveillance was intended to swing the election to Clinton when:
1. Nothing was released from the surveillance
2. Page was a tangential figure who had left the campaign
3. The warrant was issued very shortly before the election.
Your point was to rebut #1, stating there was no dirty to reveal, but thatâs obviously not the case.
Your question is irrelevant to the discussion and a distraction.
Is it legal to get dirt on an opponent from an American?
Is it legal to get dirt on an opponent from a foreigner?
Why are you afraid to answer?
The claim is that surveillance was intended to swing the election to Clinton when:
If it wasn't to help Clinton, what was the purpose?
The warrant was issued very shortly before the election.
Which particular warrant?
Why would that be? Obama's hot wife?Anything to distract from covid. Trump has long been envious of Obama.Obamagate rants by the President and Rwinger media sound so desperate it makes them look stupid.
How long this will last is your guess.
Remember, the 2020 election will be a referendum on Trump.
Also, he will be running against Joe Biden. Remember?
"Vanity Fair reporter Gabriel Sherman, however, writes on Twitter that Trumpâs conspiratorial ramblings about Obama fall apart at the slightest scrutiny."
âSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
'The dumbest conspiracy of all time': Veteran reporter blows up Trump's crazed 'Obamagate' ramblings
President Donald Trump over the weekend launched a series of attacks on former President Barack Obama in an effort to cast him as the purported mastermind of a conspiracy to ensnare former national security adviser Mike Flynn into a perjury trap.Vanity Fair reporter Gabriel Sherman, however...
Donald Trump is not Chewbacca.
You have 6 months left to enjoy. Obama must have hurts Dorky Trump ego pumping 126 tweets on Motherâs Day.With the democrats everything is baseless except their base.âSerious question for Trumpers: why would Obama âSPYâ on Trump campaign but not do anything with the info?â he asks rhetorically. âPut another way, why would Obama WH go to extreme lengths to break the law but not help Hillary win? Thatâs the dumbest conspiracy of all time.â
First, we don;t know yet whether he did or didn't do anything with the information and, second, it's entirely possible that, despite whatever information they had, it was simply not possible for Clinton to beat Trump.
You assume that, if he had information, that it's obvious he did nothing with it because Clinton lost. That's a baseless conclusion...
