Peter Strzok public testimony: 10:00 am ET, Thursday, July 12, 2018

[busybee01]

No, they didn't. He's entitled to his personal views. There's no evidence his personal views affected his work. None. The IG investigation proved that.

You live in an alternative universe Shitting Bull. He's a partisan hack....like you.

You are the partisan hack. He also recommended re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails.

Says an annoying partisan hack

Sit down and cease bothering me

What annoys you is that I am non-partisan and independent voters have the same view.

Sit down and shut up and quite lying and there will be no need for correction.

Oh bullshit ya goddamn liar. Nobody on this forum believes that horseshit

You are the lying asshole. Trump supporters are nothing but liars.

 

[Lakhota]

As Strzok has clearly stated - bias and personal political beliefs are not the same thing. I totally agree!

 

[busybee01]

You are the partisan hack. He also recommended re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails.

Says an annoying partisan hack

Sit down and cease bothering me

What annoys you is that I am non-partisan and independent voters have the same view.

Sit down and shut up and quite lying and there will be no need for correction.

Oh bullshit ya goddamn liar. Nobody on this forum believes that horseshit

Because you are a bunch of Trump pigs. The truth to you is like a cross to a vampire. You recoil in fear.

That would be idiot Democrats who believe conspiracy theories are legitimate public policy.

You are describing idiot Trump Republicans. You are the ones who believe in crazy conspiracy theories.

 

[westwall]

If Strzok lost his credibility for cheating on his wife... then what does this Representative think about Trump who has cheated on multiple wives?

Trump wasn't a law enforcement officer who's supposed to follow the law. Strzok's lying to his wife calls into question anything he claims under oath. Comey is toast. he provably lied under oath, so from now on he is no longer a reliable witness. He will never be called to testify before a Court (other than in his own defense) ever again. This testimony has now shown strzok is likewise a liar, and thus the grounds have been laid for his ultimate prosecution.

It takes a long time to peel away the layers of the onion.

If cheating on your wife is lying that affects someone's "credibility" it doesn't matter if they are a law enforcement officer or not. You can't say Strzok is a liar with no credibility for cheating on his wife, and then say Trump isn't the same when he cheated on MULTIPLE wives.

In a Court of law you most certainly can. And it is DONE on a regular basis.

 

[Rambunctious]

The asswipe is guilty as hell...no amount of protection from the dems today will save little Peter.....he is going down....for sedition and so will Page...

 

[Lakhota]

The asswipe is guilty as hell...no amount of protection from the dems today will save little Peter.....he is going down....for sedition and so will Page...

What, for having "personal opinions"? The IG cleared him of bias.

 

[Lewdog]

If Strzok lost his credibility for cheating on his wife... then what does this Representative think about Trump who has cheated on multiple wives?

Trump wasn't a law enforcement officer who's supposed to follow the law. Strzok's lying to his wife calls into question anything he claims under oath. Comey is toast. he provably lied under oath, so from now on he is no longer a reliable witness. He will never be called to testify before a Court (other than in his own defense) ever again. This testimony has now shown strzok is likewise a liar, and thus the grounds have been laid for his ultimate prosecution.

It takes a long time to peel away the layers of the onion.

If cheating on your wife is lying that affects someone's "credibility" it doesn't matter if they are a law enforcement officer or not. You can't say Strzok is a liar with no credibility for cheating on his wife, and then say Trump isn't the same when he cheated on MULTIPLE wives.

In a Court of law you most certainly can. And it is DONE on a regular basis.

No, in a court of law the defendants counsel would would object based on relevance, and the judge would make a decision on that. Strzok cheating on his wife doesn't mean he can not do his job.

The fact you think that Strzok cheating on his wife is different than Trump cheating on multiple wives... or however many of those in Congress taking part in this hearing that have cheated on their wives, is just ridiculous and biased.

 

[busybee01]

No, they didn't. He's entitled to his personal views. There's no evidence his personal views affected his work. None. The IG investigation proved that.

You live in an alternative universe Shitting Bull. He's a partisan hack....like you.

You are the partisan hack. He also recommended re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails.

Says an annoying partisan hack

Sit down and cease bothering me

What annoys you is that I am non-partisan and independent voters have the same view.

No, only the worst of the worst Democrat hacks agree with you.

The dipshit was using a fucking government issued phone for personal text messages on the job. That ALONE would have gotten someone fired in a structured work environment. That ALONE proves that the FBI's leadership is a fucking joke.

The traitors who dare to call themselves an American political party have absolutely NOTHING to applaud from this pathetic fraud.

So you say. The fact is that you are allowed to use government accounts for personal things.

Trump is the pathetic fraud. His campaign attempted on at least 1 occasion to conspire with a Russian woman to get dirt on Clinton.

 

[busybee01]

Holy shit... this Chairman is a joke.

People ask him what rules he keeps referencing... and all he can say is, "Cause I said so!"

He's giving Republicans extended time, and then tells Strzok he gets a short time to answer and tells the Democrats their time is up and they have to move on.

I'm not taking sides on this, but this is obviously a farce of a hearing. I've never seen something to biased in my life.

Because this asshole is attempting to hide behind the FBI like they are above Congress.

Because Democrats have no intention to ask this asshole a goddamn thing.

The Congress is not entitled to evidence in a active investigation. Especially when the Republican goal is to leak it to Trump's lawyers.

 

[Rambunctious]

The asswipe is guilty as hell...no amount of protection from the dems today will save little Peter.....he is going down....for sedition and so will Page...

What, for having "personal opinions"? The IG cleared him of bias.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

 

[busybee01]

Louie Gohmert just laid into him.

That is like being called ugly by something ugly/ Gohmert is a bad joke whose brains are in his ass.

 

[westwall]

If Strzok lost his credibility for cheating on his wife... then what does this Representative think about Trump who has cheated on multiple wives?

Trump wasn't a law enforcement officer who's supposed to follow the law. Strzok's lying to his wife calls into question anything he claims under oath. Comey is toast. he provably lied under oath, so from now on he is no longer a reliable witness. He will never be called to testify before a Court (other than in his own defense) ever again. This testimony has now shown strzok is likewise a liar, and thus the grounds have been laid for his ultimate prosecution.

It takes a long time to peel away the layers of the onion.

If cheating on your wife is lying that affects someone's "credibility" it doesn't matter if they are a law enforcement officer or not. You can't say Strzok is a liar with no credibility for cheating on his wife, and then say Trump isn't the same when he cheated on MULTIPLE wives.

In a Court of law you most certainly can. And it is DONE on a regular basis.

No, in a court of law the defendants counsel would would object based on relevance, and the judge would make a decision on that. Strzok cheating on his wife doesn't mean he can not do his job.

The fact you think that Strzok cheating on his wife is different than Trump cheating on multiple wives... or however many of those in Congress taking part in this hearing that have cheated on their wives, is just ridiculous and biased.

And the judge would over rule because the simple Prosecutors retort is "your Honor, we know he is a liar, we are trying to determine how big a liar he is".

Judge "Overruled".

 

[Rambunctious]

That is like being called ugly by something ugly/ Gohmert is a bad joke whose brains are in his ass.

Why because he nails libs to the wall?

 

[westwall]

Holy shit... this Chairman is a joke.

People ask him what rules he keeps referencing... and all he can say is, "Cause I said so!"

He's giving Republicans extended time, and then tells Strzok he gets a short time to answer and tells the Democrats their time is up and they have to move on.

I'm not taking sides on this, but this is obviously a farce of a hearing. I've never seen something to biased in my life.

Because this asshole is attempting to hide behind the FBI like they are above Congress.

Because Democrats have no intention to ask this asshole a goddamn thing.

The Congress is not entitled to evidence in a active investigation. Especially when the Republican goal is to leak it to Trump's lawyers.

LOL! why do you think these asshats want to release the transcripts before page testifies? So SHE CAN SEE THE QUESTIONS! What's good for the goose is good for the gander!

 

[Lewdog]

If Strzok lost his credibility for cheating on his wife... then what does this Representative think about Trump who has cheated on multiple wives?

Trump wasn't a law enforcement officer who's supposed to follow the law. Strzok's lying to his wife calls into question anything he claims under oath. Comey is toast. he provably lied under oath, so from now on he is no longer a reliable witness. He will never be called to testify before a Court (other than in his own defense) ever again. This testimony has now shown strzok is likewise a liar, and thus the grounds have been laid for his ultimate prosecution.

It takes a long time to peel away the layers of the onion.

If cheating on your wife is lying that affects someone's "credibility" it doesn't matter if they are a law enforcement officer or not. You can't say Strzok is a liar with no credibility for cheating on his wife, and then say Trump isn't the same when he cheated on MULTIPLE wives.

In a Court of law you most certainly can. And it is DONE on a regular basis.

No, in a court of law the defendants counsel would would object based on relevance, and the judge would make a decision on that. Strzok cheating on his wife doesn't mean he can not do his job.

The fact you think that Strzok cheating on his wife is different than Trump cheating on multiple wives... or however many of those in Congress taking part in this hearing that have cheated on their wives, is just ridiculous and biased.

And the judge would over rule because the simple Prosecutors retort is "your Honor, we know he is a liar, we are trying to determine how big a liar he is".

Judge "Overruled".

Wrong... especially when the IG already said he could find no evidence of a bias in his work.

You can keep trying as much as possible to say this, but you can't have it both ways. If cheating on your wife makes you a liar and lose credibility, that includes Trump and any Congressman or other person that has. Fact is, LOTS of people cheat on their significant others and that doesn't mean they can't tell the truth.

 

[Rambunctious]

Jordan is up here comes the hammer little Peter.....

 

[Lewdog]

Holy shit... this Chairman is a joke.

People ask him what rules he keeps referencing... and all he can say is, "Cause I said so!"

He's giving Republicans extended time, and then tells Strzok he gets a short time to answer and tells the Democrats their time is up and they have to move on.

I'm not taking sides on this, but this is obviously a farce of a hearing. I've never seen something to biased in my life.

Because this asshole is attempting to hide behind the FBI like they are above Congress.

Because Democrats have no intention to ask this asshole a goddamn thing.

The Congress is not entitled to evidence in a active investigation. Especially when the Republican goal is to leak it to Trump's lawyers.

LOL! why do you think these asshats want to release the transcripts before page testifies? So SHE CAN SEE THE QUESTIONS! What's good for the goose is good for the gander!

No, they want to release the entire transcript because Republicans are LEAKING parts of it out of context in order to try and sway the public.

 

[westwall]

Holy shit... this Chairman is a joke.

People ask him what rules he keeps referencing... and all he can say is, "Cause I said so!"

He's giving Republicans extended time, and then tells Strzok he gets a short time to answer and tells the Democrats their time is up and they have to move on.

I'm not taking sides on this, but this is obviously a farce of a hearing. I've never seen something to biased in my life.

Because this asshole is attempting to hide behind the FBI like they are above Congress.

Because Democrats have no intention to ask this asshole a goddamn thing.

The Congress is not entitled to evidence in a active investigation. Especially when the Republican goal is to leak it to Trump's lawyers.

LOL! why do you think these asshats want to release the transcripts before page testifies? So SHE CAN SEE THE QUESTIONS! What's good for the goose is good for the gander!

No, they want to release the entire transcript because Republicans are LEAKING parts of it out of context in order to try and sway the public.

Nice try, but completely false.

 

[busybee01]

If Strzok lost his credibility for cheating on his wife... then what does this Representative think about Trump who has cheated on multiple wives?

Trump wasn't a law enforcement officer who's supposed to follow the law. Strzok's lying to his wife calls into question anything he claims under oath. Comey is toast. he provably lied under oath, so from now on he is no longer a reliable witness. He will never be called to testify before a Court (other than in his own defense) ever again. This testimony has now shown strzok is likewise a liar, and thus the grounds have been laid for his ultimate prosecution.

It takes a long time to peel away the layers of the onion.

That is so stupid. He was not under oath to his wife. Whether he lied to her or not has nothing to do with anything. The evidence has shown nothing except in your weak mind what you want it to say.

When you peel away the onion, you get a rotten Donald Trump.

 

[westwall]

Trump wasn't a law enforcement officer who's supposed to follow the law. Strzok's lying to his wife calls into question anything he claims under oath. Comey is toast. he provably lied under oath, so from now on he is no longer a reliable witness. He will never be called to testify before a Court (other than in his own defense) ever again. This testimony has now shown strzok is likewise a liar, and thus the grounds have been laid for his ultimate prosecution.

It takes a long time to peel away the layers of the onion.

If cheating on your wife is lying that affects someone's "credibility" it doesn't matter if they are a law enforcement officer or not. You can't say Strzok is a liar with no credibility for cheating on his wife, and then say Trump isn't the same when he cheated on MULTIPLE wives.

In a Court of law you most certainly can. And it is DONE on a regular basis.

No, in a court of law the defendants counsel would would object based on relevance, and the judge would make a decision on that. Strzok cheating on his wife doesn't mean he can not do his job.

The fact you think that Strzok cheating on his wife is different than Trump cheating on multiple wives... or however many of those in Congress taking part in this hearing that have cheated on their wives, is just ridiculous and biased.

And the judge would over rule because the simple Prosecutors retort is "your Honor, we know he is a liar, we are trying to determine how big a liar he is".

Judge "Overruled".

Wrong... especially when the IG already said he could find no evidence of a bias in his work.

You can keep trying as much as possible to say this, but you can't have it both ways. If cheating on your wife makes you a liar and lose credibility, that includes Trump and any Congressman or other person that has. Fact is, LOTS of people cheat on their significant others and that doesn't mean they can't tell the truth.

The IG said no such thing when he was testifying. You should watch his testimony more closely.