not true. you are being dumb and disingenuous. The Comey testimony even laid out how what people wanted Clinton charged with had never been used before in any similar circumstances.Indeed they did. Which is about as clear a case of bias as you could get. MANY people have gone to prison for violations far less than what she did. That's the point.
Why you lie like you do is interesting,.
No, comey ( the now proven purjeror) is very clear that she broke the law, he then gave her a pass. That's all he did. Our buddy strzok here is the person responsible for altering the hilary investigation result from Gross Negligence to Extremely Careless. Once again, a clear case of bias. Like I said, she did far more illegal activity, and suffered no consequences for it, than any other person who has EVER been under investigation for like activity.
That is a fact. And it is not arguable.