Philly execution attempt in the name of Islam

[Votto]

And they just arrested an Iraqi "refugee" in Texas for plotting to assist ISIS.
Barry's terrorist importation plan is about to get shut down.

Not to worry, he will get sent to club Gitmo where Obama will promptly release him.

 

[easyt65]

Philly Mayor: Islamist Cop Shooter ‘Does Not Represent’ Islam

So the guy who declares he did this for Islam is not a representative of Islam...
Neither was the Pakistani who vowed allegiance to ISIS and killed 14 in California
Neither was the Muslims who killed two military members in Tn
Neither was the 2 brothers who killed and maimed Americans in Boston...
Neither was the guys on 9/11/01...or 9/11/12...or who attacked Paris...


Islam is such a peaceful, tolerant religion....

 

[dani67]

 

[dani67]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Philly Mayor: Islamist Cop Shooter ‘Does Not Represent’ Islam

So the guy who declares he did this for Islam is not a representative of Islam...
Neither was the Pakistani who vowed allegiance to ISIS and killed 14 in California
Neither was the Muslims who killed two military members in Tn
Neither was the 2 brothers who killed and maimed Americans in Boston...
Neither was the guys on 9/11/01...or 9/11/12...or who attacked Paris...


Islam is such a peaceful, tolerant religion....

 

[dani67]

 

[Seawytch]

Fred Phelps protests funerals in the name of Christianity.

Does he represent Christianity?

 

[dani67]

 

[Tilly]

Lol.

5:32 out of context, and being a Muslim apologist, he probably knows it full well. In fact, 5:32 is the most ripped-out-of-context verse of the Qur'an in the West. Muslims (and even news organizations) often refer to this verse in order to show that Islam teaches murder is wrong and saving lives is the prescribed action for all people.

But this is absolutely not what this verse says. In fact, it says almost the exact opposite: that Muslims can kill those who are their enemies! The only way you can conclude as Nazam has concluded is to ignore the verses that immediately follow 5:32, as well as to ignore parts of the verse itself.

Here is 5:32 in its context, with all words included (emphasis mine):
On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.
Salient points:

1 - It explicitly states that this was a commandment to the Children of Israel, i.e. the Jews! This is not a commandment to all people, and it certainly should not be misused as if this is Allah's command to Muhammad's people.

2 - Even if this were a command to the Muslims, there's still an escape clause: "unless it be for murder or spreading mischief in the land." If someone is "spreading mischief", he can still be killed. Now let's think for a moment. The would-be Times Square bomber considers Americans to be spreading mischief in Palestine and around the world (practically all Muslims I know think this, even the ones who are American citizens). Accordingly, even if this verse were to apply to someone like Faisal Shahzad, he would still be justified in his slaughter.

As if this weren't obvious enough from the verse itself, the Qur'an further expounds this point in the very next verse. 5:33 says

The punishment of those who wage war against God and His Apostle, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter.

This verse is referring to the Muslims, not the Jews anymore, as we can tell in the shift from past tense to present tense. And here, the punishment for mischief is clearly prescribed: execution, crucifixion, mutilation, or at the least, exile. This is the command given to the Muslims. Quite clearly, it does not teach what the Muslims proclaim it teaches; in fact, it teaches almost the exact opposite.

It is undeniably clear that, in order to make Islam seem peaceful, Nazam and many other Muslims rip this verse out of its context, take words out of the very verse itself, changing the entire message for something else. I wonder if they know they are guilty of Surah 5:13. In any case, we should not let ourselves (or anyone who might be interested) be deceived by the popular Muslim interpretation of these verses.

Answering Muslims: Quran 5:32, Nazam, and Neglecting Context

 

[2aguy]

Yeah…don't have time to find the link…the cop was ambushed and returned fire wounding the muslim terrorist.

See…..this is why the smarter mass shooters target gun free zones…when the victim can shoot back…they actually shoot back.

 

[deltex1]

Err...ahhhh

What's this?

The Quran's Verses of Violence

 

[bucs90]

Naw Naw naw.....see....what had happened was....this white cop was all like, oppressing black people and like...flashing his white privilege. And this BLACK ISIS terrorist took a gun and went all "pew pew pew! Stop oppressing us copper!"

So...see....it's the cops fault.

 

[Eaglewings]

Philly Mayor: Islamist Cop Shooter ‘Does Not Represent’ Islam

So the guy who declares he did this for Islam is not a representative of Islam...
Neither was the Pakistani who vowed allegiance to ISIS and killed 14 in California
Neither was the Muslims who killed two military members in Tn
Neither was the 2 brothers who killed and maimed Americans in Boston...
Neither was the guys on 9/11/01...or 9/11/12...or who attacked Paris...


Islam is such a peaceful, tolerant religion....

Fox news just reported that he is mentally ill , so who knows. Glad the cop is alive and recovering.

 

[bodecea]

Yeah…don't have time to find the link…the cop was ambushed and returned fire wounding the muslim terrorist.

See…..this is why the smarter mass shooters target gun free zones…when the victim can shoot back…they actually shoot back.

If a christian tries to kill a cop and claims they are a white supremist, are all christians to blame?

 

[American_Jihad]

Yeah…don't have time to find the link…the cop was ambushed and returned fire wounding the muslim terrorist.

See…..this is why the smarter mass shooters target gun free zones…when the victim can shoot back…they actually shoot back.

Islamic State follower ambushes Philadelphia police officer: officials

PHILADELPHIA - A gunman claiming to have pledged allegiance to Islamic State militants shot and seriously wounded a Philadelphia police officer in an ambush on his patrol car, the city's police commissioner said on Friday.

Edward Archer of Philadelphia approached Officer Jesse Hartnett, 33, shortly before midnight and fired 11 rounds, three of which hit the officer in his arm, authorities said. Police released still images from surveillance video that showed the gunman dressed in a long white robe walking toward the car and firing, eventually getting close enough to shoot directly through the window.

Hartnett chased Archer, who was arrested by responding officers and later confessed to the attack, saying he had carried it out "in the name of Islam," police officials told reporters.

"He has confessed to committing this cowardly act in the name of Islam," Ross told a press conference, adding that the 30-year-old assailant also referenced Islamic State militants.

Philadelphia Police Captain James Clark added, "He said he pledges his allegiance to Islamic State, he follows Allah and that was the reason he was called on to do this."

U.S. officials have been on high security alert following a series of Islamic State-linked attacks at home and abroad over the last few months.

In November, gunman and suicide bombers affiliated with Islamic State killed 130 people in a series of coordinated attacks in Paris. Last month a married couple fatally shot 14 people in San Bernardino, California, in an attack inspired by Islamic State militants.

Those concerns have led to calls by some Republican governors and presidential hopefuls to restrict the admission of Syrian refugees fleeing that country's long civil war.

...

Islamic State follower ambushes Philadelphia police officer: officials

 

[Eaglewings]

Yeah…don't have time to find the link…the cop was ambushed and returned fire wounding the muslim terrorist.

See…..this is why the smarter mass shooters target gun free zones…when the victim can shoot back…they actually shoot back.

Just saw on fox news that he is mentally ill, not a terrorist.

 

[Rozman]

I'm sure the Libs consider this a workplace related incident.
Criminal vs.Cop

 

[DarkFury]

Police: Gunman said he shot Philadelphia cop in Islam's name

 

[DarkFury]

Yeah…don't have time to find the link…the cop was ambushed and returned fire wounding the muslim terrorist.

See…..this is why the smarter mass shooters target gun free zones…when the victim can shoot back…they actually shoot back.

Just saw on fox news that he is mentally ill, not a terrorist.

The fact he is a democrat does NOT take away from his STATED reason.

 

[dani67]

Lol.

5:32 out of context, and being a Muslim apologist, he probably knows it full well. In fact, 5:32 is the most ripped-out-of-context verse of the Qur'an in the West. Muslims (and even news organizations) often refer to this verse in order to show that Islam teaches murder is wrong and saving lives is the prescribed action for all people.

But this is absolutely not what this verse says. In fact, it says almost the exact opposite: that Muslims can kill those who are their enemies! The only way you can conclude as Nazam has concluded is to ignore the verses that immediately follow 5:32, as well as to ignore parts of the verse itself.

Here is 5:32 in its context, with all words included (emphasis mine):
On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.
Salient points:

1 - It explicitly states that this was a commandment to the Children of Israel, i.e. the Jews! This is not a commandment to all people, and it certainly should not be misused as if this is Allah's command to Muhammad's people.

2 - Even if this were a command to the Muslims, there's still an escape clause: "unless it be for murder or spreading mischief in the land." If someone is "spreading mischief", he can still be killed. Now let's think for a moment. The would-be Times Square bomber considers Americans to be spreading mischief in Palestine and around the world (practically all Muslims I know think this, even the ones who are American citizens). Accordingly, even if this verse were to apply to someone like Faisal Shahzad, he would still be justified in his slaughter.

As if this weren't obvious enough from the verse itself, the Qur'an further expounds this point in the very next verse. 5:33 says

The punishment of those who wage war against God and His Apostle, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter.

This verse is referring to the Muslims, not the Jews anymore, as we can tell in the shift from past tense to present tense. And here, the punishment for mischief is clearly prescribed: execution, crucifixion, mutilation, or at the least, exile. This is the command given to the Muslims. Quite clearly, it does not teach what the Muslims proclaim it teaches; in fact, it teaches almost the exact opposite.

It is undeniably clear that, in order to make Islam seem peaceful, Nazam and many other Muslims rip this verse out of its context, take words out of the very verse itself, changing the entire message for something else. I wonder if they know they are guilty of Surah 5:13. In any case, we should not let ourselves (or anyone who might be interested) be deceived by the popular Muslim interpretation of these verses.

Answering Muslims: Quran 5:32, Nazam, and Neglecting Context

what is your purpose?
most moslem believed that islam is peacefull.islam dont support killing people
and you are trying say to them : islam isnt peacefull.islam support killing christian.come on and kill me?
i have aunt.and she is very emotional..
when paris attack happened.when she watched news.she did cry for it.
are you trying say to her: dont cry.be happy.because islam love killing this people ? please hate me.?
what is your purpose?