PINO trump just pardoned kkk, alt right Arpaio

[busybee01]

It's incredible. Profiling is what we all do, we all look at situations and the facts and put them together and assess them in a fitting matter. It's too bad THAT those facts offend people, but you can't afford to overlook them because of fickle politics and sentiments.

So a county cop should enforce federal law he has no jurisdiction in?

Federal law covers his county, dickhead.

The Supreme Court laid out how much latitude local law enforcement has in enforcing immigration law. Arpaio violated those constraints. You clearly do not believe in people's constitutional rights.

No, he did not. That is what the criminal 0bama appointed judge made up.

Nothing was made up. You cannot ask someone for their papers based of their ethnicity. Their constitutional rights were violated. Even conservatives like Justin Amash agree.

 

[easyt65]

Those of us who are constitutional conservatives know that a majority cannot deprive people of their constitutional rights. Sheriffs are not above the law and should be held accountable when they violate people's constitutional rights.

Arpaio was punished. He was tried and convicted. It is well within Trump's legal and Constitutional Right to pardon him, which he did.

The Justice System worked, like it or not...unlike how Clinton, Obama, Hillary, Comey, Lynch, etc were never brought to justice as they should have been under this nation's judicial system.

 

[busybee01]

‘Arizona's largest newspaper issued a scathing rebuke of President Trump's decision to pardon former Maricopa Counter Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Friday, calling the action an "insult" and a "slap to the Latino community."

The Arizona Republic's editorial board argued that the pardoning of Arpaio is a sign that Trump is not backing down from his populist, tough-on-immigration stances.

The editorial calls Trump's Friday pardon of the controversial former sheriff an "insult" to the Latino community, as well as the legal community.

"The vast majority of Latinos in Arizona are not undocumented, yet they all fell under heightened scrutiny as Arpaio honed his image," the editorial reads.

"The pardon was a slap to those who worked through the judicial system to make Arpaio accountable, too. It robbed the people hurt by his policies of justice – even before a judge could mete out a sentence," the piece continued.’

Arizona's largest newspaper slams Arpaio pardon

True.

Hispanic Americans where subject to Arpaio’s bigotry and hate, their only ‘crime’ being Latino.

Oh oh oh! A liberal rag doesn't like Trump's pardon? that's unusual. Who would have seen that coming?

Anyone or thing that speaks the truth about Trump is a liberal. Kool-Aid drinkers like you don't have the ability to think for yourself. If Trump told you to drink poisoned Kool-Aid, you would do it without question.

 

[peach174]

It shows consistency, why would it be okay to pardon a Marc Rich a Scooter Libby and not Arpaio who's crime was much less?

Because he was a law enforcement official who violated the constitutional rights of American citizens. He believed he was above the Constitution and above the law.

BS, so Clinton pardoning a FBI's top ten most wanted list is okay but a sheriff that was in contempt of court is worse. It was okay for the leader of the country to lie under oath however a sheriff in contempt of court should serve time.

Your politics is showing.

Your politics is showing. This has nothing to do with Clinton. Your defense is Clinton did this and Obama did that. Just because they did it does not mean it is okay for Trump to do it.

Then work to change the law.

I tell them all that but they don't want the law changed because they want to do it when they are in power.

It's too hard to change the Constitution.

 

[peach174]

So a sheriff in Arizona tries to uphold federal laws and the left has a cow. Nothing new, pardon the guy and move on.

The left believes enforcing the laws approved by a majority vote is a crime against humanity.

Those of us who are constitutional conservatives know that a majority cannot deprive people of their constitutional rights. Sheriffs are not above the law and should be held accountable when they violate people's constitutional rights.

In order to have Constitutional rights ,you need to become a Citizen first.

 

[busybee01]

[Q


I don't know what the original justification for deciding that the sixth doesn't apply to "petty crimes" was. It seems pretty ridiculous to me, I was just pointing out the reality of the situation.

A petty crime is speeding and being subjected to a $100 fine or a $25 fine for not putting money into the parking meter, not something that is subject to spending months in jail. Our Founding Fathers did not want somebody sent to jail without being judged by a jury of peers, did they?

I can understand why the court would say that petty crimes can be settled outside of the jury system but that doesn't apply to Joe being railroaded by the Obama administration for doing his job and being subjected to jail time. The judge refused the request for a jury because of the fear that Joe would be found not guilty, not because of any justice approved petty crime expediency.

It is very clear that the Obama administration was trying to punish Joe for resisting their open borders immigration policy, which by the way, is illegal as hell since Congress is the one that sets the immigration laws.

It was the right thing for Trump to do to pardon Joe. It was wrong for the Obama administration to go after him when he was doing the right thing. His department was even deputized by the Federal government to act at immigration enforcers.

This deal is a great example of Obama's administration being scumbags.

The fact is that the federal government cannot empower anybody to violate a person's constitutional rights. You are the scumbag for supporting that.

 

[peach174]

It's incredible. Profiling is what we all do, we all look at situations and the facts and put them together and assess them in a fitting matter. It's too bad THAT those facts offend people, but you can't afford to overlook them because of fickle politics and sentiments.

So a county cop should enforce federal law he has no jurisdiction in?

Federal law covers his county, dickhead.

The Supreme Court laid out how much latitude local law enforcement has in enforcing immigration law. Arpaio violated those constraints. You clearly do not believe in people's constitutional rights.

No, he did not. That is what the criminal 0bama appointed judge made up.

Nothing was made up. You cannot ask someone for their papers based of their ethnicity. Their constitutional rights were violated. Even conservatives like Justin Amash agree.

What Constitutional rights.
They aren't legal citizens.

 

[busybee01]

So a sheriff in Arizona tries to uphold federal laws and the left has a cow. Nothing new, pardon the guy and move on.

The left believes enforcing the laws approved by a majority vote is a crime against humanity.

Those of us who are constitutional conservatives know that a majority cannot deprive people of their constitutional rights. Sheriffs are not above the law and should be held accountable when they violate people's constitutional rights.

In order to have Constitutional rights ,you need to become a Citizen first.

Arpaio harassed American citizens who are of Hispanic descent. He violated their rights.

We do confer rights on non-citizens as well. Even if a person is being extradited on a murder charge, they can fight the extradition and can have a hearing as well.

 

[busybee01]

‘"Regarding the Arpaio pardon, I would have preferred that the President honor the judicial process and let it take its course," Flake tweeted Friday night, in an acknowledgment of the political fallout of Trump's pardoning of Arpaio.

Arizona's senior senator, Republican John McCain, said in a statement on the pardon that "no one is above the law and the individuals entrusted with the privilege of being sworn law officers should always seek to be beyond reproach in their commitment to fairly enforcing the laws they swore to uphold."

"Mr. Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based on their perceived immigration status in violation of a judge's orders," McCain said. "The President has the authority to make this pardon, but doing so at this time undermines his claim for the respect of rule of law as Mr. Arpaio has shown no remorse for his actions."’

Trump makes a mess for Arizona GOP with Arpaio pardon - CNNPolitics

At least two Republicans get it.

You aren't helping your case by citing the two biggest Republican weasels in the Senate.

‘"Regarding the Arpaio pardon, I would have preferred that the President honor the judicial process and let it take its course," Flake tweeted Friday night, in an acknowledgment of the political fallout of Trump's pardoning of Arpaio.

Arizona's senior senator, Republican John McCain, said in a statement on the pardon that "no one is above the law and the individuals entrusted with the privilege of being sworn law officers should always seek to be beyond reproach in their commitment to fairly enforcing the laws they swore to uphold."

"Mr. Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based on their perceived immigration status in violation of a judge's orders," McCain said. "The President has the authority to make this pardon, but doing so at this time undermines his claim for the respect of rule of law as Mr. Arpaio has shown no remorse for his actions."’

Trump makes a mess for Arizona GOP with Arpaio pardon - CNNPolitics

At least two Republicans get it.

You aren't helping your case by citing the two biggest Republican weasels in the Senate.

The biggest Republican weasels in the Senate are Republicans who claim to be conservatives then support Trump. McCain won his Senate race easily while Trump narrowly won.

 

[peach174]

So a sheriff in Arizona tries to uphold federal laws and the left has a cow. Nothing new, pardon the guy and move on.

The left believes enforcing the laws approved by a majority vote is a crime against humanity.

Those of us who are constitutional conservatives know that a majority cannot deprive people of their constitutional rights. Sheriffs are not above the law and should be held accountable when they violate people's constitutional rights.

In order to have Constitutional rights ,you need to become a Citizen first.

Arpaio harassed American citizens who are of Hispanic descent. He violated their rights.

We do confer rights on non-citizens as well. Even if a person is being extradited on a murder charge, they can fight the extradition and can have a hearing as well.

Like I said, a 22 year witch hunt of bogas made up charges and there was no evidence or charges because he didn't harass American Citizens.

 

[busybee01]

Arpaio was found in "contempt of court" for refusing to stop arresting illegal aliens.

The stupid order was given by a filthy ass Obama appointed judge. Obama, the worst President this country ever had. A worthless piece of shit that wanted the illegals to flood in so they would vote Democrat. He call the assholes "Dreamers". He should have called them "The Nighmares".

Obama who had an open door policy to all the trespassing Beaners and who refused to carry out the laws established by Congress.

The villain here is Obama and that stupid judge who violated justice, the laws of Congress and the Constitution.

He was found in contempt for stopping Hispanics and asking for their papers. He violated their constitutional rights. The only filth that I see is you. You defame the name of Robert E Lee by using his image. Trash like you is why these attacks on Confederate statues is succeeding.

 

[easyt65]

Obama 'pardoned' Hillary, as seen by Comey and Lynch'r intervention to ensure Hillary was not indicted for the crimes she committed...

 

[Papageorgio]

‘"Regarding the Arpaio pardon, I would have preferred that the President honor the judicial process and let it take its course," Flake tweeted Friday night, in an acknowledgment of the political fallout of Trump's pardoning of Arpaio.

Arizona's senior senator, Republican John McCain, said in a statement on the pardon that "no one is above the law and the individuals entrusted with the privilege of being sworn law officers should always seek to be beyond reproach in their commitment to fairly enforcing the laws they swore to uphold."

"Mr. Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based on their perceived immigration status in violation of a judge's orders," McCain said. "The President has the authority to make this pardon, but doing so at this time undermines his claim for the respect of rule of law as Mr. Arpaio has shown no remorse for his actions."’

Trump makes a mess for Arizona GOP with Arpaio pardon - CNNPolitics

At least two Republicans get it.

You aren't helping your case by citing the two biggest Republican weasels in the Senate.

‘"Regarding the Arpaio pardon, I would have preferred that the President honor the judicial process and let it take its course," Flake tweeted Friday night, in an acknowledgment of the political fallout of Trump's pardoning of Arpaio.

Arizona's senior senator, Republican John McCain, said in a statement on the pardon that "no one is above the law and the individuals entrusted with the privilege of being sworn law officers should always seek to be beyond reproach in their commitment to fairly enforcing the laws they swore to uphold."

"Mr. Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based on their perceived immigration status in violation of a judge's orders," McCain said. "The President has the authority to make this pardon, but doing so at this time undermines his claim for the respect of rule of law as Mr. Arpaio has shown no remorse for his actions."’

Trump makes a mess for Arizona GOP with Arpaio pardon - CNNPolitics

At least two Republicans get it.

You aren't helping your case by citing the two biggest Republican weasels in the Senate.

The biggest Republican weasels in the Senate are Republicans who claim to be conservatives then support Trump. McCain won his Senate race easily while Trump narrowly won.

McCain is an imbecile, thanks to him and his CFR we were led down the path of Citizens United. And for what? To make it easier for incumbents to get re-elected.

 

[busybee01]

He was not authorized to violate people's rights.

...yet Obama did, just the same, by illegally spying on Americans, reporters, the media, the US Senate, and the USSC ... by becoming only the 2nd US President in US history to illegally use the IRS as a political weapon against Americans ... by illegally sharing and leaking protected personal classified information ... by illegally unmasking Americans.

Obama should be the one asking Trump for a 'pardon' right now.

We are not discussing Obama. Just because Obama does something does not make it okay. To put it in a language your infantile mind can understand, two wrongs do not make a right.

 

[busybee01]

So a sheriff in Arizona tries to uphold federal laws and the left has a cow. Nothing new, pardon the guy and move on.

The left believes enforcing the laws approved by a majority vote is a crime against humanity.

Those of us who are constitutional conservatives know that a majority cannot deprive people of their constitutional rights. Sheriffs are not above the law and should be held accountable when they violate people's constitutional rights.

In order to have Constitutional rights ,you need to become a Citizen first.

Arpaio harassed American citizens who are of Hispanic descent. He violated their rights.

We do confer rights on non-citizens as well. Even if a person is being extradited on a murder charge, they can fight the extradition and can have a hearing as well.

Like I said, a 22 year witch hunt of bogas made up charges and there was no evidence or charges because he didn't harass American Citizens.

He did harass American citizens. He denied them of their 4th amendment rights. Nazi Trump supporters like you don't give a damn about the rights of American citizens.

 

[busybee01]

‘"Regarding the Arpaio pardon, I would have preferred that the President honor the judicial process and let it take its course," Flake tweeted Friday night, in an acknowledgment of the political fallout of Trump's pardoning of Arpaio.

Arizona's senior senator, Republican John McCain, said in a statement on the pardon that "no one is above the law and the individuals entrusted with the privilege of being sworn law officers should always seek to be beyond reproach in their commitment to fairly enforcing the laws they swore to uphold."

"Mr. Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based on their perceived immigration status in violation of a judge's orders," McCain said. "The President has the authority to make this pardon, but doing so at this time undermines his claim for the respect of rule of law as Mr. Arpaio has shown no remorse for his actions."’

Trump makes a mess for Arizona GOP with Arpaio pardon - CNNPolitics

At least two Republicans get it.

You aren't helping your case by citing the two biggest Republican weasels in the Senate.

‘"Regarding the Arpaio pardon, I would have preferred that the President honor the judicial process and let it take its course," Flake tweeted Friday night, in an acknowledgment of the political fallout of Trump's pardoning of Arpaio.

Arizona's senior senator, Republican John McCain, said in a statement on the pardon that "no one is above the law and the individuals entrusted with the privilege of being sworn law officers should always seek to be beyond reproach in their commitment to fairly enforcing the laws they swore to uphold."

"Mr. Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based on their perceived immigration status in violation of a judge's orders," McCain said. "The President has the authority to make this pardon, but doing so at this time undermines his claim for the respect of rule of law as Mr. Arpaio has shown no remorse for his actions."’

Trump makes a mess for Arizona GOP with Arpaio pardon - CNNPolitics

At least two Republicans get it.

You aren't helping your case by citing the two biggest Republican weasels in the Senate.

The biggest Republican weasels in the Senate are Republicans who claim to be conservatives then support Trump. McCain won his Senate race easily while Trump narrowly won.

McCain is an imbecile, thanks to him and his CFR we were led down the path of Citizens United. And for what? To make it easier for incumbents to get re-elected.

McCain won his seat easily against what was thought to be a strong Democrat challenger. He's apparently smarter than Trump.

 

[easyt65]

We are not discussing Obama. Just because Obama does something does not make it okay. To put it in a language your infantile mind can understand, two wrongs do not make a right.

I am talking about Trump, and I never said 2 wrongs make a right. So what's your point?

Trump, again - despite snowflakes declaring otherwise - did not do anything wrong. He did not pardon terrorists and drug dealers who preyed upon Americans as Obama did. He legally exercised his right of 'pardon' to pardon a man who broke the law in how he PROTECTED Americans.

Thank you for demonstrating you are allergic to the hypocritical BS snowflakes are shoveling, though.

 

[easyt65]

‘"Regarding the Arpaio pardon, I would have preferred that the President honor the judicial process and let it take its course," Flake tweeted Friday night, in an acknowledgment of the political fallout of Trump's pardoning of Arpaio.

Arizona's senior senator, Republican John McCain, said in a statement on the pardon that "no one is above the law and the individuals entrusted with the privilege of being sworn law officers should always seek to be beyond reproach in their commitment to fairly enforcing the laws they swore to uphold."

"Mr. Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based on their perceived immigration status in violation of a judge's orders," McCain said. "The President has the authority to make this pardon, but doing so at this time undermines his claim for the respect of rule of law as Mr. Arpaio has shown no remorse for his actions."’

Trump makes a mess for Arizona GOP with Arpaio pardon - CNNPolitics

At least two Republicans get it.

You aren't helping your case by citing the two biggest Republican weasels in the Senate.

‘"Regarding the Arpaio pardon, I would have preferred that the President honor the judicial process and let it take its course," Flake tweeted Friday night, in an acknowledgment of the political fallout of Trump's pardoning of Arpaio.

Arizona's senior senator, Republican John McCain, said in a statement on the pardon that "no one is above the law and the individuals entrusted with the privilege of being sworn law officers should always seek to be beyond reproach in their commitment to fairly enforcing the laws they swore to uphold."

"Mr. Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based on their perceived immigration status in violation of a judge's orders," McCain said. "The President has the authority to make this pardon, but doing so at this time undermines his claim for the respect of rule of law as Mr. Arpaio has shown no remorse for his actions."’

Trump makes a mess for Arizona GOP with Arpaio pardon - CNNPolitics

At least two Republicans get it.

You aren't helping your case by citing the two biggest Republican weasels in the Senate.

The biggest Republican weasels in the Senate are Republicans who claim to be conservatives then support Trump. McCain won his Senate race easily while Trump narrowly won.

McCain is an imbecile, thanks to him and his CFR we were led down the path of Citizens United. And for what? To make it easier for incumbents to get re-elected.

McCain won his seat easily against what was thought to be a strong Democrat challenger. He's apparently smarter than Trump.

I did not realize he ran against Trump...

 

[Montrovant]

So a sheriff in Arizona tries to uphold federal laws and the left has a cow. Nothing new, pardon the guy and move on.

The left believes enforcing the laws approved by a majority vote is a crime against humanity.

Those of us who are constitutional conservatives know that a majority cannot deprive people of their constitutional rights. Sheriffs are not above the law and should be held accountable when they violate people's constitutional rights.

In order to have Constitutional rights ,you need to become a Citizen first.

The USSC has ruled that non-citizens have rights as persons under the constitution on numerous occasions. See Chew v Colding:

Such rights include those protected by the First and the Fifth Amendments and by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. None of these provisions acknowledges and distinction between citizens and resident aliens.

KWONG HAI CHEW v. COLDING | 344 U.S. 590 (1953) | Leagle.com

Wo v Hopkins:

The guarantees of protection contained in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution extend to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, without regard to differences of race, of color, or of nationality.

Yick Wo v. Hopkins

Zadvydas v Davis:

Once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the Due Process Clause applies to all persons within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent.

ZADVYDAS v. DAVIS

There are certainly constitutional protections that are specific to citizens, and even where non-citizens are concerned, there sometimes seems to be ambiguity from the USSC, but it is not true that constitutional protections only apply to citizens, according to our history and the rulings of the USSC.

 

[Synthaholic]

Since the President is the highest Law Enforcement Officer in the nation, if he says Arpaio is innocent of all charges, he is innocent. Case closed.

You're an idiot. POTUS is not the highest LEO in the nation - he isn't even an LEO. Jeff Sessions is the highest LEO in the nation. And he can't make someone innocent by declaring it, either.