Moonglow
Diamond Member
Yet they never went to court.Obviously so - it did for Kavanaugh.Does the burden of proof lessen with each new litigant?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet they never went to court.Obviously so - it did for Kavanaugh.Does the burden of proof lessen with each new litigant?
No, of course not. But if you dismiss the first "lady" with the reasoning that you used, you have to justify the dismissal of the second. If you want to say it's a false accusation of both, just say so.Does the burden of proof lessen with each new litigant?What about the second "lady"?If she can't prove the charges must be removed..A lawyer would argue that what you mentioned is a previous case and has little bearing on this one, that this case must be taken serious and the evidence provided and measured.They found out that the lady that accused him also accused a football player in 1999 and it turned out to be false.
You saying women should get 1 shot to go after a rapist?
In regards to Kavanaugh, Democrats declared themselves to BE the court - 'Judge', 'Jury', and 'Executioner' . Even after not getting the verdict that demanded / wanted they still have vowed to 'take him down'.Yet they never went to court.
No, their motivation was trying to keep the SC from being overladen with conservatives.During the Kavanaugh confirmation process, the Democrats did. The worst part about it was their motivation had nothing to do with Kavanaugh but their hate for TrumpYou can't just allege and accuse people of horrid things without proof.
Testimony is not proof ya dingbat lol.I agree....you know, like accusers testifying.You can't just allege and accuse people of horrid things without proof.
No, their motivation was trying to keep the SC from being overladen with conservatives.During the Kavanaugh confirmation process, the Democrats did. The worst part about it was their motivation had nothing to do with Kavanaugh but their hate for TrumpYou can't just allege and accuse people of horrid things without proof.
Actually i have seen quite a few that dont support socially assassinating someone over accusations.
What i have seen, miraculously, is the left defending him.
Anyone else, and accusations are enough to publically rape their children as punishment.
Sick fucks
Where's all the nasty slime about Fairfax's accusers, TN? Aren't these unfair women slandering a good man and destroying his family and his reputation for nothing but political motivation? Aren't they MENTAL? Hey, where is it, TN?Im alt right now? Lol for real?Dream on. I'll be goldanged if I'm going to let some alt righter get all high and mighty righteous about 'hypocrisy' when you guys are puking out the most despicable garbage in the world about Kavanaugh's accusers. I don't hear you saying a single naughty word about the two accusing Fairfax. Tell me how that's not politically motivated and JUST as hypocritical as trying to stall booting the guy out.Whatever what? Wouldnt it make you feel much better to say, "gah TN, you are right. My bad, sensei"whatever. Haven't you got WORK to do?Nobody goves a shit about name calling OL. Its the substance of the hypocrisy.You're doing it again. Just sayin
As i said, you had to dig deep to find SOMETHING to defend them with. Even if you are the only that thinks its relevant.
Names aren't actions. my gawd woman, there isnt even a comparison, commie.
A full body massage with happy ending and g-spot focus work should be his "punishment" and happy camper policy.Conservatives here are very excited about the prospect of Justin Fairfax being impeached. Not looking good for them right now:
Lawmaker backs off fast-track impeachment of Fairfax
Conservatives here are very excited about the prospect of Justin Fairfax being impeached. Not looking good for them right now:
Lawmaker backs off fast-track impeachment of Fairfax
Where's all the nasty slime about Fairfax's accusers, TN? Aren't these unfair women slandering a good man and destroying his family and his reputation for nothing but political motivation? Aren't they MENTAL? Hey, where is it, TN?Im alt right now? Lol for real?Dream on. I'll be goldanged if I'm going to let some alt righter get all high and mighty righteous about 'hypocrisy' when you guys are puking out the most despicable garbage in the world about Kavanaugh's accusers. I don't hear you saying a single naughty word about the two accusing Fairfax. Tell me how that's not politically motivated and JUST as hypocritical as trying to stall booting the guy out.Whatever what? Wouldnt it make you feel much better to say, "gah TN, you are right. My bad, sensei"whatever. Haven't you got WORK to do?Nobody goves a shit about name calling OL. Its the substance of the hypocrisy.
As i said, you had to dig deep to find SOMETHING to defend them with. Even if you are the only that thinks its relevant.
Names aren't actions. my gawd woman, there isnt even a comparison, commie.
You know I'm right.
But no, I wasn't specifically calling you an alt righter, but handsome is as handsome does, trash mouth.
‘You have to see it to believe it’: People are seeing things in Justin Fairfax’s campaign logo:The biggest thing I have noticed about the whole thing is that the left are just fine with anything that a person claiming to be a Dem does and will defend them against all comers no matter if it is just hearsay or verified facts. But let it be anything done by someone calling themselves a Republican and and it does not matter the charge they are out for blood.