Sherlock Holmes
Gold Member
- Jul 1, 2024
- 904
- 256
- 143
- Thread starter
- #41
It's logic nothing more, should an elected government seek to increase or decrease the risk of terrorism being inflicted upon its population? are you telling me your struggling with this one?That is the clearest example of victim-blaming I've seen lately.
No it doesn't. It removes the presumption that the causes of terrorism are completely outside the control of the state, I don't have that presumption.It makes the victim of terror attacks responsible for appeasing their attackers in order to prevent the attack, rather than holding the perpetrator accountable for their actions.
There you go, that's interpretation messing with your mind - I warned you!This is NOT a criticism of Israel or Israel's actions, but a slur to paint Israel as the only one responsible.
Last edited: