Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're getting funnier and more hysterical.I see creepy giggling psycho is still being creepy...cuz abortion and the abuse of women and girls is so funny and all....No, I would charge the monsters who cut them up, kill their babies and abuse them in jail. I don't believe in the death penalty, even for butchers.Like you give a rat's ass about women. You would charge them all with murder and lock them up, if not kill them.Idb is cackling mindlessly at the concept of abused women being lied to and forced into the stirrups, I see. You see the type of monsters support planned parenthood. They know what transpires and they glory in it.
This could be a good drinking game on a Friday.
The players each pick a word and everytime koshergrl mentions it that person has to drink.
I'll pick 'babykillers'...hell, I'll be drunk in no time!
'Butchers' would be another good one.
You're getting funnier and more hysterical.I see creepy giggling psycho is still being creepy...cuz abortion and the abuse of women and girls is so funny and all....No, I would charge the monsters who cut them up, kill their babies and abuse them in jail. I don't believe in the death penalty, even for butchers.Like you give a rat's ass about women. You would charge them all with murder and lock them up, if not kill them.Idb is cackling mindlessly at the concept of abused women being lied to and forced into the stirrups, I see. You see the type of monsters support planned parenthood. They know what transpires and they glory in it.
And I'm getting drunk thanks to your foam-flecked ranting.
That's six 'baby-killers', five 'butchers' and a 'harvesting' in the last two pages!
I'm going to fall over soon.
This could be a good drinking game on a Friday.
The players each pick a word and everytime koshergrl mentions it that person has to drink.
I'll pick 'babykillers'...hell, I'll be drunk in no time!
'Butchers' would be another good one.
You're okay with the abortionists conspiring with human traffickers to keep the girls profitable, then?
I'm sure you'll drink to just about anything.
True that!You're getting funnier and more hysterical.I see creepy giggling psycho is still being creepy...cuz abortion and the abuse of women and girls is so funny and all....No, I would charge the monsters who cut them up, kill their babies and abuse them in jail. I don't believe in the death penalty, even for butchers.Like you give a rat's ass about women. You would charge them all with murder and lock them up, if not kill them.Idb is cackling mindlessly at the concept of abused women being lied to and forced into the stirrups, I see. You see the type of monsters support planned parenthood. They know what transpires and they glory in it.
And I'm getting drunk thanks to your foam-flecked ranting.
That's six 'baby-killers', five 'butchers' and a 'harvesting' in the last two pages!
I'm going to fall over soon.
This could be a good drinking game on a Friday.
The players each pick a word and everytime koshergrl mentions it that person has to drink.
I'll pick 'babykillers'...hell, I'll be drunk in no time!
'Butchers' would be another good one.
I'm sure you'll drink to just about anything.
I believe in choice. I'm consistent.Haha I never said I did, and please please post your own numbers. You want to refute and argue so much, well then tell me otherwise.No, it's because you don't have a clue on what you're speaking about.It's because as I've said many times the numbers don't really matter, it's an ethics question, not a math problem.You can't keep your story straight. First you say a 27 week old embryo has a 98% chance .... then you say 80% ... then you say 96% ... then you say 80% again.27 week PREMIE has about an 80% of making it. Now numbers on miscarriages and such are difficult to give just one number, bc of factors like has the mother had a miscarriage before and etc.Sadly, you're too slow to keep up. Earlier, you said there was an 80% chance of a 27 week old embryo of being born alive. Now you claim it's 96%. It's not. Where do you pull this nonsense from? And where have I changed my position? I've always said the people involved should get to choose for themselves.
But if you have different numbers then by all means post them and apply them to Sherri Tiavo, see if it's ok to kill her off. We can even do a poll on usmb see who thinks it's ok to for the husband to let her starve to death. So far all you have done is try to split hairs on the numbers in this scenario, claim they're crazy, but not post why they're crazy. So be my guest. At least winter born could actually make intelligent arguments, I think I poked holes in those arguments, but they were based on intelligence, not splitting hairs on numbers without rebuttals
Let me know when you agree with yourself on a single number and then we can resume this......
Oh, and get this ... you don't define ethics.
And can you confirm your belief in the scenario that the husband should be allowed to kill Sherri.
It's either use them to better medical science or flush 'em. I vote for medical science. Seems you're for flushing them.Yes let's cannibalize our unwanted young to increase our own life span. What a wonderful society we arePeople I idolize. There are several doctors quote in there who do the research. Dr. Carson did the research and defends it. You know nothing about the research. You don't care how much it can help. You don't care about women being victimized. Any lie you can tell to achieve your goal of banning reproductive freedom for women is ok.Yes, you do that. Just accept blindly what people you idolize tell you.I provided you with the actual abstract from the article that Ben Carson wrote. And, you lying prick, I answered your question. Neither your nor I are qualified to discuss the scientific basis of the research. So, I provided you with what those who are experts have said about the necessity of the research. Can you offer anything from an expert in this field that disputes the necessity of such research? No? Then shut the fuck up.What you think about it matters to no one but you.
So even after being asked direct question and not to quote some article you are clueless about you did just exactly that with an ad hominem for good measure.
It is apparent an intelligent conversation is beyond your abilities.
No it is not just me but those who read this thread in silence.
And why do you idolize them? You idolize them because they use the product of abortion and dead babies' flesh. You think that makes them special.
Yuck.
Nah, women don't have to keep their legs shut. That's their choice. Just as it's their choice to medically have their pregnancy terminated if that's what they want to do. Best part? All you get to do is cry about it.You have a problem with freedom? You pricks want to ban abortion, birth control, sex education and anything that might give a woman control over her reproductive life.Catchy phrase, "reproductive freedom" in an abortion thread ...............
Talk about irony ...................
Keep your legs shut, has worked since the creation of time, no one can take that.
I see nothing but ad hominems which I am going to start flagging.
Well thank you for being consistent, glad to hear you hold the very unpopular view of killing off someone who will probably be perfectly healthy in x amount of months. This is what you are sayingI believe in choice. I'm consistent.Haha I never said I did, and please please post your own numbers. You want to refute and argue so much, well then tell me otherwise.No, it's because you don't have a clue on what you're speaking about.It's because as I've said many times the numbers don't really matter, it's an ethics question, not a math problem.You can't keep your story straight. First you say a 27 week old embryo has a 98% chance .... then you say 80% ... then you say 96% ... then you say 80% again.27 week PREMIE has about an 80% of making it. Now numbers on miscarriages and such are difficult to give just one number, bc of factors like has the mother had a miscarriage before and etc.
But if you have different numbers then by all means post them and apply them to Sherri Tiavo, see if it's ok to kill her off. We can even do a poll on usmb see who thinks it's ok to for the husband to let her starve to death. So far all you have done is try to split hairs on the numbers in this scenario, claim they're crazy, but not post why they're crazy. So be my guest. At least winter born could actually make intelligent arguments, I think I poked holes in those arguments, but they were based on intelligence, not splitting hairs on numbers without rebuttals
Let me know when you agree with yourself on a single number and then we can resume this......
Oh, and get this ... you don't define ethics.
And can you confirm your belief in the scenario that the husband should be allowed to kill Sherri.
Well thank you for being consistent, glad to hear you hold the very unpopular view of killing off someone who will probably be perfectly healthy in x amount of months. This is what you are sayingI believe in choice. I'm consistent.Haha I never said I did, and please please post your own numbers. You want to refute and argue so much, well then tell me otherwise.No, it's because you don't have a clue on what you're speaking about.It's because as I've said many times the numbers don't really matter, it's an ethics question, not a math problem.You can't keep your story straight. First you say a 27 week old embryo has a 98% chance .... then you say 80% ... then you say 96% ... then you say 80% again.
Let me know when you agree with yourself on a single number and then we can resume this......
Oh, and get this ... you don't define ethics.
And can you confirm your belief in the scenario that the husband should be allowed to kill Sherri.
No there isn't. The American people hate planned parenthood and have been trying to run it out of business since it was first shoved down our throats by bad law.Well thank you for being consistent, glad to hear you hold the very unpopular view of killing off someone who will probably be perfectly healthy in x amount of months. This is what you are sayingI believe in choice. I'm consistent.Haha I never said I did, and please please post your own numbers. You want to refute and argue so much, well then tell me otherwise.No, it's because you don't have a clue on what you're speaking about.It's because as I've said many times the numbers don't really matter, it's an ethics question, not a math problem.
Oh, and get this ... you don't define ethics.
And can you confirm your belief in the scenario that the husband should be allowed to kill Sherri.
States Try To Dig Up Planned Parenthood Violations Fail Miserably
There is large support for PP from the common person, medical community to state and national leaders
And by the vile woman Margaret Sanger. If the hitler youth was still around today and gave out mammograms (PP just refers mammograms), no one would support it. Sanger believed that if you weren't deemed worthy by her, you should live on an island or be sterilized, especially if you were blackNo there isn't. The American people hate planned parenthood and have been trying to run it out of business since it was first shoved down our throats by bad law.Well thank you for being consistent, glad to hear you hold the very unpopular view of killing off someone who will probably be perfectly healthy in x amount of months. This is what you are sayingI believe in choice. I'm consistent.Haha I never said I did, and please please post your own numbers. You want to refute and argue so much, well then tell me otherwise.No, it's because you don't have a clue on what you're speaking about.
Oh, and get this ... you don't define ethics.
And can you confirm your belief in the scenario that the husband should be allowed to kill Sherri.
States Try To Dig Up Planned Parenthood Violations Fail Miserably
There is large support for PP from the common person, medical community to state and national leaders
Well if you're talking about an embryo, that is the choice of the woman carrying it. If you're talking about someone on life support, that is the choice of the person on life support or their next of kin had they not made that choice themselves.Well thank you for being consistent, glad to hear you hold the very unpopular view of killing off someone who will probably be perfectly healthy in x amount of months. This is what you are sayingI believe in choice. I'm consistent.Haha I never said I did, and please please post your own numbers. You want to refute and argue so much, well then tell me otherwise.No, it's because you don't have a clue on what you're speaking about.It's because as I've said many times the numbers don't really matter, it's an ethics question, not a math problem.You can't keep your story straight. First you say a 27 week old embryo has a 98% chance .... then you say 80% ... then you say 96% ... then you say 80% again.
Let me know when you agree with yourself on a single number and then we can resume this......
Oh, and get this ... you don't define ethics.
And can you confirm your belief in the scenario that the husband should be allowed to kill Sherri.
Stop lying. You've been shown polls indicating a majority of those polled are in favor of PP. Even after these latest videos have come out.No there isn't. The American people hate planned parenthood and have been trying to run it out of business since it was first shoved down our throats by bad law.Well thank you for being consistent, glad to hear you hold the very unpopular view of killing off someone who will probably be perfectly healthy in x amount of months. This is what you are sayingI believe in choice. I'm consistent.Haha I never said I did, and please please post your own numbers. You want to refute and argue so much, well then tell me otherwise.No, it's because you don't have a clue on what you're speaking about.
Oh, and get this ... you don't define ethics.
And can you confirm your belief in the scenario that the husband should be allowed to kill Sherri.
States Try To Dig Up Planned Parenthood Violations Fail Miserably
There is large support for PP from the common person, medical community to state and national leaders
Well if you're talking about an embryo, that is the choice of the woman carrying it. If you're talking about someone on life support, that is the choice of the person on life support or their next of kin had they not made that choice themselves.Well thank you for being consistent, glad to hear you hold the very unpopular view of killing off someone who will probably be perfectly healthy in x amount of months. This is what you are sayingI believe in choice. I'm consistent.Haha I never said I did, and please please post your own numbers. You want to refute and argue so much, well then tell me otherwise.No, it's because you don't have a clue on what you're speaking about.It's because as I've said many times the numbers don't really matter, it's an ethics question, not a math problem.
Oh, and get this ... you don't define ethics.
And can you confirm your belief in the scenario that the husband should be allowed to kill Sherri.
That's what I support.
The physician's assistant in my doctor's office is a big time euthanasia liberal. She demanded that I sign a health directive. I said I wanted everything. All measures no matter how fruitless. I thought her head would come off. I wasn't supposed to make that choice. Then she demanded my son's contact information. Maybe he would rather I died. I wouldn't give it to her. That's an invasion of privacy. His privacy.Well if you're talking about an embryo, that is the choice of the woman carrying it. If you're talking about someone on life support, that is the choice of the person on life support or their next of kin had they not made that choice themselves.Well thank you for being consistent, glad to hear you hold the very unpopular view of killing off someone who will probably be perfectly healthy in x amount of months. This is what you are sayingI believe in choice. I'm consistent.Haha I never said I did, and please please post your own numbers. You want to refute and argue so much, well then tell me otherwise.No, it's because you don't have a clue on what you're speaking about.
Oh, and get this ... you don't define ethics.
And can you confirm your belief in the scenario that the husband should be allowed to kill Sherri.
That's what I support.
Many people have living will and health directive so they won't end up on life support. I had to give permission for an attempt to implant a stint in my mother, but they couldn't. We knew she was not a candidate for open heart at her age. Now we are just making her as comfortable as possible. She fights about everything. Sorrow when the mind goes.
The physician's assistant in my doctor's office is a big time euthanasia liberal. She demanded that I sign a health directive. I said I wanted everything. All measures no matter how fruitless. I thought her head would come off. I wasn't supposed to make that choice. Then she demanded my son's contact information. Maybe he would rather I died. I wouldn't give it to her. That's an invasion of privacy. His privacy.Well if you're talking about an embryo, that is the choice of the woman carrying it. If you're talking about someone on life support, that is the choice of the person on life support or their next of kin had they not made that choice themselves.Well thank you for being consistent, glad to hear you hold the very unpopular view of killing off someone who will probably be perfectly healthy in x amount of months. This is what you are sayingI believe in choice. I'm consistent.Haha I never said I did, and please please post your own numbers. You want to refute and argue so much, well then tell me otherwise.
And can you confirm your belief in the scenario that the husband should be allowed to kill Sherri.
That's what I support.
Many people have living will and health directive so they won't end up on life support. I had to give permission for an attempt to implant a stint in my mother, but they couldn't. We knew she was not a candidate for open heart at her age. Now we are just making her as comfortable as possible. She fights about everything. Sorrow when the mind goes.
I just love fucking with liberals like that.
