Planned Parenthood caught trafficking in human body parts

The two main liberal arguments for abortion, 1) It's just a clump of cells and 2) I'm "pro choice", not pro abortion just left the building. Gone, kaput, see you later

Pro-Aborts: Here Are Two Arguments You Can’t Make Anymore


Abortion is the highest sacrament in the Church of Liberalism.

The killing of children is considered even holier and more sacred to its disciples than gay marriage or genital mutilation. Like the primitive pagan cultures before them, liberalism looks upon the sacred rite of child sacrifice with a deep reverence. The liberal has a cult-like, religious devotion to sacrament of infanticide. Liberals will venerate it for the same reason Catholics venerate the Eucharist and Muslims the Koran — because it is the centerpiece of their worship, the core, the soul of the thing.


Once we understand this, we should not be surprised by the events of these last few days. To the outside observer — someone mercifully unfamiliar with the teachings of the liberal church — it might seem surprising, even remarkable, that the nation’s largest abortion provider was caught on tape selling the dismembered body parts and organs of dead children, and that liberals immediately and passionately defended the practice. The behavior on the part of Planned Parenthood shouldn’t shock us, as I said yesterday, but neither should the nauseating response from the media and various liberal pundits.

I say “response,” but naturally the response from much of the media was nothing but a blaring, deafening silence. Aside from Fox News, most of the cable and network channels dusted off their patented blackout strategy, last employed during the Kermit Gosnell trial, and ignored the scandal completely. In fairness, CNN did have more important things to talk about, like Kylie Jenner’s hairdo.

Meanwhile, liberal bloggers and commentators rushed to rescue the damsel Planned Parenthood from the evil clutches of the right wing conspiracy. In a moment of sheer dementia, Slate called the selling of dead baby organs “fluff,” and insisted that the real issue is simply that abortion is kind of “gross” — but no grosser than heart surgery or child birth.

Yes, giving birth to a child is as gross as crushing its skull and hawking its parts for cash.

Citizens, this is liberalism. Look upon its revolting face and weep.

Attention Pro-Aborts Here Are Two Arguments You Can t Make Anymore TheBlaze.com
Are there any of yourown words in this post? or are you just spamming?

She uses her own words in the course of the discussion, then she supports them with outside sources. This is how grown-ups discuss and debate.
 
Wow, Planned Parenthood gets caught selling baby parts and the Gonad tweets this? Today? He needs better handlers


Barack Obama

✔@BarackObama

"We recognize that every child deserves opportunity. Not just some. Not just our own." —President Obama
 
Wow, Planned Parenthood gets caught selling baby parts and the Gonad tweets this? Today? He needs better handlers


Barack Obama

✔@BarackObama

"We recognize that every child deserves opportunity. Not just some. Not just our own." —President Obama
It's in line with the lie that killing SOME babies gives OTHER children a better chance.

What he means is "We recognize that our children deserve the opportunities they are afforded when your babies die". The exact opposite of what he actually says, which is the way progs work.
 
PP and the baby killing acolytes like coyote and others are going to spin this that PP does these women a favor by turning the babies around, dilating the women more in order to facilitate harvesting, (more dangerous and illegal), and harvesting the organs of their babies, and getting $$$ for them.
 
PP and the baby killing acolytes like coyote and others are going to spin this that PP does these women a favor by turning the babies around, dilating the women more in order to facilitate harvesting, (more dangerous and illegal), and harvesting the organs of their babies, and getting $$$ for them.

All the spin in the world won't make it right, disgusting, evil and ghoulish. They know it but can't bring themselves to admit it
 
The fetus isn't a person.
African slaves were once considered less human than their white counterparts. Did it make them less human?

A fetus isn't a person.

Are you going to grant personhood to sperm now?
Why would anyone do that? Sperm is part of a person. A developing baby is not. Surely you can see the difference, or are you just trying to cloud the issue with hyperbole?

Sorry but a developing baby IS part of a person. It share's at least one half the DNA with it's host.
Conjoined twins share much more than that, yet no one says they are one person simply because they have a biological connection. In fact, a mother expecting conjoined twins is not told she is going to have a single baby. She's told she will have twins.

She is going to have. She is expecting. It isn't a person yet.
 
The killing of children is considered even holier and more sacred to its disciples than gay marriage or genital mutilation.

If you have to lie you've lost.

Get lost blind puppy doggy

Quit lying.

GFY, pooch

You guys really don't have a thing without resorting to lies do you?

It's what you do. Like Geico........it's what you do.

:spinner::spinner:
 
The killing of children is considered even holier and more sacred to its disciples than gay marriage or genital mutilation.

If you have to lie you've lost.

Get lost blind puppy doggy

Quit lying.

GFY, pooch

You guy really don't have a thing without resorting to lies do you?

It's what you do. Like Geico........it's what you do.

:spinner::spinner:
:up_yours:
 
African slaves were once considered less human than their white counterparts. Did it make them less human?

A fetus isn't a person.

Are you going to grant personhood to sperm now?
Why would anyone do that? Sperm is part of a person. A developing baby is not. Surely you can see the difference, or are you just trying to cloud the issue with hyperbole?

Sorry but a developing baby IS part of a person. It share's at least one half the DNA with it's host.
Conjoined twins share much more than that, yet no one says they are one person simply because they have a biological connection. In fact, a mother expecting conjoined twins is not told she is going to have a single baby. She's told she will have twins.

She is going to have. She is expecting. It isn't a person yet.
Irrelevant. The baby is not part of her body.
 
A fetus isn't a person.

Are you going to grant personhood to sperm now?
Why would anyone do that? Sperm is part of a person. A developing baby is not. Surely you can see the difference, or are you just trying to cloud the issue with hyperbole?

Sorry but a developing baby IS part of a person. It share's at least one half the DNA with it's host.
Conjoined twins share much more than that, yet no one says they are one person simply because they have a biological connection. In fact, a mother expecting conjoined twins is not told she is going to have a single baby. She's told she will have twins.

She is going to have. She is expecting. It isn't a person yet.
Irrelevant. The baby is not part of her body.

It is until it can live without it.
 
Imagine the career opportunities! Enjoy a good lay; kick back for a few weeks gestating and then be relived of the burden and get paid for it! What's not to like? But would it help Our Kenyan Emperor's employment stats? Would parts-growing qualify as an occupation - like farming?
 
Last edited:
Why would anyone do that? Sperm is part of a person. A developing baby is not. Surely you can see the difference, or are you just trying to cloud the issue with hyperbole?

Sorry but a developing baby IS part of a person. It share's at least one half the DNA with it's host.
Conjoined twins share much more than that, yet no one says they are one person simply because they have a biological connection. In fact, a mother expecting conjoined twins is not told she is going to have a single baby. She's told she will have twins.

She is going to have. She is expecting. It isn't a person yet.
Irrelevant. The baby is not part of her body.

It is until it can live without it.
False. Conjoined twins who cannot live without the other are considered separate persons.
 
The two main liberal arguments for abortion, 1) It's just a clump of cells and 2) I'm "pro choice", not pro abortion just left the building. Gone, kaput, see you later
Pro-Aborts: Here Are Two Arguments You Can’t Make Anymore

Abortion is the highest sacrament in the Church of Liberalism.

The killing of children is considered even holier and more sacred to its disciples than gay marriage or genital mutilation. Like the primitive pagan cultures before them, liberalism looks upon the sacred rite of child sacrifice with a deep reverence. The liberal has a cult-like, religious devotion to sacrament of infanticide. Liberals will venerate it for the same reason Catholics venerate the Eucharist and Muslims the Koran — because it is the centerpiece of their worship, the core, the soul of the thing.


Once we understand this, we should not be surprised by the events of these last few days. To the outside observer — someone mercifully unfamiliar with the teachings of the liberal church — it might seem surprising, even remarkable, that the nation’s largest abortion provider was caught on tape selling the dismembered body parts and organs of dead children, and that liberals immediately and passionately defended the practice. The behavior on the part of Planned Parenthood shouldn’t shock us, as I said yesterday, but neither should the nauseating response from the media and various liberal pundits.

I say “response,” but naturally the response from much of the media was nothing but a blaring, deafening silence. Aside from Fox News, most of the cable and network channels dusted off their patented blackout strategy, last employed during the Kermit Gosnell trial, and ignored the scandal completely. In fairness, CNN did have more important things to talk about, like Kylie Jenner’s hairdo.

Meanwhile, liberal bloggers and commentators rushed to rescue the damsel Planned Parenthood from the evil clutches of the right wing conspiracy. In a moment of sheer dementia, Slate called the selling of dead baby organs “fluff,” and insisted that the real issue is simply that abortion is kind of “gross” — but no grosser than heart surgery or child birth.

Yes, giving birth to a child is as gross as crushing its skull and hawking its parts for cash.

Citizens, this is liberalism. Look upon its revolting face and weep.

Attention Pro-Aborts Here Are Two Arguments You Can t Make Anymore TheBlaze.com
Are there any of yourown words in this post? or are you just spamming?

Try and stay on point, if not stop responding to me. I'm tired of the liberal spin and deflection and if you continue I'll simply ignore you
You're not supposed to cut-n-paste an article without at least making some kind of original comment of your own...or that's called spamming. It's a sign of a true parrot.

But while I have you. I am all for the killing of human babies during the first a second trimester of pregnancy, and that is legal too.

How is that for relevant to the topic?

Your attempt to demonize my position won't work on me.


If that is your position you have demonized yourself....we don't have to do a thing.......
 

Forum List

Back
Top