Pocahontas erupts about her "economic patriotism" plan while giving 2020 speech in New Hampshire

Patriots dont shit on the constitution.
Of course, we already knew she was a huge liar. A fake.

She hasn’t lied
She is very sincere about her views on the excesses of the wealthy
 
With all the gross "fakery" in American politics, it's a wonder Warren even registers on the radar.
 
Last edited:
Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.
 
Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that
 
Patriots dont shit on the constitution.
Of course, we already knew she was a huge liar. A fake.

She hasn’t lied
She is very sincere about her views on the excesses of the wealthy
She is fake as fuck. But so are you :dunno:
Hardly a fake.....she is committed to standing up for poor and working Americans
Yeah, I saw her drink that beer too.:21:
More than we can say about Trump
 
Patriots dont shit on the constitution.
Of course, we already knew she was a huge liar. A fake.

She hasn’t lied
She is very sincere about her views on the excesses of the wealthy
Fauxcohontas speak with forked tongue for many moons.

Maybe we need to start calling Trump Sven

Trump faked his heritage just like he's accusing Warren of doing

Shortly after World War II, Donald Trump's father Fred falsely claimed their family was Swedish, hiding their German heritage to avoid any problems selling apartments to Jewish customers, the Boston Globe reported last year. Donald Trump was still claiming Swedish heritage as late as his 1987 book "Art of the Deal," in which he writes that his grandfather came to the U.S. from Sweden.
 
Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

You are clearly clueless.

The top 5% of income earners pay 60% of income taxes.

The bottom 50% of income earners pay 3% of income taxes.

So, define your "fair share" for us, Sport.
 
Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

You are clearly clueless.

The top 5% of income earners pay 60% of income taxes.

The bottom 50% of income earners pay 3% of income taxes.

So, define your "fair share" for us, Sport.
Not bad considering they have 65 percent of the wealth
Our top tax bracket and business is taxed at the lowest rate in 80 years. It has not resulted in the trickle down that was promised


800px-Distribution_of_Wealth_in_the_United_States.svg.png


.
 
Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

You are clearly clueless.

The top 5% of income earners pay 60% of income taxes.

The bottom 50% of income earners pay 3% of income taxes.

So, define your "fair share" for us, Sport.
Not bad considering they have 70 percent of the wealth
Our top tax bracket and business is taxed at the lowest rate in 80 years. It has not resulted in the trickle down that was promised
Once again you demonstrate how clueless you are. The top income tax rate after the '86 tax cut was 33%. It is 37% now.


Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

Once again a Dimwinger dodges the "fair share" question.:21:
 
Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

You are clearly clueless.

The top 5% of income earners pay 60% of income taxes.

The bottom 50% of income earners pay 3% of income taxes.

So, define your "fair share" for us, Sport.
Not bad considering they have 70 percent of the wealth
Our top tax bracket and business is taxed at the lowest rate in 80 years. It has not resulted in the trickle down that was promised
Once again you demonstrate how clueless you are. The top income tax rate after the '86 tax cut was 33%. It is 37% now.


Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

Once again a Dimwinger dodges the "fair share" question.:21:

4 percent? For a short time
What was the top rate before Reagan slashed it?

Why don’t we go back to the pre 86 rate?

Supply side did not deliver what was promised
 
Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

You are clearly clueless.

The top 5% of income earners pay 60% of income taxes.

The bottom 50% of income earners pay 3% of income taxes.

So, define your "fair share" for us, Sport.
Not bad considering they have 70 percent of the wealth
Our top tax bracket and business is taxed at the lowest rate in 80 years. It has not resulted in the trickle down that was promised
Once again you demonstrate how clueless you are. The top income tax rate after the '86 tax cut was 33%. It is 37% now.


Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

Once again a Dimwinger dodges the "fair share" question.:21:

4 percent? For a short time
What was the top rate before Reagan slashed it?

Why don’t we go back to the pre 86 rate?

Supply side did not deliver what was promised
Supply side created the longest economic boom in history.

Still dodging the "fair share" question I see. How predictable.
 
Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

You are clearly clueless.

The top 5% of income earners pay 60% of income taxes.

The bottom 50% of income earners pay 3% of income taxes.

So, define your "fair share" for us, Sport.
Not bad considering they have 70 percent of the wealth
Our top tax bracket and business is taxed at the lowest rate in 80 years. It has not resulted in the trickle down that was promised
Once again you demonstrate how clueless you are. The top income tax rate after the '86 tax cut was 33%. It is 37% now.


Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

Once again a Dimwinger dodges the "fair share" question.:21:

4 percent? For a short time
What was the top rate before Reagan slashed it?

Why don’t we go back to the pre 86 rate?

Supply side did not deliver what was promised


Are you going back to the same exclusions, deductions and exemptions that were available then? No one paid the top rate.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top