Pocahontas erupts about her "economic patriotism" plan while giving 2020 speech in New Hampshire

[rightwinger]

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

You are clearly clueless.

The top 5% of income earners pay 60% of income taxes.

The bottom 50% of income earners pay 3% of income taxes.

So, define your "fair share" for us, Sport.

Not bad considering they have 70 percent of the wealth
Our top tax bracket and business is taxed at the lowest rate in 80 years. It has not resulted in the trickle down that was promised

Once again you demonstrate how clueless you are. The top income tax rate after the '86 tax cut was 33%. It is 37% now.


Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

Once again a Dimwinger dodges the "fair share" question.

4 percent? For a short time
What was the top rate before Reagan slashed it?

Why don’t we go back to the pre 86 rate?

Supply side did not deliver what was promised

Are you going back to the same exclusions, deductions and exemptions that were available then? No one paid the top rate.

.

They don’t pay top rate now either

 

[rightwinger]

Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

Typical commie lies.

.

Actually, it is how a society works

 

[OKTexas]

You are clearly clueless.

The top 5% of income earners pay 60% of income taxes.

The bottom 50% of income earners pay 3% of income taxes.

So, define your "fair share" for us, Sport.

Not bad considering they have 70 percent of the wealth
Our top tax bracket and business is taxed at the lowest rate in 80 years. It has not resulted in the trickle down that was promised

Once again you demonstrate how clueless you are. The top income tax rate after the '86 tax cut was 33%. It is 37% now.


Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

Once again a Dimwinger dodges the "fair share" question.

4 percent? For a short time
What was the top rate before Reagan slashed it?

Why don’t we go back to the pre 86 rate?

Supply side did not deliver what was promised

Are you going back to the same exclusions, deductions and exemptions that were available then? No one paid the top rate.

.

They don’t pay top rate now either

So tell the class what rate they do pay.

.

 

[rightwinger]

Not bad considering they have 70 percent of the wealth
Our top tax bracket and business is taxed at the lowest rate in 80 years. It has not resulted in the trickle down that was promised

Once again you demonstrate how clueless you are. The top income tax rate after the '86 tax cut was 33%. It is 37% now.


Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

Once again a Dimwinger dodges the "fair share" question.

4 percent? For a short time
What was the top rate before Reagan slashed it?

Why don’t we go back to the pre 86 rate?

Supply side did not deliver what was promised

Are you going back to the same exclusions, deductions and exemptions that were available then? No one paid the top rate.

.

They don’t pay top rate now either

So tell the class what rate they do pay.

.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

Typical commie lies.

.

Actually, it is how a society works

No that's how the commies see it. Who the hell do you think are paying for the vast majority of society and new infrastructure now? Hint it ain't Jose and his taco truck.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Once again you demonstrate how clueless you are. The top income tax rate after the '86 tax cut was 33%. It is 37% now.


Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

Once again a Dimwinger dodges the "fair share" question.

4 percent? For a short time
What was the top rate before Reagan slashed it?

Why don’t we go back to the pre 86 rate?

Supply side did not deliver what was promised

Are you going back to the same exclusions, deductions and exemptions that were available then? No one paid the top rate.

.

They don’t pay top rate now either

So tell the class what rate they do pay.

.

View attachment 298119

.

So now you try to muddy the waters by adding in State and local taxes. Warren is talking about federal taxes. Stay on topic.

.

 

[Nostra]

4 percent? For a short time
What was the top rate before Reagan slashed it?

Why don’t we go back to the pre 86 rate?

Supply side did not deliver what was promised

Are you going back to the same exclusions, deductions and exemptions that were available then? No one paid the top rate.

.

They don’t pay top rate now either

So tell the class what rate they do pay.

.

View attachment 298119

.

So now you try to muddy the waters by adding in State and local taxes. Warren is talking about federal taxes. Stay on topic.

.

And it is limited to the 400 richest families. Those folks live off investments, so bringing them in to a discussion about income taxes is disingenuous at best

He knows he lost the debate and is flailing.

 

[rightwinger]

Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

Typical commie lies.

.

Actually, it is how a society works

No that's how the commies see it. Who the hell do you think are paying for the vast majority of society and new infrastructure now? Hint it ain't Jose and his taco truck.

.

We have a progressive tax rate
That rate expects the wealthy, who benefit the most from society, to pay the most

What we have been expecting from the wealthy has been drastically reduced over the last 40 years

The middle class has paid the price

 

[rightwinger]

Are you going back to the same exclusions, deductions and exemptions that were available then? No one paid the top rate.

.

They don’t pay top rate now either

So tell the class what rate they do pay.

.

View attachment 298119

.

So now you try to muddy the waters by adding in State and local taxes. Warren is talking about federal taxes. Stay on topic.

.

And it is limited to the 400 richest families. Those folks live off investments, so bringing them in to a discussion about income taxes is disingenuous at best

He knows he lost the debate and is flailing.

400 richest families have more money than the bottom 50 percent of Americans

 

[OKTexas]

Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

Typical commie lies.

.

Actually, it is how a society works

No that's how the commies see it. Who the hell do you think are paying for the vast majority of society and new infrastructure now? Hint it ain't Jose and his taco truck.

.

We have a progressive tax rate
That rate expects the wealthy, who benefit the most from society, to pay the most

What we have been expecting from the wealthy has been drastically reduced over the last 40 years

The middle class has paid the price

The deductions they are allowed have been reduced also. So what's your point. Why is it you commies only want to look at one side of the equation?

.

 

[Nostra]

They don’t pay top rate now either

So tell the class what rate they do pay.

.

View attachment 298119

.

So now you try to muddy the waters by adding in State and local taxes. Warren is talking about federal taxes. Stay on topic.

.

And it is limited to the 400 richest families. Those folks live off investments, so bringing them in to a discussion about income taxes is disingenuous at best

He knows he lost the debate and is flailing.

400 richest families have more money than the bottom 50 percent of Americans

So? That has nothing to do with the discussion.

You are still flailing and deflecting.

 

[Nostra]

Nothing economically patriotic about taking from high income earners and entrepreneurs.

It is patriotic to expect them to contribute to the society from which they profit on

Like Warren says......you didn’t build that

Typical commie lies.

.

Actually, it is how a society works

No that's how the commies see it. Who the hell do you think are paying for the vast majority of society and new infrastructure now? Hint it ain't Jose and his taco truck.

.

We have a progressive tax rate
That rate expects the wealthy, who benefit the most from society, to pay the most

What we have been expecting from the wealthy has been drastically reduced over the last 40 years

The middle class has paid the price

They do pay the most. I already demonstrated that.

 

[OKTexas]

They don’t pay top rate now either

So tell the class what rate they do pay.

.

View attachment 298119

.

So now you try to muddy the waters by adding in State and local taxes. Warren is talking about federal taxes. Stay on topic.

.

And it is limited to the 400 richest families. Those folks live off investments, so bringing them in to a discussion about income taxes is disingenuous at best

He knows he lost the debate and is flailing.

400 richest families have more money than the bottom 50 percent of Americans

And that makes it OK for commies to confiscate their money, after they've paid their required taxes?

.

 

[rightwinger]

So tell the class what rate they do pay.

.

View attachment 298119

.

So now you try to muddy the waters by adding in State and local taxes. Warren is talking about federal taxes. Stay on topic.

.

And it is limited to the 400 richest families. Those folks live off investments, so bringing them in to a discussion about income taxes is disingenuous at best

He knows he lost the debate and is flailing.

400 richest families have more money than the bottom 50 percent of Americans

So? That has nothing to do with the discussion.

You are still flailing and deflecting.

Has everything to do with the discussion

Why does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

That is what Liz Warren is asking

 

[Nostra]

View attachment 298119

.

So now you try to muddy the waters by adding in State and local taxes. Warren is talking about federal taxes. Stay on topic.

.

And it is limited to the 400 richest families. Those folks live off investments, so bringing them in to a discussion about income taxes is disingenuous at best

He knows he lost the debate and is flailing.

400 richest families have more money than the bottom 50 percent of Americans

So? That has nothing to do with the discussion.

You are still flailing and deflecting.

Has everything to do with the discussion

Why does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

That is what Liz Warren is asking

How does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

Be specific.

 

[rightwinger]

So now you try to muddy the waters by adding in State and local taxes. Warren is talking about federal taxes. Stay on topic.

.

And it is limited to the 400 richest families. Those folks live off investments, so bringing them in to a discussion about income taxes is disingenuous at best

He knows he lost the debate and is flailing.

400 richest families have more money than the bottom 50 percent of Americans

So? That has nothing to do with the discussion.

You are still flailing and deflecting.

Has everything to do with the discussion

Why does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

That is what Liz Warren is asking

How does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

Be specific.

Let’s see

Tax reduction
Deregulation of markets
Relaxation of worker protections
Environmental
Protection of foreign investments

 

[OKTexas]

And it is limited to the 400 richest families. Those folks live off investments, so bringing them in to a discussion about income taxes is disingenuous at best

He knows he lost the debate and is flailing.

400 richest families have more money than the bottom 50 percent of Americans

So? That has nothing to do with the discussion.

You are still flailing and deflecting.

Has everything to do with the discussion

Why does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

That is what Liz Warren is asking

How does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

Be specific.

Let’s see

Tax reduction
Deregulation of markets
Relaxation of worker protections
Environmental
Protection of foreign investments

Repatriation of more than a trillion dollars held overseas.

.

 

[rightwinger]

400 richest families have more money than the bottom 50 percent of Americans

So? That has nothing to do with the discussion.

You are still flailing and deflecting.

Has everything to do with the discussion

Why does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

That is what Liz Warren is asking

How does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

Be specific.

Let’s see

Tax reduction
Deregulation of markets
Relaxation of worker protections
Environmental
Protection of foreign investments

Repatriation of more than a trillion dollars held overseas.

.

Trillion dollars stashed overseas?
Then why did we give them a $1.5 trillion tax cut?

Liz Warren is correct

 

[Nostra]

And it is limited to the 400 richest families. Those folks live off investments, so bringing them in to a discussion about income taxes is disingenuous at best

He knows he lost the debate and is flailing.

400 richest families have more money than the bottom 50 percent of Americans

So? That has nothing to do with the discussion.

You are still flailing and deflecting.

Has everything to do with the discussion

Why does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

That is what Liz Warren is asking

How does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

Be specific.

Let’s see

Tax reduction-Across the board tax cuts. FAIL
Deregulation of markets-Job creation for workers-FAIL
Relaxation of worker protections-Link?
Environmental-?????? Pollution only hurts working folks? WTF do you mean by "environmental". Be specific.
Protection of foreign investments-How do we protect foreign investments?

See above.

 

[g5000]

go get em Lizzy!

Can you summarize?

"Tax the rich more!"