Pocahontas erupts about her "economic patriotism" plan while giving 2020 speech in New Hampshire

Letā€™s see

Tax reduction-Across the board tax cuts. FAIL
Deregulation of markets-Job creation for workers-FAIL
Relaxation of worker protections-Link?
Environmental-?????? Pollution only hurts working folks? WTF do you mean by "environmental". Be specific.
Protection of foreign investments-How do we protect foreign investments?
See above.
All helped the wealthy to acquire and retain more wealth than it helped working Americans

The top 20 percent of Americans pay 87 percent of the Income Taxes. Thatā€™s Americans making $150k or more. How and why does that not suffice your justification that America has helped the wealthy squire and retain wealth? How is America supposed to help ā€œworking Americansā€ acquire more wealth? Some working Americans are paying no taxes? What about what America does for non-working Americans who pay no taxes?

Please spare us any ā€œfair shareā€ bullshit shell games where the wealthy pay more in real dollars but less in percentages than the Middle Class. The wealthy, in particular, the high income earners, pay more, period.

Not too shabby when they control 90 percent of the wealth

Who or what should control wealth? Iā€™d rather have an opportunity to create wealth in the face of entrepreneurs and capitalists vs. having no opportunity in the face of socialists who control the wealth and share only with fellow statists and cronies.
Iā€™d rather not have to have taxpayers subsidize the pay of working Americans so that our wealthy can pocket more profit
 
Warren's 2020 Democratic primary candidacy is toast.


The Massachusetts lawmaker's fundraising woes are evident, as is her collapse in the polls.

What many people probably have not noticed, however, is that she is also quietly trying to bury her signature domestic policy proposal: "Medicare for all," an absurd multitrillion-dollar program that would require funding not even she can explain.

ā€œWarren herself is barely speaking of the proposal,ā€ the New York Times reported this week in an article titled, ā€œElizabeth Warren isnā€™t talking much about ā€˜medicare for allā€™ anymore.ā€
 
Letā€™s see

Tax reduction-Across the board tax cuts. FAIL
Deregulation of markets-Job creation for workers-FAIL
Relaxation of worker protections-Link?
Environmental-?????? Pollution only hurts working folks? WTF do you mean by "environmental". Be specific.
Protection of foreign investments-How do we protect foreign investments?
See above.
All helped the wealthy to acquire and retain more wealth than it helped working Americans

The top 20 percent of Americans pay 87 percent of the Income Taxes. Thatā€™s Americans making $150k or more. How and why does that not suffice your justification that America has helped the wealthy squire and retain wealth? How is America supposed to help ā€œworking Americansā€ acquire more wealth? Some working Americans are paying no taxes? What about what America does for non-working Americans who pay no taxes?

Please spare us any ā€œfair shareā€ bullshit shell games where the wealthy pay more in real dollars but less in percentages than the Middle Class. The wealthy, in particular, the high income earners, pay more, period.

Not too shabby when they control 90 percent of the wealth






Yeah, the progressive left has been instrumental in the ruling elite amassing that wealth.

Thanks for pointing that out.
Iā€™m willing to end the gravy train
Why arenā€™t you?

Why help the wealthy when they obviously donā€™t need it?
 


go get em Lizzy!



Well I could only tolerate about 2.5 minutes of her communist manifesto. Bumped through the rest, different topic, same solution, break the country. Fuck her.

.


Fucking retired second grade dork teacher for president. No way. She should be learning how to make tastier cupcakes [emoji3164]. [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Distinguished professor in economics and commercial law
 
How does our policy favor the 400 over working Americans?

Be specific.
Letā€™s see

Tax reduction-Across the board tax cuts. FAIL
Deregulation of markets-Job creation for workers-FAIL
Relaxation of worker protections-Link?
Environmental-?????? Pollution only hurts working folks? WTF do you mean by "environmental". Be specific.
Protection of foreign investments-How do we protect foreign investments?
See above.
All helped the wealthy to acquire and retain more wealth than it helped working Americans

The top 20 percent of Americans pay 87 percent of the Income Taxes. Thatā€™s Americans making $150k or more. How and why does that not suffice your justification that America has helped the wealthy squire and retain wealth? How is America supposed to help ā€œworking Americansā€ acquire more wealth? Some working Americans are paying no taxes? What about what America does for non-working Americans who pay no taxes?

Please spare us any ā€œfair shareā€ bullshit shell games where the wealthy pay more in real dollars but less in percentages than the Middle Class. The wealthy, in particular, the high income earners, pay more, period.

Not too shabby when they control 90 percent of the wealth


Do you not understand the difference between income and wealth?

.
 
See above.
All helped the wealthy to acquire and retain more wealth than it helped working Americans

The top 20 percent of Americans pay 87 percent of the Income Taxes. Thatā€™s Americans making $150k or more. How and why does that not suffice your justification that America has helped the wealthy squire and retain wealth? How is America supposed to help ā€œworking Americansā€ acquire more wealth? Some working Americans are paying no taxes? What about what America does for non-working Americans who pay no taxes?

Please spare us any ā€œfair shareā€ bullshit shell games where the wealthy pay more in real dollars but less in percentages than the Middle Class. The wealthy, in particular, the high income earners, pay more, period.

Not too shabby when they control 90 percent of the wealth

Who or what should control wealth? Iā€™d rather have an opportunity to create wealth in the face of entrepreneurs and capitalists vs. having no opportunity in the face of socialists who control the wealth and share only with fellow statists and cronies.
Iā€™d rather not have to have taxpayers subsidize the pay of working Americans so that our wealthy can pocket more profit

Class envy wonā€™t solve that one.
 
See above.
All helped the wealthy to acquire and retain more wealth than it helped working Americans

The top 20 percent of Americans pay 87 percent of the Income Taxes. Thatā€™s Americans making $150k or more. How and why does that not suffice your justification that America has helped the wealthy squire and retain wealth? How is America supposed to help ā€œworking Americansā€ acquire more wealth? Some working Americans are paying no taxes? What about what America does for non-working Americans who pay no taxes?

Please spare us any ā€œfair shareā€ bullshit shell games where the wealthy pay more in real dollars but less in percentages than the Middle Class. The wealthy, in particular, the high income earners, pay more, period.

Not too shabby when they control 90 percent of the wealth






Yeah, the progressive left has been instrumental in the ruling elite amassing that wealth.

Thanks for pointing that out.
Iā€™m willing to end the gravy train
Why arenā€™t you?

Why help the wealthy when they obviously donā€™t need it?

Keep in mind, you are assailing the wealthy but the wealthy has different stripes as well. The Kerrys, Kennedys, Pelosis, Gores...., they keep getting wealthy while the Clintons and Obamas enter public service and emerge as multimillionaires. They are telling you what you want to hear while pushing policy that conceptually is aimed at corporations and wealthy individuals but the ones who really pay are the high income earners; upper middle class.
 
Trump was economically brave and fought getting VD in order to fulfill his patriotic duty.
 


go get em Lizzy!



Well I could only tolerate about 2.5 minutes of her communist manifesto. Bumped through the rest, different topic, same solution, break the country. Fuck her.

.


Fucking retired second grade dork teacher for president. No way. She should be learning how to make tastier cupcakes [emoji3164]. [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Distinguished professor in economics and commercial law


Screeching Cheeks is quite distinguished considering how she shit on the Native American community in order to get a job. That's not something you see everyday.... even from the marxist Dims.....
 
Trump was economically brave and fought getting VD in order to fulfill his patriotic duty.
He did know more than the generals
He would have won the Vietnam War if he served
 


go get em Lizzy!



Well I could only tolerate about 2.5 minutes of her communist manifesto. Bumped through the rest, different topic, same solution, break the country. Fuck her.

.


Fucking retired second grade dork teacher for president. No way. She should be learning how to make tastier cupcakes [emoji3164]. [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Distinguished professor in economics and commercial law


Screeching Cheeks is quite distinguished considering how she shit on the Native American community in order to get a job. That's not something you see everyday.... even from the marxist Dims.....

Actually, she has been very supportive of Native American causes
 
All helped the wealthy to acquire and retain more wealth than it helped working Americans

The top 20 percent of Americans pay 87 percent of the Income Taxes. Thatā€™s Americans making $150k or more. How and why does that not suffice your justification that America has helped the wealthy squire and retain wealth? How is America supposed to help ā€œworking Americansā€ acquire more wealth? Some working Americans are paying no taxes? What about what America does for non-working Americans who pay no taxes?

Please spare us any ā€œfair shareā€ bullshit shell games where the wealthy pay more in real dollars but less in percentages than the Middle Class. The wealthy, in particular, the high income earners, pay more, period.

Not too shabby when they control 90 percent of the wealth






Yeah, the progressive left has been instrumental in the ruling elite amassing that wealth.

Thanks for pointing that out.
Iā€™m willing to end the gravy train
Why arenā€™t you?

Why help the wealthy when they obviously donā€™t need it?

Keep in mind, you are assailing the wealthy but the wealthy has different stripes as well. The Kerrys, Kennedys, Pelosis, Gores...., they keep getting wealthy while the Clintons and Obamas enter public service and emerge as multimillionaires. They are telling you what you want to hear while pushing policy that conceptually is aimed at corporations and wealthy individuals but the ones who really pay are the high income earners; upper middle class.

Kerryā€™s, Kennedyā€™s, Pelosi, Gores, Clinton and Obamaā€™s all agree to raising their own taxes

Trump slashed his own taxes while he supports cutting benefits for the poor

See the difference?
 
The top 20 percent of Americans pay 87 percent of the Income Taxes. Thatā€™s Americans making $150k or more. How and why does that not suffice your justification that America has helped the wealthy squire and retain wealth? How is America supposed to help ā€œworking Americansā€ acquire more wealth? Some working Americans are paying no taxes? What about what America does for non-working Americans who pay no taxes?

Please spare us any ā€œfair shareā€ bullshit shell games where the wealthy pay more in real dollars but less in percentages than the Middle Class. The wealthy, in particular, the high income earners, pay more, period.

Not too shabby when they control 90 percent of the wealth






Yeah, the progressive left has been instrumental in the ruling elite amassing that wealth.

Thanks for pointing that out.
Iā€™m willing to end the gravy train
Why arenā€™t you?

Why help the wealthy when they obviously donā€™t need it?

Keep in mind, you are assailing the wealthy but the wealthy has different stripes as well. The Kerrys, Kennedys, Pelosis, Gores...., they keep getting wealthy while the Clintons and Obamas enter public service and emerge as multimillionaires. They are telling you what you want to hear while pushing policy that conceptually is aimed at corporations and wealthy individuals but the ones who really pay are the high income earners; upper middle class.

Kerryā€™s, Kennedyā€™s, Pelosi, Gores, Clinton and Obamaā€™s all agree to raising their own taxes

Trump slashed his own taxes while he supports cutting benefits for the poor

See the difference?






Everyone of them has become hundred millionaires by passing legislation that helped them while fucking over regular Americans. Of course they will vote to pay more, they can write the laws to suit them. Just like they wrote the laws to benefit their businesses over the common person.

Idiot.
 


go get em Lizzy!



Well I could only tolerate about 2.5 minutes of her communist manifesto. Bumped through the rest, different topic, same solution, break the country. Fuck her.

.


Fucking retired second grade dork teacher for president. No way. She should be learning how to make tastier cupcakes [emoji3164]. [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Distinguished professor in economics and commercial law


Distinction lib dims donā€™t count.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


go get em Lizzy!



Well I could only tolerate about 2.5 minutes of her communist manifesto. Bumped through the rest, different topic, same solution, break the country. Fuck her.

.


Fucking retired second grade dork teacher for president. No way. She should be learning how to make tastier cupcakes [emoji3164]. [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Distinguished professor in economics and commercial law


Distinguished lib dims donā€™t count.
Itā€™s like fucking nails on a chalkboard. Iā€™d rather be waterboarded for 57 minutes. Is that the voice you will hear for eternity in hell?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


go get em Lizzy!



Well I could only tolerate about 2.5 minutes of her communist manifesto. Bumped through the rest, different topic, same solution, break the country. Fuck her.

.


Fucking retired second grade dork teacher for president. No way. She should be learning how to make tastier cupcakes [emoji3164]. [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Distinguished professor in economics and commercial law


Screeching Cheeks is quite distinguished considering how she shit on the Native American community in order to get a job. That's not something you see everyday.... even from the marxist Dims.....


You could use that face and voice to recondition sex offenders. Cheaper and more successful than chemical castration.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


go get em Lizzy!



Well I could only tolerate about 2.5 minutes of her communist manifesto. Bumped through the rest, different topic, same solution, break the country. Fuck her.

.


Fucking retired second grade dork teacher for president. No way. She should be learning how to make tastier cupcakes [emoji3164]. [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Distinguished professor in economics and commercial law


Screeching Cheeks is quite distinguished considering how she shit on the Native American community in order to get a job. That's not something you see everyday.... even from the marxist Dims.....

Actually, she has been very supportive of Native American causes


Really? Is that why they love her so. She did the equivalent of putting on black face to the American Indian population. Maybe the people of Dubai would receive her better.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Forum List

Back
Top