- Moderator
- #101
you cant stay consistentmy god you just cant seem to understand that a constitutional right to free speech is not a constitutional right to government employment.
Again, and I'll put this in the most basic English I can for you to understand, the government cannot legally violate your rights. The First Amendment is a part of what we call the Bill of Rights. I learned that in elementary school. Maybe you weren't as fortunate. That amendment guarantees the right to free speech and expression which the government cannot legally prohibit. If a government employer terminates your employment for exercising that expression on your own private property that is a violation. I could explain to an eight year old and they could understand this better than you.
Actually, I'm not convinced you don't understand it; you're just so heavily biased and dishonest that you don't care.
let me ask this - should a police officer that makes racist, homophobic, and sexist remarks off duty on social media be allowed to remain employed?
That's a matter of one's opinion. In my opinion, no, because a I stated earlier those would be considered direct threats towards the public. Flying a flag in one's yard that millions of other people do constitutes no such thing.
Again, not hard to understand. It just takes firing brain cells and eliminating your personal prejudice from the equation.
I've been consistent throughout the entire discussion.
(you invented the b.s. about 'threats')
Nope, I clearly stated that earlier.
they can't fly racist symbols.
What racist symbol was she flying?