"Pompous Little Twit"

[Jitss617]

I surrender to facts years ago, join me

You would not know a fact if it bit you on your ass.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Bernie Sanders communications director is an illegal immigrant , you said she is not she is daca lol
You are a moron lol

She was brought here when she was 6 years old and is protected by the DACA program until such time as the courts work it all out.

Those are the facts.

Again, you would not know a fact if it bit you on the ass.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

She is illegal! Lol and should be removed.. you said earlier she should be killed you would shoot her lol

She is here now and the courts will have the final say on what happens


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

She should be excuted she is an adult now she knows she should leave.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Its bad when a Greenpeace founder calls AOC a stupid imbecile.

you would think some capitalists would insist on some competition of ideas.

nothing but national socialists on the right wing?

View attachment 248719

Yeah. Put your windmills and solar panels in the big cities that want the energy/power and quit messing up my backyard and skyline.

*****SMILE*****

You don't have to keep proving you're a gullible fool and dimwit. We're already sold on the idea.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And the Repubs wonder why they lose the female vote every election.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

So, here is the problem with both parties.

If there is a petulant and spoiled brat that happens to be female; then to call her a petulant child somehow equates to some kind of misogyny and costs people a gender vote.

Is it any wonder that the woman's movement has destroyed itself?

The problem is that a man would never be labeled as such.

Do you think you can find an example of a male being called such on this forum?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Who cares what they are labeled as. The issue is, when a woman misbehaves, people cannot call them out for fear of losing a vote on false charges.

You okay with that?

That is such bullshit. You are not that mistreated. Women are called out all the time.

Quit whining


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

wow. I have to be mistreated in order to call out mistreatment?

Talk about bullshit.

If you criticize a woman on the substance of her positions or what she says nobody will ever question you.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Cecilie1200]

Wow...would that ever be said about a male congressman...freshman or otherwise?

Ocasio is making people pay attention to issues long neglected.

Deal with it

She is a petulant, annoying child and should be treated as such.

And the Repubs wonder why they lose the female vote every election.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

So, here is the problem with both parties.

If there is a petulant and spoiled brat that happens to be female; then to call her a petulant child somehow equates to some kind of misogyny and costs people a gender vote.

Is it any wonder that the woman's movement has destroyed itself?

The problem is that a man would never be labeled as such.

Do you think you can find an example of a male being called such on this forum?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Who cares what they are labeled as. The issue is, when a woman misbehaves, people cannot call them out for fear of losing a vote on false charges.

You okay with that?

Actually, I've heard men called petulant child and the equivalent thereof many times. Hell, I've heard that accusation leveled at President Trump so many times I've lost count.

Anyone trying to claim that the criticisms leveled at Occasional Cortex are because of her vagina and not because of her stupidity is just saying so because HE is a misogynist who thinks if someone is a woman, that's ALL she is.

 

[Cecilie1200]

So, here is the problem with both parties.

If there is a petulant and spoiled brat that happens to be female; then to call her a petulant child somehow equates to some kind of misogyny and costs people a gender vote.

Is it any wonder that the woman's movement has destroyed itself?

The problem is that a man would never be labeled as such.

Do you think you can find an example of a male being called such on this forum?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Who cares what they are labeled as. The issue is, when a woman misbehaves, people cannot call them out for fear of losing a vote on false charges.

You okay with that?

That is such bullshit. You are not that mistreated. Women are called out all the time.

Quit whining


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

wow. I have to be mistreated in order to call out mistreatment?

Talk about bullshit.

If you criticize a woman on the substance of her positions or what she says nobody will ever question you.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

THAT lie is a whopper.

 

[Darkwind]

So, here is the problem with both parties.

If there is a petulant and spoiled brat that happens to be female; then to call her a petulant child somehow equates to some kind of misogyny and costs people a gender vote.

Is it any wonder that the woman's movement has destroyed itself?

The problem is that a man would never be labeled as such.

Do you think you can find an example of a male being called such on this forum?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Who cares what they are labeled as. The issue is, when a woman misbehaves, people cannot call them out for fear of losing a vote on false charges.

You okay with that?

That is such bullshit. You are not that mistreated. Women are called out all the time.

Quit whining


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

wow. I have to be mistreated in order to call out mistreatment?

Talk about bullshit.

If you criticize a woman on the substance of her positions or what she says nobody will ever question you.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

In fact, they and you, are doing so right now.

She has been called out on the substance of her idiocy. Now, the left are making it out to be nothing more than an attack on her because she is a woman when in truth, she is fucking stupid and happens to be a girl.

Unless you have quotes from her on how she plans on feeding 7 billion mouths without using carbon energy.

Do you have one of those?

 

[Lesh]

You would not know a fact if it bit you on your ass.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Bernie Sanders communications director is an illegal immigrant , you said she is not she is daca lol
You are a moron lol

She was brought here when she was 6 years old and is protected by the DACA program until such time as the courts work it all out.

Those are the facts.

Again, you would not know a fact if it bit you on the ass.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

She is illegal! Lol and should be removed.. you said earlier she should be killed you would shoot her lol

She is here now and the courts will have the final say on what happens


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

She should be excuted she is an adult now she knows she should leave.

If this were your country (Russia) she probably would have an "accident" huh...

 

[Lesh]

She is a petulant, annoying child and should be treated as such.

And the Repubs wonder why they lose the female vote every election.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

So, here is the problem with both parties.

If there is a petulant and spoiled brat that happens to be female; then to call her a petulant child somehow equates to some kind of misogyny and costs people a gender vote.

Is it any wonder that the woman's movement has destroyed itself?

The problem is that a man would never be labeled as such.

Do you think you can find an example of a male being called such on this forum?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Who cares what they are labeled as. The issue is, when a woman misbehaves, people cannot call them out for fear of losing a vote on false charges.

You okay with that?

Actually, I've heard men called petulant child and the equivalent thereof many times. Hell, I've heard that accusation leveled at President Trump so many times I've lost count.

Anyone trying to claim that the criticisms leveled at Occasional Cortex are because of her vagina and not because of her stupidity is just saying so because HE is a misogynist who thinks if someone is a woman, that's ALL she is.

Really? You've "heard that"?

Good for you. Which legislator has been called tht?

Did anyone call the idiot who said "Liar Liar Pants on Fire" that the other day? No?

I wonder why. That certainly was a childish thing for a Congressional Legislator to say...don't you agree (now that you have no other option)?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The problem is that a man would never be labeled as such.

Do you think you can find an example of a male being called such on this forum?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Who cares what they are labeled as. The issue is, when a woman misbehaves, people cannot call them out for fear of losing a vote on false charges.

You okay with that?

That is such bullshit. You are not that mistreated. Women are called out all the time.

Quit whining


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

wow. I have to be mistreated in order to call out mistreatment?

Talk about bullshit.

If you criticize a woman on the substance of her positions or what she says nobody will ever question you.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

In fact, they and you, are doing so right now.

She has been called out on the substance of her idiocy. Now, the left are making it out to be nothing more than an attack on her because she is a woman when in truth, she is fucking stupid and happens to be a girl.

Unless you have quotes from her on how she plans on feeding 7 billion mouths without using carbon energy.

Do you have one of those?

Calling her petulant spoiled twit has nothing to do with her position.

As for that NGD, she is, as I said playing a part and becoming the story. Do you think she came up with that plan all on her own, or was it given to her to push?

With all the focus on her and “her” pipe dream almost any other bill on the topic will seem down right normal and not get any attention.

And that is by design.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Lesh]

She has been called out on the substance of her idiocy.

Actually in two short months, she has been called out for

Being too young

Being a woman

Knowing how to dance

Being too poor

Being too wealthy

Buying clothes

Supposedly being petulant

Supposedly being childish

And having the audacity to challenge conventional thinking

So there's that

 

[Kittymom1026]

Its bad when a Greenpeace founder calls AOC a stupid imbecile.

you would think some capitalists would insist on some competition of ideas.

nothing but national socialists on the right wing?

View attachment 248719

Yeah. Put your windmills and solar panels in the big cities that want the energy/power and quit messing up my backyard and skyline.

*****SMILE*****

You don't have to keep proving you're a gullible fool and dimwit. We're already sold on the idea.

Remind me of that when you have to wear a mask due to the polluted air. China now has to do that and as a result, are trying to take steps to rectify it. OK, and how much bottled water do you now buy weekly?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Who cares what they are labeled as. The issue is, when a woman misbehaves, people cannot call them out for fear of losing a vote on false charges.

You okay with that?

That is such bullshit. You are not that mistreated. Women are called out all the time.

Quit whining


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

wow. I have to be mistreated in order to call out mistreatment?

Talk about bullshit.

If you criticize a woman on the substance of her positions or what she says nobody will ever question you.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

In fact, they and you, are doing so right now.

She has been called out on the substance of her idiocy. Now, the left are making it out to be nothing more than an attack on her because she is a woman when in truth, she is fucking stupid and happens to be a girl.

Unless you have quotes from her on how she plans on feeding 7 billion mouths without using carbon energy.

Do you have one of those?

Calling her petulant spoiled twit has nothing to do with her position.

As for that NGD, she is, as I said playing a part and becoming the story. Do you think she came up with that plan all on her own, or was it given to her to push?

With all the focus on her and “her” pipe dream almost any other bill on the topic will seem down right normal and not get any attention.

And that is by design.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

And there were two shooters on the grassy knoll.

My God, the mental pretzel leftists will twist themselves into to avoid admitting that they've elected morons pushing nonsense.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

She has been called out on the substance of her idiocy.

Actually in two short months, she has been called out for

Being too young

Being a woman

Knowing how to dance

Being too poor

Being too wealthy

Buying clothes

Supposedly being petulant

Supposedly being childish

And having the audacity to challenge conventional thinking

So there's that

Don’t forget her teeth!


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Cecilie1200]

Its bad when a Greenpeace founder calls AOC a stupid imbecile.

you would think some capitalists would insist on some competition of ideas.

nothing but national socialists on the right wing?

View attachment 248719

Yeah. Put your windmills and solar panels in the big cities that want the energy/power and quit messing up my backyard and skyline.

*****SMILE*****

You don't have to keep proving you're a gullible fool and dimwit. We're already sold on the idea.

Remind me of that when you have to wear a mask due to the polluted air. China now has to do that and as a result, are trying to take steps to rectify it. OK, and how much bottled water do you now buy weekly?

Oh, yes, I forgot. Republicans want all the air and water filthy and unusable . . . because we don't breathe oxygen and get dehydrated like all the other organic creatures on the planet.

Like I said, twatforbrains, you don't have to keep proving to us that you're a dimwit. No one's arguing the point.

 

[Kittymom1026]

you would think some capitalists would insist on some competition of ideas.

nothing but national socialists on the right wing?

View attachment 248719

Yeah. Put your windmills and solar panels in the big cities that want the energy/power and quit messing up my backyard and skyline.

*****SMILE*****

You don't have to keep proving you're a gullible fool and dimwit. We're already sold on the idea.

Remind me of that when you have to wear a mask due to the polluted air. China now has to do that and as a result, are trying to take steps to rectify it. OK, and how much bottled water do you now buy weekly?

Oh, yes, I forgot. Republicans want all the air and water filthy and unusable . . . because we don't breathe oxygen and get dehydrated like all the other organic creatures on the planet.

Like I said, twatforbrains, you don't have to keep proving to us that you're a dimwit. No one's arguing the point.

One thing I noticed about many of you, when you can't come up with an actual defense of something, you start name calling. You at least have that in common with tramp as he does the same thing.

 

[Cecilie1200]

View attachment 248719

Yeah. Put your windmills and solar panels in the big cities that want the energy/power and quit messing up my backyard and skyline.

*****SMILE*****

You don't have to keep proving you're a gullible fool and dimwit. We're already sold on the idea.

Remind me of that when you have to wear a mask due to the polluted air. China now has to do that and as a result, are trying to take steps to rectify it. OK, and how much bottled water do you now buy weekly?

Oh, yes, I forgot. Republicans want all the air and water filthy and unusable . . . because we don't breathe oxygen and get dehydrated like all the other organic creatures on the planet.

Like I said, twatforbrains, you don't have to keep proving to us that you're a dimwit. No one's arguing the point.

One thing I noticed about many of you, when you can't come up with an actual defense of something, you start name calling. You at least have that in common with tramp as he does the same thing.

One thing I noticed about you: when someone doesn't conform to your personal kindergarten standard of behavior, you're incapable seeing past the butthurt to the actual point.

In deference to your childish sensibilities, I will spell out the point you couldn't see through the crying:

Republicans are as dependent on air and water for existence as you are, so it's hyperbolic and ridiculous to claim that disagreeing with you on environmental policy means that they want air and water too dirty to use.

Now it's time for you to grow up BOTH on the "you called me a mean name! Waaahhh!!!" front, and on the "You don't agree with me, so you're pure evil!!!" front.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Its bad when a Greenpeace founder calls AOC a stupid imbecile.

you would think some capitalists would insist on some competition of ideas.

nothing but national socialists on the right wing?

View attachment 248719

Yeah. Put your windmills and solar panels in the big cities that want the energy/power and quit messing up my backyard and skyline.

*****SMILE*****

What do you consider renewable?

I'm more than willing to have the government invest a trillion dollars in renewable energy research. Like fusion power, the Casimir Effect, and other energy options that scientists are working on. However I am not willing to invest seven trillion plus dollars on bull shit ineffiecient energy projects and funding, that private businesses (like Solyndra) and brain dead progressives want to institute, all in the name of Al Gore and his global warming scam just so my skyline looks like the above picture.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Kittymom1026]

You don't have to keep proving you're a gullible fool and dimwit. We're already sold on the idea.

Remind me of that when you have to wear a mask due to the polluted air. China now has to do that and as a result, are trying to take steps to rectify it. OK, and how much bottled water do you now buy weekly?

Oh, yes, I forgot. Republicans want all the air and water filthy and unusable . . . because we don't breathe oxygen and get dehydrated like all the other organic creatures on the planet.

Like I said, twatforbrains, you don't have to keep proving to us that you're a dimwit. No one's arguing the point.

One thing I noticed about many of you, when you can't come up with an actual defense of something, you start name calling. You at least have that in common with tramp as he does the same thing.

One thing I noticed about you: when someone doesn't conform to your personal kindergarten standard of behavior, you're incapable seeing past the butthurt to the actual point.

In deference to your childish sensibilities, I will spell out the point you couldn't see through the crying:

Republicans are as dependent on air and water for existence as you are, so it's hyperbolic and ridiculous to claim that disagreeing with you on environmental policy means that they want air and water too dirty to use.

Now it's time for you to grow up BOTH on the "you called me a mean name! Waaahhh!!!" front, and on the "You don't agree with me, so you're pure evil!!!" front.

I never said any of that, so nice try. I grew up 32 miles from Pittsburgh Pa. and can remember the steel mills and the orange smoke that spewed from the pipes almost 24/7. You could smell the sulfur when you were coming into the city and the sky was always a hazy orange. Now the sky is clear and the air is clear too. The people can breathe easier and the rivers are pretty much unpolluted too.
I lived in Latrobe Pa. and we had a steel mill there too, but it wasn't as bad as the ones in Pittsburgh, but it was bad enough. And coal was a big thing back then too. We had a coal furnace for as long as I could remember until my dad had it converted to baseboard water heat. I stayed sick with bronchitis for years but as soon as the furnace was converted, never suffered from it again.

Here's a question for you.......why would you want to subject your country to damaging air and water if it could be prevented? We need to clean both, but it seems that you're perfectly fine with it getting more polluted everyday. Why is that?
Notice I replied to you without calling you any names, but feel free to call me name again since that's what you do.

 

[Cecilie1200]

You don't have to keep proving you're a gullible fool and dimwit. We're already sold on the idea.

Remind me of that when you have to wear a mask due to the polluted air. China now has to do that and as a result, are trying to take steps to rectify it. OK, and how much bottled water do you now buy weekly?

Oh, yes, I forgot. Republicans want all the air and water filthy and unusable . . . because we don't breathe oxygen and get dehydrated like all the other organic creatures on the planet.

Like I said, twatforbrains, you don't have to keep proving to us that you're a dimwit. No one's arguing the point.

One thing I noticed about many of you, when you can't come up with an actual defense of something, you start name calling. You at least have that in common with tramp as he does the same thing.

One thing I noticed about you: when someone doesn't conform to your personal kindergarten standard of behavior, you're incapable seeing past the butthurt to the actual point.

In deference to your childish sensibilities, I will spell out the point you couldn't see through the crying:

Republicans are as dependent on air and water for existence as you are, so it's hyperbolic and ridiculous to claim that disagreeing with you on environmental policy means that they want air and water too dirty to use.

Now it's time for you to grow up BOTH on the "you called me a mean name! Waaahhh!!!" front, and on the "You don't agree with me, so you're pure evil!!!" front.

I never said any of that, so nice try. I grew up 32 miles from Pittsburgh Pa. and can remember the steel mills and the orange smoke that spewed from the pipes almost 24/7. You could smell the sulfur when you were coming into the city and the sky was always a hazy orange. Now the sky is clear and the air is clear too. The people can breathe easier and the rivers are pretty much unpolluted too.
I lived in Latrobe Pa. and we had a steel mill there too, but it wasn't as bad as the ones in Pittsburgh, but it was bad enough. And coal was a big thing back then too. We had a coal furnace for as long as I could remember until my dad had it converted to baseboard water heat. I stayed sick with bronchitis for years but as soon as the furnace was converted, never suffered from it again.

Here's a question for you.......why would you want to subject your country to damaging air and water if it could be prevented? We need to clean both, but it seems that you're perfectly fine with it getting more polluted everyday. Why is that?
Notice I replied to you without calling you any names, but feel free to call me name again since that's what you do.

"I didn't say THOSE EXACT WORDS, so that means I didn't say it at all!" Yeah, you're really making a case for how you're a mature grown-up who deserves to be treated with respect.

Oh, I forgot. You're a leftist. You think you deserve respect just for breathing in and out.

Before we move on to you thinking you're in charge and demanding answers, let's just address your lying assertion that you didn't say people on the right want pollution. This is your quote:

Remind me of that when you have to wear a mask due to the polluted air.

And then you followed up with:

OK, and how much bottled water do you now buy weekly?

Now, I realize that you're not the brightest bulb on the midway, but I have difficulty believing that you spat out those two smug, self-righteous remarks without any idea that you were saying that you think that anyone who doesn't agree with you about environmental policy therefore wanted polluted air and water.

So before we go any further, and DEFINITELY before you get any grand ideas about how you're going to interrogate me and how I'm going to defend myself to the likes of you, you will first need to have the brains and the guts to admit that 1) you were saying exactly what I said you were, and 2) it's childish, irrational, and melodramatic.

 

[Kittymom1026]

Remind me of that when you have to wear a mask due to the polluted air. China now has to do that and as a result, are trying to take steps to rectify it. OK, and how much bottled water do you now buy weekly?

Oh, yes, I forgot. Republicans want all the air and water filthy and unusable . . . because we don't breathe oxygen and get dehydrated like all the other organic creatures on the planet.

Like I said, twatforbrains, you don't have to keep proving to us that you're a dimwit. No one's arguing the point.

One thing I noticed about many of you, when you can't come up with an actual defense of something, you start name calling. You at least have that in common with tramp as he does the same thing.

One thing I noticed about you: when someone doesn't conform to your personal kindergarten standard of behavior, you're incapable seeing past the butthurt to the actual point.

In deference to your childish sensibilities, I will spell out the point you couldn't see through the crying:

Republicans are as dependent on air and water for existence as you are, so it's hyperbolic and ridiculous to claim that disagreeing with you on environmental policy means that they want air and water too dirty to use.

Now it's time for you to grow up BOTH on the "you called me a mean name! Waaahhh!!!" front, and on the "You don't agree with me, so you're pure evil!!!" front.

I never said any of that, so nice try. I grew up 32 miles from Pittsburgh Pa. and can remember the steel mills and the orange smoke that spewed from the pipes almost 24/7. You could smell the sulfur when you were coming into the city and the sky was always a hazy orange. Now the sky is clear and the air is clear too. The people can breathe easier and the rivers are pretty much unpolluted too.
I lived in Latrobe Pa. and we had a steel mill there too, but it wasn't as bad as the ones in Pittsburgh, but it was bad enough. And coal was a big thing back then too. We had a coal furnace for as long as I could remember until my dad had it converted to baseboard water heat. I stayed sick with bronchitis for years but as soon as the furnace was converted, never suffered from it again.

Here's a question for you.......why would you want to subject your country to damaging air and water if it could be prevented? We need to clean both, but it seems that you're perfectly fine with it getting more polluted everyday. Why is that?
Notice I replied to you without calling you any names, but feel free to call me name again since that's what you do.

"I didn't say THOSE EXACT WORDS, so that means I didn't say it at all!" Yeah, you're really making a case for how you're a mature grown-up who deserves to be treated with respect.

Oh, I forgot. You're a leftist. You think you deserve respect just for breathing in and out.

Before we move on to you thinking you're in charge and demanding answers, let's just address your lying assertion that you didn't say people on the right want pollution. This is your quote:

Remind me of that when you have to wear a mask due to the polluted air.

And then you followed up with:

OK, and how much bottled water do you now buy weekly?

Now, I realize that you're not the brightest bulb on the midway, but I have difficulty believing that you spat out those two smug, self-righteous remarks without any idea that you were saying that you think that anyone who doesn't agree with you about environmental policy therefore wanted polluted air and water.

So before we go any further, and DEFINITELY before you get any grand ideas about how you're going to interrogate me and how I'm going to defend myself to the likes of you, you will first need to have the brains and the guts to admit that 1) you were saying exactly what I said you were, and 2) it's childish, irrational, and melodramatic.

Actually, I'm not going to interrogate you because I'm finished with you. I will no longer be replying to you because I have read all I need to know about you and you're simply not worth my time. You once again call me names and try to insult me. So as they say, Bye Felicity.