Yurt
Gold Member
- Jun 15, 2004
- 25,603
- 3,614
No, fuck you.......you're making excuses for the company. You really have no proof that she had done it before, other than the manager's word and we know he's an ass like you.what proof do you have of that?
It's in the article........didn't you even bother to read it?
so was the statement she wasn't fired for that....did you bother to read it?
idiot
Yeah.....heartless like you they decided to wait until she was robbed at gun point to finally decide she wasn't doing her job....you must be another one of those "compassionate conservatives," moron.
fuck you, where did i say they were right for what they did?
it is more logical that she was fired to repeatedly breaking the rules than being fired for not giving the $400 back.
That's what the manager is claiming, but the teen said they told her she either paid the $400 or be fired. And what an opportune time for the manager to fire her.....after she was robbed at gun point. Anyone with a brain and some semblance of a heart would find that offensive. Thank you for showing your ass.
i've already said they messed up you little liar. i was asking for proof that she was fired for not giving back the money, you quoted the article in a snide manner, while IGNORING the part of the article that said she wasn't fired for that.
all you've done is prove you're an idiot.
It was both.......idiot. Not all reports mentioned all of the facts. Most people with a brain would have researched it before assuming anything from just one article. But, alas, you don't have a brain, so that explains why you're an idiot.
and your proof is........................................................................................................
yeah....that is what i thought
you IGNORE what the management says and basically call them liars, but of course her side is 100% truth
fool