Ravi
Diamond Member
Nope, he's in his mom's basement. But he still might get arrested any minute if they pick up the heat signature from his grow lamp.
He's hopeless, isn't he?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope, he's in his mom's basement. But he still might get arrested any minute if they pick up the heat signature from his grow lamp.
Nope, he's in his mom's basement. But he still might get arrested any minute if they pick up the heat signature from his grow lamp.
No, im in YOUR mom's basement, dude.. that that heat signature isn't being caused by a lamp so much as it is being caused by the friction created while she is working for this months rent money. I'll spare you the details because I don't want you calling me Daddy.
What if the patron that requested the filter be turned off was a sixteen year old? Would the library have to comply?
Are you suggesting that their decision is not relevant? 5-4 decisions happen and are still relevant.
indeed, hows the 07 partial birth abortion ruling holding up?
Not in my book.
In my best Shogunesque condescending tone...
Thankfully, your book is not the standard by which we all must live.
yea.. I kinda thought thats what you were trying to achieve.
it's cool, dude. Your opinion of it's relevance is probably about as significant as those who work at planned parenthood this side of a particular 07 scotus 5-4 decision.
How about with a waiver from the parent?
or, rather, the FACT of it's ruling. Say, Reilly, what was the ruling breakdown of Pico since, apparently, THAT seems to meet your precedent criteria?
Okay, and then lets turn this argument around. Dont you think that a line should be drawn somewhere? Ill try my best to explain through questions. If the public (read public library) is not responsible for providing you with porn (whatever porn is), then what is the public library responsible for? What if I think that pro-Republican books are just as dangerous and despicable and offensive as porn? The library is not supposed to provide us with said books then. What if other people are offended by other stuff or other things? Then the public library will be reduced to nothing but an empty building.
Why, do you think the library would be obligated to comply?
Hmmm. Tough call. Is it legal for a parent to buy porn for an under age son? If so then I think that such should be permitted in this case.
Why, do you think the library would be obligated to comply?
Personal attacks. Shame on you. Show some class.
Your decisions would be made due to POLITICAL motivations. Ask Reilly about how scotus specifically separated POLITICIAL motivation from removing PORN.
The library is not your RIGHT. It's a benefit. We could close down every library in America and the nation would still move along. The Constitution says nothing about preserving your public access to information. Hell, Ben Franklin's Junta was the source of public librarys but even THESE were taken from PERSONAL COLLECTIONS of books. And, the general public did NOT have access. Joe the bum didn't get to tell Ben what book to stock.
An empty building? gimme a fucking break. Net labs make up what, 5-10% of any given library floor space? The Written word going to become instinct just because you cant get it via the net?
And very little consideration has been given by anyone to points that aren't their own.
I don't know if that's legal or not. And I wasn't thinking about porn, just the ability to get the filter turned off. What if the kid was doing a research project for biology class, for example?