Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So that's the precedent you want to set? Every time a president doesn't get what they want they can just shut down the government until they do like a toddler with a cookie?
Or is this only okay with you when a Republican is in the Oval?
A. it's peanuts, give it to him.
B. there is no good reason to be strongly opposed to the Wall.
That wasn't the question I asked. I asked if that is really a precedent you're comfortable setting. Every time a president doesn't get what they want, it's okay with you for them to hold fed workers hostage and shut down the government?
Or is it only okay when a Republican is president?
There's plenty of reasons to oppose "the wall". hat it is ineffectual would be the primary reason. Money needs to be spent on border security, but a wall is not the best way to secure our borders.
Considering the stakes, yes it is.
What stakes? And again, no it isn't. A "wall" is not the best way to secure our borders.
Oh, just the interests of our citizens, from their wages to their very lives, not to mention the damage to the nation as a whole.
And a "Wall" is a fine addition to securing our borders, which is why you libs are so against it.
So that's the precedent you want to set? Every time a president doesn't get what they want they can just shut down the government until they do like a toddler with a cookie?
Or is this only okay with you when a Republican is in the Oval?
A. it's peanuts, give it to him.
B. there is no good reason to be strongly opposed to the Wall.
That wasn't the question I asked. I asked if that is really a precedent you're comfortable setting. Every time a president doesn't get what they want, it's okay with you for them to hold fed workers hostage and shut down the government?
Or is it only okay when a Republican is president?
There's plenty of reasons to oppose "the wall". hat it is ineffectual would be the primary reason. Money needs to be spent on border security, but a wall is not the best way to secure our borders.
Considering the stakes, yes it is.
What stakes? And again, no it isn't. A "wall" is not the best way to secure our borders.
Oh, just the interests of our citizens, from their wages to their very lives, not to mention the damage to the nation as a whole.
And a "Wall" is a fine addition to securing our borders, which is why you libs are so against it.
I guess you never was CNN's Jim Acosta standing in front of a portion of the wall and declaring how there were not any illegals trying to climb over it........ASSHOLE!So that's the precedent you want to set? Every time a president doesn't get what they want they can just shut down the government until they do like a toddler with a cookie?
Or is this only okay with you when a Republican is in the Oval?
A. it's peanuts, give it to him.
B. there is no good reason to be strongly opposed to the Wall.
That wasn't the question I asked. I asked if that is really a precedent you're comfortable setting. Every time a president doesn't get what they want, it's okay with you for them to hold fed workers hostage and shut down the government?
Or is it only okay when a Republican is president?
There's plenty of reasons to oppose "the wall". hat it is ineffectual would be the primary reason. Money needs to be spent on border security, but a wall is not the best way to secure our borders.
Considering the stakes, yes it is.
What stakes? And again, no it isn't. A "wall" is not the best way to secure our borders.
A 'WALL' keeps out everyone Nancy and Hillary don't want living moving into their mansions and stealing their garbage cans.
So that's the precedent you want to set? Every time a president doesn't get what they want they can just shut down the government until they do like a toddler with a cookie?
Or is this only okay with you when a Republican is in the Oval?
A. it's peanuts, give it to him.
B. there is no good reason to be strongly opposed to the Wall.
That wasn't the question I asked. I asked if that is really a precedent you're comfortable setting. Every time a president doesn't get what they want, it's okay with you for them to hold fed workers hostage and shut down the government?
Or is it only okay when a Republican is president?
There's plenty of reasons to oppose "the wall". hat it is ineffectual would be the primary reason. Money needs to be spent on border security, but a wall is not the best way to secure our borders.
Considering the stakes, yes it is.
What stakes? And again, no it isn't. A "wall" is not the best way to secure our borders.
Oh, just the interests of our citizens, from their wages to their very lives, not to mention the damage to the nation as a whole.
And a "Wall" is a fine addition to securing our borders, which is why you libs are so against it.
He shut down the government, at an estimate cost of over 6 billion dollars. Is that the art of the deal?
Yes.
Give him the token he wants, and everything goes back to normal.
So that's the precedent you want to set? Every time a president doesn't get what they want they can just shut down the government until they do like a toddler with a cookie?
Or is this only okay with you when a Republican is in the Oval?
A. it's peanuts, give it to him.
B. there is no good reason to be strongly opposed to the Wall.
That wasn't the question I asked. I asked if that is really a precedent you're comfortable setting. Every time a president doesn't get what they want, it's okay with you for them to hold fed workers hostage and shut down the government?
Or is it only okay when a Republican is president?
There's plenty of reasons to oppose "the wall". hat it is ineffectual would be the primary reason. Money needs to be spent on border security, but a wall is not the best way to secure our borders.
/——/ The Gubmint has been shut down many times because one side didn’t get what they wanted. You seem to think this was the first time.
Yes.
Give him the token he wants, and everything goes back to normal.
So that's the precedent you want to set? Every time a president doesn't get what they want they can just shut down the government until they do like a toddler with a cookie?
Or is this only okay with you when a Republican is in the Oval?
A. it's peanuts, give it to him.
B. there is no good reason to be strongly opposed to the Wall.
That wasn't the question I asked. I asked if that is really a precedent you're comfortable setting. Every time a president doesn't get what they want, it's okay with you for them to hold fed workers hostage and shut down the government?
Or is it only okay when a Republican is president?
There's plenty of reasons to oppose "the wall". hat it is ineffectual would be the primary reason. Money needs to be spent on border security, but a wall is not the best way to secure our borders.
Considering the stakes, yes it is.
What stakes? And again, no it isn't. A "wall" is not the best way to secure our borders.
A. it's peanuts, give it to him.
B. there is no good reason to be strongly opposed to the Wall.
That wasn't the question I asked. I asked if that is really a precedent you're comfortable setting. Every time a president doesn't get what they want, it's okay with you for them to hold fed workers hostage and shut down the government?
Or is it only okay when a Republican is president?
There's plenty of reasons to oppose "the wall". hat it is ineffectual would be the primary reason. Money needs to be spent on border security, but a wall is not the best way to secure our borders.
Considering the stakes, yes it is.
What stakes? And again, no it isn't. A "wall" is not the best way to secure our borders.
Oh, just the interests of our citizens, from their wages to their very lives, not to mention the damage to the nation as a whole.
And a "Wall" is a fine addition to securing our borders, which is why you libs are so against it.
It's the businesses and home owners who hire most of those undocumented workers, below is an example:
Write it down. A National Emergency declaration is coming.
Guaranteed.
Write it down. A National Emergency declaration is coming.
Guaranteed.
More likey, another epic letdown.
really?Write it down. A National Emergency declaration is coming.
Guaranteed.
really?Write it down. A National Emergency declaration is coming.
Guaranteed.
A. it's peanuts, give it to him.
B. there is no good reason to be strongly opposed to the Wall.
That wasn't the question I asked. I asked if that is really a precedent you're comfortable setting. Every time a president doesn't get what they want, it's okay with you for them to hold fed workers hostage and shut down the government?
Or is it only okay when a Republican is president?
There's plenty of reasons to oppose "the wall". hat it is ineffectual would be the primary reason. Money needs to be spent on border security, but a wall is not the best way to secure our borders.
Considering the stakes, yes it is.
What stakes? And again, no it isn't. A "wall" is not the best way to secure our borders.
Oh, just the interests of our citizens, from their wages to their very lives, not to mention the damage to the nation as a whole.
And a "Wall" is a fine addition to securing our borders, which is why you libs are so against it.
A wall is nothing but a bumper sticker slogan kept simple and dumbed down enough for Trump and his boot lickers. A wall will not stop the overstaying of Visas
Where Does Illegal Immigration Mostly Occur? Here's What The Data Tell Us
A wall is not going to stop drugs from entering the U.S.
Will Trump's Wall Stop Drug Smuggling? - FactCheck.org
The wall is nothing but a vanity project being sold to you by a hucksters con man.
The fact that it isnt an emergency for starters.Vegas has it as 100-1 that Trump uses the National Emergency option and since it takes a Joint Resolution of Congress to end the emergency, it looks good that the Senate would support the wall and the courts would let it go since it is totally Constitutional.
Otherwise what basis would the courts have for stopping it?
The fact that it isnt an emergency for starters.Vegas has it as 100-1 that Trump uses the National Emergency option and since it takes a Joint Resolution of Congress to end the emergency, it looks good that the Senate would support the wall and the courts would let it go since it is totally Constitutional.
Otherwise what basis would the courts have for stopping it?
Boom"I met with the brave workers and former employees of Trump’s golf clubs in NY and NJ who told me of the abuse, coercion, and hypocritical hiring practices of a man who demonizes undocumented immigrants on the one hand, but had no problem bending the law to employ them.
The hypocrisy of this president is astounding. Trump shut down the government for a border wall that would supposedly stop people from coming, yet had no problem hiring undocumented immigrants and exploiting their labor for his own personal gain."
